Martijn van Galen1, Jeya Prathap Kaniraj1,2, Bauke Albada2, Joris Sprakel1. 1. Physical Chemistry and Soft Matter, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708WE Wageningen, The Netherlands. 2. Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Fluorescent damage reporters that use mechanochemical activation of a covalent bond to elicit an optical signal are emerging tools in material mechanics as a means to access the nanoscale distribution of forces inside materials under stress. A promising class of damage reporters are tetraaryl succinonitriles (TASN), whose mechanical activation results in stable fluorescent radical species. However, in-depth insights into the molecular mechanics of TASN activation are absent, precluding their use as quantitative mechanoprobes. Here we perform single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments to provide these insights. We use a bridged version of the TASN unit, embedded in multi-mechanophore polymer, to enable multiplexed mechanochemical measurements at the single-molecule level. Our experiments reveal that TASN activates at surprisingly low forces and short time scales compared to other covalent mechanophores. These results establish TASN as a promising candidate for reporting the lower end of relevant forces in material mechanics.
Fluorescent damage reporters that use mechanochemical activation of a covalent bond to elicit an optical signal are emerging tools in material mechanics as a means to access the nanoscale distribution of forces inside materials under stress. A promising class of damage reporters are tetraaryl succinonitriles (TASN), whose mechanical activation results in stable fluorescent radical species. However, in-depth insights into the molecular mechanics of TASN activation are absent, precluding their use as quantitative mechanoprobes. Here we perform single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments to provide these insights. We use a bridged version of the TASN unit, embedded in multi-mechanophore polymer, to enable multiplexed mechanochemical measurements at the single-molecule level. Our experiments reveal that TASN activates at surprisingly low forces and short time scales compared to other covalent mechanophores. These results establish TASN as a promising candidate for reporting the lower end of relevant forces in material mechanics.
The mechanical
failure of materials, manifested macroscopically
as catastropic fracture or yielding, invariably commences by the rupture
of cohesive bonds at the nanoscale. Direct measurement and visualization
of nanoscale bond scission phenomena have recently become possible
through the development and use of optically responsive mechanophores:
small molecules that undergo a force-induced mechanochemical transition,
for example, the scission of a labile bond, to an optically active
state. When anchored into a polymeric material of interest, stresses
applied to the polymers transfer to the mechanophores. Once a threshold
force on a single mechanophore is exceeded, activation of the reporter
can be detected optically by either absorption,[1−4] mechanoluminescence,[5,6] or fluorescence.[1,7,8] This
can provide a qualitative picture of where damage processes occur
and to what extent. Making these results quantitative requires careful
calibration, as was recently reported for spiropyran mechanophores[9] and, ideally, detailed insights into the molecular
kinetics of mechanochemical activation for the mechanophore of interest.
To date, only very few optical mechanophores have been quantitatively
scrutinized at the molecular level, spiropyran being the notable exception.[10]Tetraaryl succinonitriles (TASN) have
emerged as promising candidates
for damage reporting.[11−14] Mechanophores of this class consist of a central labile succinonitrile
bond flanked by a total of four aromatic moieties (Figure a). When TASN molecules are
placed under tension, the labile succinonitrile bond cleaves homolytically,
resulting in two molecules that feature a strongly fluorescent and
stable radical.[11] While mechanophore activation
is often irreversible, e.g., for dioxetanes[6,15,16] and Diels–Alder adducts of anthracenes,[17,18] TASN dissociation, like for spiropyran, is reversible.[13] Radical recombination can lead to reformation
of the original molecule. This reversibility is advantageous for its
use as a damage reporter, as it allows for the repeated observation
of many damage events over extended periods of time.
Figure 1
(a) Structure of tetraphenyl
succinonitrile (TPSN) which can open
and close reversibly under mechanical triggers, yielding two fluorescent
radical species. The mechanically active bond is shown in blue. (b)
Bridged tetraaryl succinonitrile (TASN) mechanophore 1, with the triethylene glycol bridge shown in red. (c) Chemical structure
of the bridged mechanophore incorporated in an ethylene glycol polymer 2, capped on either end by lipoic acid groups for anchoring
on gold-coated surfaces.
