Literature DB >> 35087897

Electronic Medical Records for (Visceral) Medicine: An Overview of the Current Status and Prospects.

Sven Kernebeck1, Theresa Sophie Busse1, Chantal Jux1, Ulrich Bork2, Jan P Ehlers1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) offer key advantages over analog documentation in healthcare. In addition to providing details about current and past treatments, EMRs enable clear and traceable documentation regardless of the location. This supports evidence-based, multi-professional treatment and leads to more efficient healthcare. However, there are still several challenges regarding the use of EMRs. Understanding these challenges is essential to improve healthcare. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current state of EMRs in the field of visceral medicine, to describe the future prospects in this field, and to highlight some of the challenges that need to be faced.
SUMMARY: The benefits of EMRs are manifold and particularly pronounced in the area of quality assurance and improvement of communication not only between different healthcare professionals but also between physicians and patients. Besides the danger of medical errors, the health consequences for the users (cognitive load) arise from poor usability or a system that does not fit into the real world. Involving users in the development of EMRs in the sense of participatory design can be helpful here. The use of EMRs in practice together with patients should be accompanied by training to ensure optimal outcomes in terms of shared decision-making. KEY MESSAGE: EMRs offer a variety of benefits. However, it is critical to consider user involvement, setting specificity, and user training during development, implementation, and use in order to minimize unintended consequences.
Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records; Implementation science; Information technology; Medical records; User-centered design

Year:  2021        PMID: 35087897      PMCID: PMC8739853          DOI: 10.1159/000519254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Visc Med        ISSN: 2297-4725


  40 in total

Review 1.  Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature.

Authors:  Lisette C Roman; Jessica S Ancker; Stephen B Johnson; Yalini Senathirajah
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 2.  Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.

Authors:  Raj Ratwani; Terry Fairbanks; Erica Savage; Katie Adams; Michael Wittie; Edna Boone; Andrew Hayden; Janey Barnes; Zach Hettinger; Andrew Gettinger
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  The Digitization of Patient Care: A Review of the Effects of Electronic Health Records on Health Care Quality and Utilization.

Authors:  Hilal Atasoy; Brad N Greenwood; Jeffrey Scott McCullough
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption.

Authors:  Paul C Tang; Joan S Ash; David W Bates; J Marc Overhage; Daniel Z Sands
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  The electronic elephant in the room: Physicians and the electronic health record.

Authors:  Philip J Kroth; Nancy Morioka-Douglas; Sharry Veres; Katherine Pollock; Stewart Babbott; Sara Poplau; Katherine Corrigan; Mark Linzer
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2018-06-11

6.  Association of Electronic Health Record Design and Use Factors With Clinician Stress and Burnout.

Authors:  Philip J Kroth; Nancy Morioka-Douglas; Sharry Veres; Stewart Babbott; Sara Poplau; Fares Qeadan; Carolyn Parshall; Kathryne Corrigan; Mark Linzer
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-08-02

7.  Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content.

Authors:  Chen Hsi Tsai; Aboozar Eghdam; Nadia Davoody; Graham Wright; Stephen Flowerday; Sabine Koch
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04

8.  Utilizing a Prototype Patient-Controlled Electronic Health Record in Germany: Qualitative Analysis of User-Reported Perceptions and Perspectives.

Authors:  Regina Poss-Doering; Aline Kunz; Sabrina Pohlmann; Helene Hofmann; Marion Kiel; Eva C Winkler; Dominik Ose; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2018-08-03

9.  Cybersecurity Risks in a Pandemic.

Authors:  Christina Meilee Williams; Rahul Chaturvedi; Krishnan Chakravarthy
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.