OBJECTIVE: Video-assisted thyroidectomy (VAT) was approved for coverage under the Japanese public health insurance system in 2016. In our department, we introduced VAT in 2018, and we have since been performing the procedure with the assistance of surgical energy devices. We herein summarize our cases undergoing VAT, including a review of points to consider when introducing the procedure, and characteristics of the surgical energy devices. METHODS: We enrolled 24 patients (14 women and 10 men; age: 24-83 years; mean: 59.0 years) with thyroid/parathyroid tumors who underwent VAT between January 2018 and March 2021 at our department. The medical records of the patients were reviewed, and demographic data, clinical characteristics, histological type, treatment outcomes, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The surgical energy devices used were LigaSure® in the first 4 cases, Acrosurg®. Scissors S17 in the next 13 cases, and Acrosurg®. Revo S15 in the latest 7 cases. The operation time (range: 72-250 min; mean: 147 min), intraoperative blood loss (range: 5-370 mL; mean: 33 mL), indwelling time of wound drain (range: 2-6 days; mean: 3.5 days), and hospitalization period (range: 3-8 days; mean: 5.5 days) were within acceptable ranges. In this study, it is suggested that Acrosurg®. Revo S15 can shorten the indwelling time and the hospitalization period. There were no serious complications, but 1 patient developed transient vocal cord paralysis, which improved 3 months after surgery. It was suggested that the microwave energy devices, Acrosurg®. Scissors S17 and Acrosurg®. Revo S15, may be more effective with respect to sealing/hemostasis/coagulation capacity and controllability than the high-frequency electrosurgical device, LigaSure®. CONCLUSION: Based on this initial experience, VAT using surgical energy devices appeared to be a safe, effective, and minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of thyroid/parathyroid tumors. Further studies confirming these early findings are needed.
OBJECTIVE: Video-assisted thyroidectomy (VAT) was approved for coverage under the Japanese public health insurance system in 2016. In our department, we introduced VAT in 2018, and we have since been performing the procedure with the assistance of surgical energy devices. We herein summarize our cases undergoing VAT, including a review of points to consider when introducing the procedure, and characteristics of the surgical energy devices. METHODS: We enrolled 24 patients (14 women and 10 men; age: 24-83 years; mean: 59.0 years) with thyroid/parathyroid tumors who underwent VAT between January 2018 and March 2021 at our department. The medical records of the patients were reviewed, and demographic data, clinical characteristics, histological type, treatment outcomes, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The surgical energy devices used were LigaSure® in the first 4 cases, Acrosurg®. Scissors S17 in the next 13 cases, and Acrosurg®. Revo S15 in the latest 7 cases. The operation time (range: 72-250 min; mean: 147 min), intraoperative blood loss (range: 5-370 mL; mean: 33 mL), indwelling time of wound drain (range: 2-6 days; mean: 3.5 days), and hospitalization period (range: 3-8 days; mean: 5.5 days) were within acceptable ranges. In this study, it is suggested that Acrosurg®. Revo S15 can shorten the indwelling time and the hospitalization period. There were no serious complications, but 1 patient developed transient vocal cord paralysis, which improved 3 months after surgery. It was suggested that the microwave energy devices, Acrosurg®. Scissors S17 and Acrosurg®. Revo S15, may be more effective with respect to sealing/hemostasis/coagulation capacity and controllability than the high-frequency electrosurgical device, LigaSure®. CONCLUSION: Based on this initial experience, VAT using surgical energy devices appeared to be a safe, effective, and minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of thyroid/parathyroid tumors. Further studies confirming these early findings are needed.