(a) Structure of tetraphenyl
succinonitrile (TPSN) which can open
and close reversibly under mechanical triggers, yielding two fluorescent
radical species. The mechanically active bond is shown in blue. (b)
Bridged tetraaryl succinonitrile (TASN) mechanophore 1, with the triethylene glycol bridge shown in red. (c) Chemical structure
of the bridged mechanophore incorporated in an ethylene glycol polymer 2, capped on either end by lipoic acid groups for anchoring
on gold-coated surfaces.Because these binary
optical damage reporters only activate when
the local force exceeds a threshold value, interpreting optical damage
assays in materials requires knowledge of the rupture force and underlying
mechanochemical reaction kinetics and ideally access to reporters
that span a range of threshold forces. These insights are absent for
TASN as reports have so far relied on qualitative means to activate
the central labile bond, such as grinding.[11]In this paper we use single-molecule force spectroscopy to
perform
a mechanical characterization of TASN mechanophores to investigate
its potential as a fluorescent damage reporter. To ensure ample statistics
during these measurements, we first synthesize a bridged version of
the TASN molecule, which is incorporated into a multi-mechanophore
polymer. We find that TASN activation occurs at lower forces and on
shorter time scales as compared to other commonly used covalent mechanophores
such as spiropyran.[10] Moreover, TASN shows
a high sensitivity to mechanical bond scission, expressed by a substantial
activation length. These properties make the bridged TASN mechanophore
a good candidate for the quantitative reporting of damage processes,
at the lower end of relevant forces, in polymer materials.We
synthesized a bridged version of a TASN mechanophore, adapting
literature procedures,[19−21] in which a triethylene glycol (TEG) bridge connects
the two halves of the molecule (Figure b). Next, we incorporate this molecule 1 into a multi-mechanophore polymer 2 by means of an
azide–alkyne click polymerization (Figure c). The resulting polymer 2 is
end-capped by using lipoic acid groups, at both ends, to ensure strong
anchoring onto gold-coated surfaces. For a detailed overview of synthetic
procedures and analysis, we refer to the Supporting Information.We first tested if the bridged TASN mechanophore 1 displays similar optical properties as the unbridged variants
reported
previously.[11] In previous studies, the
reaction equilibrium between the closed and open state of TASN was
found to be sensitive to temperature, shifting more toward the fluorescent
open state as the temperature was increased between 20 and 100 °C
(Figure a).[11]
Figure 2
(a) Bridged TASN can open reversibly under thermal and
mechanical
triggers, yielding a yellow fluorescent radical. (b) Solutions of
the bridged TASN are colorless at room temperature and appear brightly
yellow fluorescent upon irradiation at 350 nm. (c) Fluorescence emission
spectra with 360 nm excitation reveal an emission peak at 560 nm that
increases with temperature. (d) Decay of the 560 nm fluorescence intensity
over time under 360 nm excitation at 80 °C. (e) Absorbance spectra
at increasing temperatures. The inset shows the enlarged region between
525 and 560 nm. (f) Van ’t Hoff plot of the ring-opening equilibrium
constant ln Keq versus the inverse temperature.
All data in this figure were collected with a 1 mg/mL bridged TASN
concentration in dimethylacetamide.
(a) Bridged TASN can open reversibly under thermal and
mechanical
triggers, yielding a yellow fluorescent radical. (b) Solutions of
the bridged TASN are colorless at room temperature and appear brightly
yellow fluorescent upon irradiation at 350 nm. (c) Fluorescence emission
spectra with 360 nm excitation reveal an emission peak at 560 nm that
increases with temperature. (d) Decay of the 560 nm fluorescence intensity
over time under 360 nm excitation at 80 °C. (e) Absorbance spectra
at increasing temperatures. The inset shows the enlarged region between
525 and 560 nm. (f) Van ’t Hoff plot of the ring-opening equilibrium
constant ln Keq versus the inverse temperature.
