Francesco Castagnini1,2, Barbara Bordini3, Monica Cosentino3, Cristina Ancarani3, Stefano Lucchini4, Giovanni Bracci4, Francesco Traina4,5. 1. Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d'anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy. francescocastagnini@hotmail.it. 2. DIBINEM University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. francescocastagnini@hotmail.it. 3. Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy. 4. Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d'anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy. 5. Orthopaedics and Traumatology, DIBINEM University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Condylar constrained knee arthroplasties (CCKAs) and rotating hinge knee arthroplasties (RHKAs) achieved good outcomes in complex primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs); however, long-term comparative studies are few. Using an arthroplasty registry, we sought to assess and compare in CCKAs and RHKAs: (1) the intra-operative rates of complications, (2) the survival rates, (3) the reasons for revision, and (4) the adjusted hazard ratios for failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1432 constrained implants in primary TKAs performed for non-oncological indications were included: 703 RHKAs, 729 CCKAs. The two groups were comparable regarding age and gender. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival rates, multivariate analyses to assess the hazard ratios for failures. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 4.1 years (range 0-16.3) for CCKAs and 6.8 years (0-18.1) for RHKAs. The intra/peri-operative complications were similar in both the cohorts, with similar rates of femoral and tibial fractures. 10-year implant survival rates were similar in both the cohorts (91.9%, CI 95% 89.2-93.9% in RHKAs; 93.4%, CI 95% 90.3-95.6% in CCKAs). Periprosthetic infection was the most common reason for revision in the two cohorts, followed by aseptic loosening. Breakage occurred in 3 RHKAs (0.4%). CCKAs and RHKAs had a similar distribution of revision causes. Males aged less than 60 had significantly more failures, regardless the constraint degree. Unstemmed CCKAs significantly failed more than RHKAs and stemmed CCKAs. CONCLUSIONS: Both modern CCKAs and RHKAs are viable long-term solutions in complex primary TKAs. More failures should be expected in males aged less than 60. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Therapeutic study.
INTRODUCTION: Condylar constrained knee arthroplasties (CCKAs) and rotating hinge knee arthroplasties (RHKAs) achieved good outcomes in complex primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs); however, long-term comparative studies are few. Using an arthroplasty registry, we sought to assess and compare in CCKAs and RHKAs: (1) the intra-operative rates of complications, (2) the survival rates, (3) the reasons for revision, and (4) the adjusted hazard ratios for failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1432 constrained implants in primary TKAs performed for non-oncological indications were included: 703 RHKAs, 729 CCKAs. The two groups were comparable regarding age and gender. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival rates, multivariate analyses to assess the hazard ratios for failures. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 4.1 years (range 0-16.3) for CCKAs and 6.8 years (0-18.1) for RHKAs. The intra/peri-operative complications were similar in both the cohorts, with similar rates of femoral and tibial fractures. 10-year implant survival rates were similar in both the cohorts (91.9%, CI 95% 89.2-93.9% in RHKAs; 93.4%, CI 95% 90.3-95.6% in CCKAs). Periprosthetic infection was the most common reason for revision in the two cohorts, followed by aseptic loosening. Breakage occurred in 3 RHKAs (0.4%). CCKAs and RHKAs had a similar distribution of revision causes. Males aged less than 60 had significantly more failures, regardless the constraint degree. Unstemmed CCKAs significantly failed more than RHKAs and stemmed CCKAs. CONCLUSIONS: Both modern CCKAs and RHKAs are viable long-term solutions in complex primary TKAs. More failures should be expected in males aged less than 60. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Therapeutic study.
Authors: Umberto Cottino; Matthew P Abdel; Kevin I Perry; Kristin C Mara; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Paul Baker; Rebecca Critchley; Andrew Gray; Simon Jameson; Paul Gregg; Andrew Port; David Deehan Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Ali Abdulkarim; Anna Keane; Shu Yang Hu; Lachlan Glen; Dermot J Murphy Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 2.256