Literature DB >> 35083178

Relation between Oscillometric Measurement of Central Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients.

Masakazu Obayashi1, Shigeki Kobayashi2, Takuma Nanno1, Yoriomi Hamada1, Masafumi Yano2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The augmentation index (AIx) or central systolic blood pressure (SBP), measured by radial applanation tonometry, has been reported to be independently associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in Japanese hypertensive patients. Cuff-based oscillometric measurement of the AIx using Mobil-O-Graph® showed a low or moderate agreement with the AIx measurement with other devices.
METHODS: The AIx measured using the Mobil-O-Graph was validated against the tonometric measurements of the radial AIx measured using HEM-9000AI in 110 normotensive healthy individuals (age, 21-76 years; 50 men). We investigated the relationship between the central hemodynamics assessed using the Mobil-O-Graph and LVH in 100 hypertensive patients (age, 54-75 years; 48 men), presenting a wall thickness of ≥11 mm and ≥10 mm in men and women, respectively.
RESULTS: Although the Mobil-O-Graph-measured central AIx showed no negative values, it correlated moderately with the HEM-9000AI-measured radial AIx (r = 0.602, p < 0.001) in the normotensive individuals. The hypertensive patients did not show a significant difference in the central SBP between the sexes, but the central AIx was lower in men than in women. The independent determinants influencing left ventricle (LV) mass index (LVMI) (R2 = 0.362; adjusted R2 = 0.329, p < 0.001) were heart rate (β = -0.568 ± 0.149, p < 0.001), central SBP (β = 0.290 ± 0.100, p = 0.005), and aortic root diameter (β = 1.355 ± 0.344, p = 0.001). Age (β = -0.025 ± 0.124, p = 0.841) and the central AIx (β = 0.120 ± 0.131, p = 0.361) were not independently associated with the LVMI. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the central AIx for the presence of LVH (LVMI >118 g/m2 in men or >108 g/m2 in women) was statistically significant in men (0.875, p < 0.001) but not in women (0.622, p = 0.132). In men, a central AIx of 28.06% had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 80.0% for detecting LVH.
CONCLUSIONS: AIx measurement in men provided useful prognostic information for the presence of LVH. Pulse-wave analysis assessed using the Mobil-O-Graph may be a valuable tool for detecting LVH in hypertensive patients.
Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmentation index; Central systolic blood pressure; Left ventricular hypertrophy

Year:  2021        PMID: 35083178      PMCID: PMC8740281          DOI: 10.1159/000520006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulse (Basel)        ISSN: 2235-8668


  32 in total

1.  A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods.

Authors:  Johannes Baulmann; Ulrich Schillings; Susanna Rickert; Sakir Uen; Rainer Düsing; Miklos Illyes; Attila Cziraki; Georg Nickering; Thomas Mengden
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Relations between aortic stiffness and left ventricular structure and function in older participants in the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility--Reykjavik Study.

Authors:  Vanessa Bell; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Jos J M Westenberg; John D Gotal; Alyssa A Torjesen; Thor Aspelund; Lenore J Launer; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Albert de Roos; Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Comparison of central blood pressure and cardio-ankle vascular index for association with cardiac function in treated hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Hisashi Masugata; Shoichi Senda; Hiroyuki Okuyama; Koji Murao; Michio Inukai; Naohisa Hosomi; Kazushi Yukiiri; Akira Nishiyama; Masakazu Kohno; Fuminori Goda
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method.

Authors:  S Wassertheurer; J Kropf; T Weber; M van der Giet; J Baulmann; M Ammer; B Hametner; C C Mayer; B Eber; D Magometschnigg
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Prevalence and correlates of aortic root dilatation in patients with essential hypertension: relationship with cardiac and extracardiac target organ damage.

Authors:  Cesare Cuspidi; Stefano Meani; Veronica Fusi; Cristiana Valerio; Carla Sala; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Enhanced radial late systolic pressure augmentation in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Junichiro Hashimoto; Daisuke Watabe; Rieko Hatanaka; Tomohiro Hanasawa; Hirohito Metoki; Kei Asayama; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Kazuhito Totsune; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Measurement of central augmentation index by three different methods and techniques: Agreement among Arteriograph, Complior, and Mobil-O-Graph devices.

Authors:  Theodore G Papaioannou; John Thymis; Dimitrios Benas; Helen Triantafyllidi; Gavriela Kostelli; George Pavlidis; Fotini Kousathana; Kostantinos Katogiannis; Dimitrios Vlastos; Vaia Lambadiari; Evangelia Papadavid; John Parissis; Dimitrios Tousoulis; Ignatios Ikonomidis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Limitations of augmentation index in the assessment of wave reflection in normotensive healthy individuals.

Authors:  Alun D Hughes; Chloe Park; Justin Davies; Darrel Francis; Simon A McG Thom; Jamil Mayet; Kim H Parker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Abnormal Wave Reflections and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Late After Coarctation of the Aorta Repair.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Rebekah Short; Bejal Pandya; Jennifer A Steeden; Abbas Khushnood; Andrew M Taylor; Patrick Segers; Vivek Muthurangu
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Aortic reservoir pressure corresponds to cyclic changes in aortic volume: physiological validation in humans.

Authors:  Martin G Schultz; Justin E Davies; Ashutosh Hardikar; Simon Pitt; Michela Moraldo; Niti Dhutia; Alun D Hughes; James E Sharman
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 8.311

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Risk of Target Organ Damage in Different Phenotypes of Arterial Stiffness and Central Aortic Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Yaya Bai; Qian Wang; Di Cheng; Yueliang Hu; Huijuan Chao; Alberto Avolio; Biwen Tang; Junli Zuo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.