All data in this figure were collected with a 1 mg/mL bridged TASN
concentration in dimethylacetamide.Solutions of our bridged mechanophore 1 were colorless
when exposed to ambient light at room temperature, but yellow fluorescent
when irradiated with a 350 nm UV lamp, indicating the presence of
the activated, radical-bearing mechanophore (Figure b). Fluorescence spectroscopy reveals an
emission peak at 560 nm (Figure c), also found previously for the unbridged version,[11] whose intensity increases upon increasing the
temperature. This is in agreement with a shifting equilibrium from
the closed to the open state. We note that these radical species are
remarkably stable, with a half-life of 40 min at 80 °C (Figure d). Absorbance spectra
reveal characteristic peaks at 360 and 548 nm, which also increase
with increasing temperature (Figure e). These peaks were previously attributed to the open
state of the mechanophore.[11] We note that
at 100 °C the absorbance decreases as the result of accelerated
radical quenching at high temperatures. From these data, using the
extinction coefficient for TASN reported previously,[11] we calculate the concentration of activated mechanophore
and the corresponding equilibrium constant ln Keq for the equilibrium between open and closed states, which
we plot as a function of the inverse temperature (Figure f). From a fit of these results
to the van’t Hoff equationwe
can determine the reaction enthalpy ΔH and
entropy ΔS, with R being the
gas constant and T the absolute temperature.
The first and last data points in Figure f strongly deviate from the trend predicted
by eq ; we excluded
these two data points from the fit, as the absorbance was close to
the noise level at 20 °C and notably affected by thermal degradation
of the mechanophore at 100 °C. We determine that ΔH = 91 kJ/mol and ΔS = 80 J/(K mol),
resulting in reaction free energy at 25 °C of ΔG = 67 kJ/mol. Interestingly, ΔH is
very close to the value of 93 kJ/mol previously reported for unbridged
TASN mechanophore, whereas the entropy change ΔS is much lower compared to the 100 J/(K mol) previously reported.
The lowering of the reaction entropy is attributed to the reduction
in translational entropy in our bridged mechanophore upon labile bond
scission. These results indicate how our bridged TASN mechanophore
shows properties and reaction equilibria in full agreement with the
unbridged version reported previously.[11]We now use single-molecule force spectroscopy, on an atomic
force
microscope, to evaluate the molecular mechanics of TASN activation
under mechanical tension. To maximize the statistics in these single-molecule
experiments, we use multi-mechanophore polymers consisting of our
bridged TASN mechanophore 1 linked by ethylene glycol
spacers. This approach of attaching multiple motifs in series has
been used previously in single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments
on supramolecular bonding motifs[22−25] and covalent mechanophores.[26,27]We anchor these polymers, using their terminal lipoic acid
moieties,
to gold-coated surfaces and the gold-coated AFM tip. Because polymer 2 contains multiple bridged TASN mechanophores along its backbone,
each force–extension curve exhibits multiple TASN activation
events (Figure a).
A typical example of a force–extension curve exhibiting multiple
ruptures can be seen in Figure b; a large ensemble of other examples is provided in the Supporting Information.
Figure 3
(a) Retracting the AFM
tip stretches the mechanophore-bearing polymer,
resulting in a series of sequential TASN mechanophore opening events.
This continues until the lipoic acid group detaches from the gold-coated
surface. (b) Typical force–extension curve showing multiple
dissociation events. Extensible wormlike chain fits (eq ) are shown in black. (c) Probability
histogram of the contour length L found by the wormlike
chain fits of all rupture events included in the analysis. (d) Probability
histograms of the rupture forces F recorded at three
tip retraction velocities (0.35, 0.71, and 1.44 μm s–1). As the retraction velocity increases, the mean rupture force moves
to higher forces, as indicated by Gaussian fits shown in black. The
total number of peaks included in each histogram is shown in the upper
right.
(a) Retracting the AFM
tip stretches the mechanophore-bearing polymer,
resulting in a series of sequential TASN mechanophore opening events.
