Literature DB >> 35082974

INTEGRATIVE RADIOMICS MODELS TO PREDICT BIOPSY RESULTS FOR NEGATIVE PROSTATE MRI.

Haoxin Zheng1,2, Qi Miao1, Steven S Raman1, Fabien Scalzo2,3, Kyunghyun Sung1.   

Abstract

Multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) is a powerful non-invasive tool for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) and is widely recommended to be performed before prostate biopsies. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version (PI-RADS) is used to interpret mpMRI. However, when the pre-biopsy mpMRI is negative, PI-RADS 1 or 2, there exists no consensus on which patients should undergo prostate biopsies. Recently, radiomics has shown great abilities in quantitative imaging analysis with outstanding performance on computer-aid diagnosis tasks. We proposed an integrative radiomics-based approach to predict the prostate biopsy results when pre-biopsy mpMRI is negative. Specifically, the proposed approach combined radiomics features and clinical features with machine learning to stratify positive and negative biopsy groups among negative mpMRI patients. We retrospectively reviewed all clinical prostate MRIs and identified 330 negative mpMRI scans, followed by biopsy results. Our proposed model was trained and validated with 10-fold cross-validation and reached the negative predicted value (NPV) of 0.99, the sensitivity of 0.88, and the specificity of 0.63 in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Compared with results from existing methods, ours achieved 11.2% higher NPV and 87.2% higher sensitivity with a cost of 23.2% less specificity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided diagnosis; MRI; prostate cancer; radiomics

Year:  2021        PMID: 35082974      PMCID: PMC8786598          DOI: 10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging        ISSN: 1945-7928


  15 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection.

Authors:  Marcus D Ruopp; Neil J Perkins; Brian W Whitcomb; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?

Authors:  Valeria Panebianco; Giovanni Barchetti; Giuseppe Simone; Maurizio Del Monte; Antonio Ciardi; Marcello Domenico Grompone; Riccardo Campa; Elena Lucia Indino; Flavio Barchetti; Alessandro Sciarra; Costantino Leonardo; Michele Gallucci; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.

Authors:  Florian A Distler; Jan P Radtke; David Bonekamp; Claudia Kesch; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Kathrin Wieczorek; Marietta Kirchner; Sascha Pahernik; Markus Hohenfellner; Boris A Hadaschik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Predictive Factors of Missed Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers in Men with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  M A Pagniez; V Kasivisvanathan; P Puech; E Drumez; A Villers; J Olivier
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Radiomic features on MRI enable risk categorization of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: Preliminary findings.

Authors:  Ahmad Algohary; Satish Viswanath; Rakesh Shiradkar; Soumya Ghose; Shivani Pahwa; Daniel Moses; Ivan Jambor; Ronald Shnier; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Marley Pulbrock; Andrei S Purysko; Sadhna Verma; Lee Ponsky; Phillip Stricker; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.

Authors:  Joost J M van Griethuysen; Andriy Fedorov; Chintan Parmar; Ahmed Hosny; Nicole Aucoin; Vivek Narayan; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Steve Pieper; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Objective risk stratification of prostate cancer using machine learning and radiomics applied to multiparametric magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Bino Varghese; Frank Chen; Darryl Hwang; Suzanne L Palmer; Andre Luis De Castro Abreu; Osamu Ukimura; Monish Aron; Manju Aron; Inderbir Gill; Vinay Duddalwar; Gaurav Pandey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Which Patients with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Safely Avoid Biopsy for Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Masakatsu Oishi; Toshitaka Shin; Chisato Ohe; Nima Nassiri; Suzanne L Palmer; Manju Aron; Akbar N Ashrafi; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Frank Chen; Vinay Duddalwar; Mariana C Stern; Osamu Ukimura; Inderbir S Gill; Andre Luis de Castro Abreu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.