Literature DB >> 35088177

Effectiveness of a patient-specific guide for femoral stem implantation in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized control trial.

Xin Jin1, Mengcun Chen1, Adnan N Cheema2, Xianzhe Liu1, Shuhua Yang1, Weihua Xu3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a novel CT-based patient-specific femoral alignment guide (PSG) as compared with conventional pre-operative planning during THA.
METHODS: From March 2020 to September 2020, patients receiving unilateral primary THA were enrolled and randomly allocated to the conventional pre-operative planning group and the PSG group. Primary outcomes were radiographic measurements including lower limb length, femoral offset, femoral anteversion and stem varus/valgus angle, and post-operative perception of leg length discrepancy (LLD). Secondary outcomes were surgical time, intra-operative blood loss, total blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Harris Hip Score (HHS). The occurrence of post-operative complications was also recorded.
RESULTS: Of the 104 patients screened, 80 cases were enrolled for analysis. The demographics of the two groups were similar. The PSG group illustrated significant improvements (p < 0.001) in lower limb length, femoral offset, femoral anteversion, and stem varus/valgus angle. Patients in the PSG group showed more favourable HHS (p < 0.001) at seven day, four week, andthree month (p = 0.003) follow-up. Perception of LLD was found significantly lower in the PSG group at three tmonth (p = 0.043), six month (p = 0.025), and 12-month (p = 0.048) follow-up. Utilization of the PSG had no significant increase in operative time, intra-operative blood loss, total blood loss, or VAS. No complication was noted in either group.
CONCLUSION: Relative to conventional pre-operative planning, the application with the PSG could potentially provide a simple and reliable solution for improving femoral prosthesis orientation in THA with high accessibility and low healthcare costs. TRN: ChiCTR2000031043 Date of registration: 2020/3/21.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leg length discrepancy; Patient-specific guide; Post-operative complications; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35088177     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05287-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  20 in total

1.  Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign.

Authors:  Isao Asayama; Masatoshi Naito; Motoyuki Fujisawa; Taichi Kambe
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  A fluoroscopic grid in supine total hip arthroplasty: improving cup position, limb length, and hip offset.

Authors:  Jeremy M Gililland; Lucas A Anderson; Shannon L Boffeli; Christopher E Pelt; Christopher L Peters; Erik N Kubiak
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Richard Lass; Bernd Kubista; Boris Olischar; Sophie Frantal; Reinhard Windhager; Alexander Giurea
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  A comparison between imageless navigated and manual freehand technique acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Erik Hohmann; Adam Bryant; Kevin Tetsworth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The effect of femoral neck osteotomy on femoral component position of a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dimitris Dimitriou; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Konyves; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

7.  Patient-specific instrumentation improves the accuracy of acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  L Spencer-Gardner; J Pierrepont; M Topham; J Baré; S McMahon; A J Shimmin
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement.

Authors:  V Wylde; S L Whitehouse; A H Taylor; G T Pattison; G C Bannister; A W Blom
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  X Flecher; M Ollivier; J N Argenson
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery.

Authors:  A Judge; N K Arden; A Kiran; A Price; M K Javaid; D Beard; D Murray; R E Field
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.