This continues until the lipoic acid group detaches from the gold-coated
surface. (b) Typical force–extension curve showing multiple
dissociation events. Extensible wormlike chain fits (eq ) are shown in black. (c) Probability
histogram of the contour length L found by the wormlike
chain fits of all rupture events included in the analysis. (d) Probability
histograms of the rupture forces F recorded at three
tip retraction velocities (0.35, 0.71, and 1.44 μm s–1). As the retraction velocity increases, the mean rupture force moves
to higher forces, as indicated by Gaussian fits shown in black. The
total number of peaks included in each histogram is shown in the upper
right.Typically, we observe a series
of nonlinear polymer stretching
events, followed by a sudden drop in the force, which signals mechanophore
activation. Because our measurement enforces full separation of tip
from surface at the end of each approach–retract cycle, we
expect that the final peak in each force–extension curve corresponds
to dissociation of the lipoic acid from the gold surface rather than
a mechanophore activation event. For this reason, the final peak was
systematically excluded from all subsequent analysis. Further discussion
on this is provided in the Supporting Information, section 4.5. We first determine characteristics of the polymer
by fitting the force–extension curves prior to the rupture
events with an approximation of the extensible wormlike chain model
(eq )[28]in which L is the polymer
contour length, P its persistence length, and K is the enthalpic compliance of the polymer. We extract
these properties by fitting eq to individual stretching events in our data; two examples
are shown as black solid lines in Figure b. During the fits, we fix P at the value previously observed for poly(ethylene glycol) of 3.8
Å.[29,30]We performed these measurements at
three tip retraction velocities:
0.35, 0.71, and 1.44 μm s–1. For each velocity,
we fitted at least 491 mechanophore activation events with eq . We find a typical contour
length with an optimum in the range of 20–30 nm, as shown from L distributions shown Figure c.We also determined the polymer molecular weight
using gel permeation
chromatography (GPC), resulting in Mn =
4.5 kg/mol and a polydispersity of Mw/Mn = 2.0 (Figure S32). On the basis of the molecular mass of the polymer, we calculated
an average number of TASN mechanophore units per polymer ⟨N⟩ of between 4.5 and 5.9 (Supporting Information, section 4.6). As we typically find between 1 and
4 mechanophore activation events in our force–extension curves,
this indicates that not all mechanophore elements are activated before
the polymer dissociates from the surface. Considering a typical covalent
bond length of 1.5 Å, we can make a rough estimate of the contour
length of between 26 nm for 4.5 mechanophore units and 33 nm for 5.9
mechanophore units, in good agreement with the contour lengths determined
from our extensible wormlike chain fits, across all three retraction
velocities (Figure S29).We further
made a distribution of the polymer extension length
at the point of mechanophore activation (Figure S30), and we find that the polymers are typically stretched
to a length of 20–40 nm when mechanophore activation occurs.
These extension lengths are remarkably close to the contour lengths
we found in the GPC analysis, which implies that the polymers are
often stretched to a length close to their contour lengths. In this
regime, enthalpic contributions to the force–extension behavior
become important, as the polymer bonds themselves are being stretched.
Such enthalpic contributions are not accounted for by the standard
wormlike chain typically used to describe the PEG force–extension
behavior. For this reason, we specifically chose to analyze the force–extension
curves with the extensible wormlike chain model, which accounts for
the enthalpic contributions by the enthalpic compliance parameter K.We record the dissociation force for each mechanophore
activation
event as the amplitude of force drop at rupture. Rupture force distributions
are well described by a Gaussian shape for all three retraction velocities
(Figure d) and show
how TASN activation is peaked at forces of 100 pN, well below those
reported for other covalent mechanophores studied previously.[10,31−33] Moreover, this is an order of magnitude below the
dissociation forces reported for stable C–C bonds,[34] further supporting the notion that the central
scissile bond in TASN is very labile.The average rupture force
increases somewhat with the tip retraction
velocity. This is in agreement with the Bell–Evans picture
that describes mechanical bond scission as a thermally activated process
whose energy landscape is tilted by the action of mechanical stress.[35,36] To compare our data to this model, we first extract the loading
rate r, defined as the
rate of force increase at the moment of bond dissociation, from fits
to the extension curve for each individual event. This results in
a single point in a (r, F) diagram for each rupture event as shown in Figure a. Increasing the
retraction velocity will on average lead to larger loading rates as
well as larger rupture forces. To quantify this trend, we compute
the rupture force and loading rate of each activation event, and we
represent these events as the data cloud in Figure a. We then fit this data cloud with the Bell–Evans
model, which predicts the following logarithmic relationship between
the loading rate and the activation force:[35,36]where k0 is the
zero-force bond dissociation rate and Δx‡ is the activation length. The activation length defines
how steeply the energy landscape tilts under mechanical stress and
is thus a measure for the susceptibility of a particular mechanophore
to force-induced activation. The accurate determination of these parameters
requires a large amount of activation events spread over multiple
orders of magnitudes of loading rates. The loading rate range we sample
is somewhat limited to 2 orders of magnitude because of the limited
number of retract velocities we tested. However, because we sample
a large amount of data points over this range, we can still get an
estimaton of the parameters k0 and Δx‡. We find that our data are consistent
with the Bell–Evans description in eq (see Figure a) for Δx‡ = 0.82 Å and a zero-force dissociation rate of k0 = 7.0 s–1.
