Literature DB >> 27327780

Paving the way to a more effective informed consent process: Recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.

Jennifer Lentz1, Michele Kennett2, Jane Perlmutter3, Annemarie Forrest4.   

Abstract

Ethically sound clinical research requires that prospective study participants provide voluntary informed consent before any study procedures begin. The original intent was to provide the participant with clear, accurate information about study specifics (e.g., risks/benefits) to aid in the decision to participate. Broad consensus among sponsors, research staff, study participants, and advocates indicate that the current process could be improved to enhance participants' understanding of study-related information and meet the needs of individuals. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) convened a project to identify problems in the current process and to formulate recommendations for improvement. A literature review, expert interviews, and multi-stakeholder meeting were conducted to identify barriers and develop solutions for a more effective informed consent process. Four key topics were the foundation of the recommendations: 1) defining an effective informed consent process, 2) training research staff, 3) improving the informed consent document, and 4) exploring the use of electronic consent. The ideal informed consent process involves an ongoing, interactive conversation between the participant and knowledgeable, responsive research staff who were trained in best practices. The informed consent process should be supported by a tiered informed consent document that provides critically relevant information to aid in the decision to participate in a study. Adoption of the CTTI informed consent recommendations should lead to a more participant-centric informed consent process. Participant involvement better meets the needs of participants and benefits the clinical trial enterprise by promoting a research culture that encourages informed participation in clinical studies.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research; Decision-making; Health policy; Informed consent; Institutional review board; Research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27327780     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  23 in total

1.  Strategies nurses use when caring for patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury who have cognitive impairments.

Authors:  Tolu O Oyesanya; Mitchell A Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.036

2.  Supporting informed clinical trial decisions: Results from a randomized controlled trial evaluating a digital decision support tool for those with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Lauren A McCormack; Amanda Wylie; Rebecca Moultrie; Robert D Furberg; Anne C Wheeler; Katherine Treiman; Donald B Bailey; Melissa Raspa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Communicating With Diverse Patients About Participating in a Biobank: A Randomized Multisite Study Comparing Electronic and Face-to-Face Informed Consent Processes.

Authors:  Christian M Simon; Kai Wang; Laura A Shinkunas; Daniel T Stein; Paul Meissner; Maureen Smith; Rebecca Pentz; David W Klein
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Evaluating the Perceptions of Teleconsent in Urban and Rural Communities.

Authors:  Saif Khairat; Katie Tirtanadi; Paige Ottmar; Betsy Sleath; Jihad Obeid
Journal:  Eur J Biomed Inform (Praha)       Date:  2019-07-05

5.  Knowledge and Attitudes of Research Participants in China Toward Electronic Informed Consent in Clinical Trials: A Cross Sectional Study.

Authors:  Zhanqing Hu; Chenxi Ouyang; Jessica Hahne; Kaveh Khoshnood; Jinqiang Zhang; Xiyu Liu; Ying Wu; Xiaomin Wang
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.978

6.  Nurses' concerns about caring for patients with acute and chronic traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Tolu O Oyesanya; Barbara J Bowers; Heather R Royer; Lyn S Turkstra
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.036

7.  Evaluating models of consent in changing health research environments.

Authors:  Svenja Wiertz; Joachim Boldt
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2022-03-14

8.  Shortened consent forms for genome-wide sequencing: Parent and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Emma C Hitchcock; Causes Study; Alison M Elliott
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lika Nusbaum; Brenda Douglas; Karla Damus; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Neenah Estrella-Luna
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2017-09-20

10.  Impact of informed consent content and length on recruitment of older adults into a community based primary prevention trial.

Authors:  Fleur O'Hare; Simone Spark; Zachary Flanagan; Stephane Heritier; Andrea Curtis; Sophia Zoungas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.