| Literature DB >> 35085316 |
Ahlam Khalofah1,2, Hamed A Ghramh1,2,3, Rahmah N Al-Qthanin1,4, Boullbaba L'taief1,5.
Abstract
Wildfires significantly alter soil properties and result in vegetation shifts; therefore, rapid reforestation activities are needed in the forests affected by wildfires. The decreased nutrient in the soil is the obvious effect of wildfires; however, little is known about the reforestation of Juniper (Juniperus procera) forests with application of NPK fertilizers. Juniper forests are common in Asir and Taif regions of Saudi Arabia and vulnerable to wildfires; thus, reforestation is needed after the onset of fires. This study assessed the impact of different doses of organic NPK fertilizer (0, 5 and 10 g/L) on growth and nutrient accumulation of Juniper trees grown on fire-damaged and intact soils. Data relating to tree height, number of leaves per plant, fresh and dry biomass accumulation in shoot and root, chlorophyll contents and uptake of N, P, K, and Na were recorded. Individual and interactive effects of soil types and fertilizer doses significantly altered all measured traits with minor exceptions. Overall, higher values of the measured traits were recorded for intact soil and 10 g/L fertilize dose. The increasing fertilizer doses improved the growth and nutrient acquisition and application of 10 g/L fertilizer on intact soil recorded the highest values of growth traits. Juniper trees grown on fire-damaged soil accumulated higher amount of nitrogen than intact soil. Similarly, the trees grown on intact soil accumulated lower amount of Na and maintained comparable K/Na ratio to intact soil. It is concluded that supplying 10 g/L fertilizer could improve the establishment of Juniper trees on fire-damaged soil. Therefore, organic fertilizer can be used to improve the reforestation of wildfire-affected Juniper forests in the Asir province.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35085316 PMCID: PMC8794100 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Soil properties, carbon and nitrogen stock in fire-damaged and intact soils used in the study at the time of initiation of the experiment.
| Soil property | Fire-damaged soil | Intact soil |
|---|---|---|
|
| 51.21 ± 0.56 | 50.90 ± 0.72 |
|
| 34.12 ± 0.41 | 32.70 ± 0.62 |
|
| 14.67 ± 0.48 | 17.40 ± 0.45 |
|
| 1.45 ± 0.12 | 1.47 ± 0.11 |
|
| 8.13 ± 0.09 | 8.01 ± 0.19 |
|
| 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.24 ± 0.03 |
|
| 188.45 ± 10.21 | 225.91 ± 11.23 |
|
| 14.45 ± 1.21 | 23.41 ± 1.15 |
|
| 167.89 ± 12.45 | 233.23 ± 11.32 |
|
| 14.45 ± 1.94 | 23.98 ± 2.32 |
|
| 1.46 ± 0.03 | 2.21 ± 0.08 |
Analysis of variance of different growth traits of Juniperus procera trees as affected by different soil types and NPK concentrations.
| Source of variation | DF | Sum of squares | Mean squares | F value | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 202.74 | 202.74 | 518.22 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 97.94 | 48.97 | 125.17 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 10.72 | 5.36 | 13.70 | 0.0008 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 40.38 | 40.38 | 72.12 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 446.31 | 223.16 | 398.53 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 6.46 | 3.23 | 5.77 | 0.0176 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 299.23 | 299.23 | 523.50 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 486.56 | 243.28 | 425.62 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 12.15 | 6.08 | 10.63 | 0.0022 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 239.22 | 239.22 | 546.36 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 246.71 | 123.36 | 281.73 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 27.33 | 13.67 | 31.21 | < 0.0001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 135.85 | 135.85 | 761.25 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 255.00 | 127.50 | 714.48 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 20.71 | 10.35 | 58.02 | < 0.0001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 86.51 | 86.51 | 617.70 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 218.58 | 109.29 | 780.39 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 24.20 | 12.10 | 86.40 | < 0.0001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.8771NS |
|
| 2 | 83.37 | 41.69 | 111.32 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 13.23 | 6.62 | 17.67 | 0.0003 |
NS = non-significant,
* = significant
The influence of different NPK doses on growth and biomass accumulation of juniper tree grown on two different soil types.
| TH (cm) | Nleaves (plant-1) | SFW (g) | RFW (g) | SDW (g) | RDW (g) | RWC (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
|
| 33.30 b | 52.50 b | 26.68 b | 14.84 b | 13.29 b | 7.89 b | 86.45 NS |
|
| 40.02 a | 55.49 a | 34.83 a | 22.13 a | 18.78 a | 12.28 a | 86.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| 33.79 c | 48.11 c | 24.42 c | 14.33 c | 11.81 c | 6.14 c | 84.06 c |
|
| 36.71 b | 53.59 b | 30.72 b | 17.83 b | 15.36 b | 9.51 b | 86.09 b |
|
| 39.50 a | 60.29 a | 37.15 a | 23.32 a | 20.96 a | 14.62 a | 89.29 a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Means with different letters significantly differ from each other (p<0.05). Here, Nleaves = number of leaves per plant, SFW = shoot fresh weight, RFW = root fresh weight, SDW = shoot dry weight, RDW = root dry weight, RWC = relative water contents, NS = non-significant
Fig 1The impact of different NPK doses on tree height and number of leaves per plant of Juniper tree grown on fire-damaged and non-damaged soils.
Fig 3The impact of different NPK doses on relative water and chlorophyll (a, b and total) contents of Juniper tree grown on fire-damaged and non-damaged soils.
Analysis of variance of different soil types and NPK doses for chlorophyll contents and nutrient acquisition traits of juniper tree.
| Source of variation | DF | Sum of squares | Mean squares | F value | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 44.94 | 44.94 | 152.81 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 621.22 | 310.61 | 1056.28 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 1.48 | 0.74 | 2.52 | 0.1220NS |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 21.91 | 21.91 | 67.26 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 1052.11 | 526.05 | 1614.79 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 62.83 | 31.42 | 96.44 | < 0.0001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 20.14 | 20.14 | 42.21 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 2180.13 | 1090.07 | 2284.35 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 324.48 | 162.24 | 339.99 | < 0.0001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 83.51 | 83.51 | 643.51 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 241.32 | 120.66 | 929.83 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 17.56 | 8.78 | 67.65 | < 0.0001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 61.09 | 61.09 | 158.31 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 400.86 | 200.43 | 519.42 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 2.75 | 1.37 | 3.56 | 0.0610 NS |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 79.13 | 79.13 | 315.94 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 171.62 | 85.81 | 342.63 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 4.27 | 2.13 | 8.52 | 0.0050 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 10.16 | 10.16 | 160.40 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 12.12 | 6.06 | 95.74 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 3.81 | 1.91 | 30.10 | < 0.0001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 7.88 | 0.0159 NS |
|
| 2 | 27.82 | 13.91 | 299.35 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 2 | 0.41 | 0.20 | 4.41 | 0.0367 |
* = significant,
NS = non-significant, DF = degree of freedom
Fig 5The impact of different NPK doses on potassium sodium ratio of Juniper tree grown on fire-damaged and non-damaged soils.
Fig 4The impact of different NPK doses on nutrient accumulation of Juniper tree grown on fire-damaged and non-damaged soils.