Figure 4
(a) Data cloud of the
bond rupture events collected at each of
the tip retraction velocities (0.35, 0.71, and 1.44 μ ms–1) pooled together, showing the rupture force F versus the force rate at the moment of bond rupture r. A Bell–Evans fit
(eq ) was plotted through
the data to determine the constants k0 and Δx‡. (b) Force–lifetime
plot obtained by transforming the rupture force histograms from Figure d with the Dudko–Hummer–Szabo
method.[38] Fits of eq are shown for different values of the scaling
factor α.
(a) Data cloud of the
bond rupture events collected at each of
the tip retraction velocities (0.35, 0.71, and 1.44 μ ms–1) pooled together, showing the rupture force F versus the force rate at the moment of bond rupture r. A Bell–Evans fit
(eq ) was plotted through
the data to determine the constants k0 and Δx‡. (b) Force–lifetime
plot obtained by transforming the rupture force histograms from Figure d with the Dudko–Hummer–Szabo
method.[38] Fits of eq are shown for different values of the scaling
factor α.On the basis of the raw data,
we obtained an estimated rupture
force for TASN of ∼100–150, depending on the loading
rate. However, since we perform our analysis on multi-mechanophore
chains, the rupture probability of the first event differs from subsequent
events.[37] A first-order correction for
this effect can be done by using the approach suggested by Evans and
Williams, in which the measured rupture force in a multiblock chain F and the rupture force of
the individual mechanophore units F1 are
related as F = F1 – Fβ ln N, where Fβ is the thermal force and N the number of TASN subunits
in the chain.[37] The thermal force was previously
estimated to be Fβ ≈ 20 pN,[24] and we observe ⟨N⟩
≈ 5 as discussed above on the basis of our AFM and GPC data.
This leads to a correction of ∼+30 pN on the TASN rupture force
and a single-mechanophore rupture force at 130–180 pN, which
is substantially lower than the common mechanophore spiropyran (SP),[10] which exhibits a rupture force at 240–260
pN. Moreover, TASN has a much lower k0 than SP, indicating a much more dynamic and weaker scissile bond,
and its relatively large value for Δx‡ = 0.82 Å points to a good susceptibility of this mechanophore
to force-induced activation, albeit less so than spiropyran for which
it was reported that Δx‡ =
2.0 Å.Because these mechanophores exist in a dynamic equilibrium
between
inactive and active forms, which is shifted by the application of
a force, it is instructive not only to consider a “typical”
rupture force but also to study the kinetics of the conversion of
the inactive to the active form. Using a theoretical framework proposed
by Dudko, Hummer, and Szabo, here abbreviated the DHS method, an estimation
of the change in bond lifetime with the applied force can be obtained
from the force ramp experiments.[38] Using
the DHS method, we transform the rupture force distributions (Figure d), having the value
of r from the fit of
the extension curve, into the force–bond lifetime curves, as
shown in Figure b.
