Literature DB >> 35080901

Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis.

H Saeidi1,2, J D Opfermann2,3, M Kam2,3, S Wei3,4, S Leonard3, M H Hsieh5, J U Kang3,4, A Krieger2,3.   

Abstract

Autonomous robotic surgery has the potential to provide efficacy, safety, and consistency independent of individual surgeon's skill and experience. Autonomous anastomosis is a challenging soft-tissue surgery task because it requires intricate imaging, tissue tracking, and surgical planning techniques, as well as a precise execution via highly adaptable control strategies often in unstructured and deformable environments. In the laparoscopic setting, such surgeries are even more challenging because of the need for high maneuverability and repeatability under motion and vision constraints. Here we describe an enhanced autonomous strategy for laparoscopic soft tissue surgery and demonstrate robotic laparoscopic small bowel anastomosis in phantom and in vivo intestinal tissues. This enhanced autonomous strategy allows the operator to select among autonomously generated surgical plans and the robot executes a wide range of tasks independently. We then use our enhanced autonomous strategy to perform in vivo autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis on porcine models over a 1-week survival period. We compared the anastomosis quality criteria-including needle placement corrections, suture spacing, suture bite size, completion time, lumen patency, and leak pressure-of the developed autonomous system, manual laparoscopic surgery, and robot-assisted surgery (RAS). Data from a phantom model indicate that our system outperforms expert surgeons' manual technique and RAS technique in terms of consistency and accuracy. This was also replicated in the in vivo model. These results demonstrate that surgical robots exhibiting high levels of autonomy have the potential to improve consistency, patient outcomes, and access to a standard surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35080901      PMCID: PMC8992572          DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj2908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Robot        ISSN: 2470-9476


  32 in total

1.  A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents.

Authors:  Slawomir J Marecik; Vivek Chaudhry; Azam Jan; Russell K Pearl; John J Park; Leela M Prasad
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Objective analysis of the accuracy and efficacy of a novel fascial closure device.

Authors:  Christina P Williams; Michael J Rosen; Judy Jin; Michael F McGee; Steve J Schomisch; Jeffery Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 3.  Robotic hair restoration.

Authors:  Paul T Rose; Bernard Nusbaum
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data.

Authors:  Thomas G Weiser; Scott E Regenbogen; Katherine D Thompson; Alex B Haynes; Stuart R Lipsitz; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Towards MRI-Based Autonomous Robotic US Acquisitions: A First Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Christoph Hennersperger; Bernhard Fuerst; Salvatore Virga; Oliver Zettinig; Benjamin Frisch; Thomas Neff; Nassir Navab
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Supriya S Patel; Madhukar S Patel; Sanjit Mahanti; Adrian Ortega; Glenn T Ault; Andreas M Kaiser; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Semi-autonomous image-guided brain tumour resection using an integrated robotic system: A bench-top study.

Authors:  Danying Hu; Yuanzheng Gong; Eric J Seibel; Laligam N Sekhar; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.547

8.  First experience with THE AUTOLAP™ SYSTEM: an image-based robotic camera steering device.

Authors:  Paul J M Wijsman; Ivo A M J Broeders; Hylke J Brenkman; Amir Szold; Antonello Forgione; Henk W R Schreuder; Esther C J Consten; Werner A Draaisma; Paul M Verheijen; Jelle P Ruurda; Yuval Kaufman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Autonomous Laparoscopic Robotic Suturing with a Novel Actuated Suturing Tool and 3D Endoscope.

Authors:  H Saeidi; H N D Le; J D Opfermann; S Leonard; A Kim; M H Hsieh; J U Kang; A Krieger
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom       Date:  2019-08-12

10.  Demonstration of a laparoscopic structured-illumination three-dimensional imaging system for guiding reconstructive bowel anastomosis.

Authors:  Hanh N D Le; Hieu Nguyen; Zhaoyang Wang; Justin Opfermann; Simon Leonard; Axel Krieger; Jin U Kang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.170

View more
  1 in total

1.  Autonomous robotic laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Katrina Ray
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 46.802

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.