Literature DB >> 35083618

A Deep Learning-Based and Fully Automated Pipeline for Thoracic Aorta Geometric Analysis and Planning for Endovascular Repair from Computed Tomography.

Simone Saitta1, Francesco Sturla1,2, Alessandro Caimi1, Alessandra Riva1,2, Maria Chiara Palumbo1, Giovanni Nano3, Emiliano Votta1,2, Alessandro Della Corte4, Mattia Glauber5, Dante Chiappino6, Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta7, Alberto Redaelli1.   

Abstract

Feasibility assessment and planning of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) require computed tomography (CT)-based analysis of geometric aortic features to identify adequate landing zones (LZs) for endograft deployment. However, no consensus exists on how to take the necessary measurements from CT image data. We trained and applied a fully automated pipeline embedding a convolutional neural network (CNN), which feeds on 3D CT images to automatically segment the thoracic aorta, detects proximal landing zones (PLZs), and quantifies geometric features that are relevant for TEVAR planning. For 465 CT scans, the thoracic aorta and pulmonary arteries were manually segmented; 395 randomly selected scans with the corresponding ground truth segmentations were used to train a CNN with a 3D U-Net architecture. The remaining 70 scans were used for testing. The trained CNN was embedded within computational geometry processing pipeline which provides aortic metrics of interest for TEVAR planning. The resulting metrics included aortic arch centerline radius of curvature, proximal landing zones (PLZs) maximum diameters, angulation, and tortuosity. These parameters were statistically analyzed to compare standard arches vs. arches with a common origin of the innominate and left carotid artery (CILCA). The trained CNN yielded a mean Dice score of 0.95 and was able to generalize to 9 pathological cases of thoracic aortic aneurysm, providing accurate segmentations. CILCA arches were characterized by significantly greater angulation (p = 0.015) and tortuosity (p = 0.048) in PLZ 3 vs. standard arches. For both arch configurations, comparisons among PLZs revealed statistically significant differences in maximum zone diameters (p < 0.0001), angulation (p < 0.0001), and tortuosity (p < 0.0001). Our tool allows clinicians to obtain objective and repeatable PLZs mapping, and a range of automatically derived complex aortic metrics.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aorta; Automatic segmentation; CT; Computational geometry; TEVAR

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35083618      PMCID: PMC8921448          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00535-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  24 in total

Review 1.  Endografting of the aortic arch.

Authors:  Shin Ishimaru
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.487

2.  Sources of error in the measurement of aortic diameter in computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Juan Parodi; Ramon Berguer; Patricia Carrascosa; Khalil Khanafer; Carlos Capunay; Eric Wizauer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Magnitude and direction of pulsatile displacement forces acting on thoracic aortic endografts.

Authors:  C Alberto Figueroa; Charles A Taylor; Allen J Chiou; Victoria Yeh; Christopher K Zarins
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 4.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  ITK-SNAP: An Intractive Medical Image Segmentation Tool to Meet the Need for Expert-Guided Segmentation of Complex Medical Images.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Guido Gerig
Journal:  IEEE Pulse       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.924

6.  A geometric reappraisal of proximal landing zones for thoracic endovascular aortic repair according to aortic arch types.

Authors:  Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta; Hector W de Beaufort; Francesco Secchi; Theodorus M van Bakel; Marco Ranucci; Joost A van Herwaarden; Frans L Moll; Santi Trimarchi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Proximal Landing Zones for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in the Bovine Arch Variant.

Authors:  Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta; Rodrigo M Romarowski; Moad Alaidroos; Francesco Sturla; Mattia Glauber; Giovanni Nano
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.466

8.  Trends and outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with open concomitant cervical debranching.

Authors:  Kirthi S Bellamkonda; Sameh Yousef; Naiem Nassiri; Alan Dardik; Raul J Guzman; Arnar Geirsson; Cassius I Ochoa Chaar
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Prevalence of Bovine Aortic Arch Variant in Patients with Aortic Dissection and its Implications in the Outcome of Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Spyridon N Mylonas; Arthurs Barkans; Marius Ante; Jens Wippermann; Dietmar Böckler; Jan Sigge Brunkwall
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 7.069

10.  3D Automatic Segmentation of Aortic Computed Tomography Angiography Combining Multi-View 2D Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Alice Fantazzini; Mario Esposito; Alice Finotello; Ferdinando Auricchio; Bianca Pane; Curzio Basso; Giovanni Spinella; Michele Conti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.495

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.