We note that the sparse data >300 pN (Figure d) are not taken into account here as the
number of events is too limited for an accurate conversion. We find
that the data collected at the three retraction velocities collapse
onto a single master curve within experimental uncertainty. This collapse
of the data sets onto a single curve supports the validity of using
the DHS method to obtain bond lifetime information from force-ramp
experiments.[38] We fit the thus obtained
force–lifetime curves to a modified Bell–Evans equation
that takes into account the shape of the energy landscape:[39]Here, τ denotes the bond lifetime, with
τ0 its value at zero force, x‡ is the activation length, and β = 1/kBT. Equation takes into account the shape of the energy
barrier ΔG‡ for mechanophore
activation, through the parameter α. For a harmonic potential
well with a barrier that is cusplike, α = 1/2. For a square
barrier α = 1, and Equation simplifies back to the Bell–Evans equation
for the lifetime: τ(F) = τ0 exp[−βFx‡].[39] To investigate the extent to which the shape
of the energy barrier affects the bond lifetime, we fit Equation to the force–lifetime
curve for three fixed values for α (lines in Figure b). In general, Equation gives a good description
of our data set, with the exception of the low force data points recorded
at 0.35 μm s–1. As we detected comparatively
few dissociation events at forces below 50 pN and above 200 pN, we
might expect our lifetime calculations to show larger errors in these
regimes (Figure d).
It should further be noted that eq becomes invalid at force F = ΔG‡/αx‡,[38] where eq predicts an unphysical divergence of τ. Our
fits are therefore shown only in the regime before this unphysical
increase occurs.The three fits provide zero-force bond lifetimes
in the range of
τ0 = 0.14–0.17 s. Mechanical tension accelerates
bond dissociation, leading to lifetimes as low as 10–3 s at the largest forces explored of 300 pN. These lifetimes are
short compared to stable covalent bonds and more comparable to supramolecular
interactions;[24] the central succinonitrile
bond in the TASN mechanophore thus behaves as a dynamic covalent bond.
For the fit parameters we find for fixed values α of 1/2, 2/3,
and 3/4 the values τ0 = 0.14, 0.17, and 0.14 s, x‡ = 1.0, 0.96, and 0.86 Å, and ΔG‡ = 5.9 kBT, 5.4 kBT, and 5.2 kBT, respectively.
These results for the activation length are of the same order of magnitude
as those described above. On the basis of our finding that x‡ and ΔG‡ are not constant across the range of α values fitted, we conclude
that the kinetics of mechanophore activation are not governed by the
height and position of the energy barrier alone, but its shape plays
an important role as well.The short activation time scales
of the TASN mechanophore establish
it as a dynamic covalent bond. These are bonds that in spite of their
covalent nature can quickly switch between various states on short
time scales.[40,41] This relatively uncommon type
of bond has found its uses in material science both as a way of providing
useful material properties such as self-healing,[42−44] shape memory,[45,46] and thermal reversibility[47] and as a
way of introducing sensing properties for triggers such as temperature
or mechanical force.[5,48]Here we have conducted
a detailed characterization of the force-induced
mechanical activation of a tetraaryl succinonitrile (TASN) fluorescent
mechanophore at the single-molecule level. Our results reveal that
TASN is a useful candidate for mechanical damage reporting because
of its low threshold forces for activation of 130–180 pN, fast
bond kinetics at time scales on the order of seconds or below, large
mechanical susceptibility as evidenced by its relatively large activation
length, and reversibility. Previous studies have also shown how thermally
or optically generated TASN radicals can be used as initiators for
polymerization reactions.[49] This opens
the opportunity that TASN not only can be used to report damage but
also can be utilized to create chemically active radicals in responsive
to mechanical stress in materials at low forces, which could in turn
be harnessed to activate polymerizations that locally reinforce a
material at a site of damage and slow down damage accumulation.[50]
Authors: Lei Shi; Chao Jing; Wei Ma; Da-Wei Li; Jonathan E Halls; Frank Marken; Yi-Tao Long Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Yulan Chen; A J H Spiering; S Karthikeyan; Gerrit W M Peters; E W Meijer; Rint P Sijbesma Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2012-06-03 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Hope M Klukovich; Tatiana B Kouznetsova; Zachary S Kean; Jeremy M Lenhardt; Stephen L Craig Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2012-12-23 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Matías Horst; Jinghui Yang; Jan Meisner; Tatiana B Kouznetsova; Todd J Martínez; Stephen L Craig; Yan Xia Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 15.419