| Literature DB >> 35078423 |
Weijing Qi1, Yan Liu2, Huicong Lv1, Jun Ge3, Yucui Meng3, Nan Zhao1, Fuqing Zhao1, Qing Guo4, Jie Hu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies suggest that interpersonal relationships and social support influence the development of postpartum depression and sleep quality for women. However, the effect of support from the husband or the mother-in-law has not been thoroughly validated. The current study examined the relative contribution of marital satisfaction, perceived caring of the mother-in-law, and social support on postpartum depression and sleep quality simultaneously in a path model.Entities:
Keywords: Family relationship; Postpartum depression; Sleep quality; Social support
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35078423 PMCID: PMC8787939 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04392-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Fig. 1Model 1—Hypothesized model. SSRS = Social Support Rating Scale, MS = Marital Satisfaction, PCMIL = Perceived caring of Mother-in-law, EPDS = Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, H(1)(2)(3)(4) = hypotheses(1)(2)(3)(4)
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants (n = 817)
| n | % | # of EPDS> = 10 at subsample level | χ2 | # of PSQI> = 8 at subsample level | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residence | ||||||
| Rural | 70 | 8.57 | 27(38.57%) | 0.269 | 33(47.14%) | 0.093 |
| Urban | 747 | 91.43 | 312(41.77%) | 338(45.25%) | ||
| Age (year) | ||||||
| < =30 | 479 | 58.63 | 211(44.05%) | 3.118 | 220(45.93%) | 0.126 |
| > =31 | 338 | 41.37 | 128(37.87%) | 151(44.67%) | ||
| Educational level | ||||||
| Junior/Senior school | 166 | 20.32 | 76(45.78%) | 6.781* | 76(45.78%) | 0.137 |
| Undergraduate | 566 | 69.28 | 219(38.69%) | 258(45.58%) | ||
| Post-graduate | 85 | 10.4 | 44(51.76%) | 37(43.53%) | ||
| Parity | ||||||
| Primiparous | 457 | 55.94 | 192(42.01%) | 0.115 | 205(44.88%) | 0.128 |
| Multiparous | 360 | 44.06 | 147(40.83%) | 166(46.11%) | ||
| Accidental pregnancy | ||||||
| Yes | 214 | 26.19 | 98(45.79%) | 2.210 | 90(42.06%) | 1.316 |
| No | 603 | 73.81 | 241(39.97%) | 281(46.60%) | ||
*p < 0.05
Means, standard deviations, and the correlation of study variables
| M | SD | EPDS | PSQI | MS | PCMIL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPDS | 8.58 | 5.49 | ||||
| PSQI | 7.35 | 3.59 | .516** | |||
| MS | 84.56 | 9.56 | −.442** | −.301** | ||
| PCMIL | 6.85 | 2.88 | −.309** | −.227** | .296** | |
| SSRS | 38.42 | 5.58 | −.455** | −.357** | .412** | .325** |
Notes: EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, M mean, MS Marital Satisfaction, PCMIL Perceived caring of Mother-in-law, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, SD standard deviations, SSRS Social Support Rating Scale
n = 817
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
Fig. 2Model 2—Final model for the whole sample (N = 817), with standardized beta weights and significance levels. Fit statistics: χ2 = 3.986, P = 0.136; RMSEA = 0.035; CFI = 0.997;TLI = 0.988; SRMR = 0.013. SSRS = Social Support Rating Scale, MS = Marital Satisfaction, PCMIL = Perceived caring of Mother-in-law, EPDS = Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Unstandardized and Standardized regression coefficients and standard errors for all pathways of the final model (n = 817)
| Variable 1 | Variable 2 | B | β | SE | p | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | EPDS | − 0.162 | − 0.282 | 0.035 | 0.000 | −0.350, − 0.216 |
| PCMIL | EPDS | − 0.245 | − 0.129 | 0.034 | 0.000 | − 0.197, − 0.061 |
| SSRS | EPDS | − 0.292 | − 0.297 | 0.034 | 0.000 | − 0.357, − 0.221 |
| SSRS | PSQI | − 0.099 | − 0.154 | 0.035 | 0.000 | − 0.219, − 0.080 |
| EPDS | PSQI | 0.292 | 0.446 | 0.032 | 0.000 | 0.389, 0.512 |
| MS | SSRS | 0.202 | 0.346 | 0.031 | 0.000 | 0.284, 0.409 |
| PCMIL | SSRS | 0.431 | 0.223 | 0.034 | 0.000 | 0.151, 0.283 |
Notes: EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, MS Marital Satisfaction, PCMIL Perceived caring of Mother-in-law, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, SSRS Social Support Rating Scale
Standardized direct, indirect, and total effect of all study pathways (n = 817)
| Pathway | Direct effect β(95% CI) | Indirect effect β(95% CI) | Total effect β(95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| −0.282(−0.350, −0.216) | − 0.103(− 0.132, − 0.073) | −0.385(− 0.449, − 0.321) | |
| −0.129(− 0.197, − 0.061) | −0.066(− 0.094, − 0.042) | −0.195(− 0.258, − 0.124) | |
| −0.297(− 0.357, − 0.221) | – | −0.297(− 0.357, − 0.221) | |
| 0.446(0.389, 0.512) | – | 0.446(0.389, 0.512) | |
| −0.154(− 0.219, − 0.080) | −0.132(− 0.171, − 0.097) | −0.287(− 0.353, − 0.221) | |
| – | − 0.179(− 0.217, − 0.143) | −0.179(− 0.217, − 0.143) | |
| – | − 0.092(− 0.125, − 0.060) | −0.092(− 0.125, − 0.060) |
Notes: EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, MS Marital Satisfaction, PCMIL Perceived caring of Mother-in-law, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, SSRS Social Support Rating Scale