Literature DB >> 20219196

Validation of the Mainland Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Chengdu mothers.

Ying Lau1, Yuqiong Wang, Lei Yin, Kin Sun Chan, Xiujing Guo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Mainland Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) has been validated among antenatal women, subsequent validation among postnatal women is necessary.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the prevalence of postnatal depression and the psychometric characteristics of the Mainland Chinese version of the EPDS among postnatal women.
DESIGN: Two studies were used for validating the EPDS with specific aims. Study I established the psychometric properties of the EPDS by examining the convergent, discriminant and construct validity, internal consistency and stability of the scale. Study II established its sensitivity, specificity and the optimal cut-off score of the EPDS according the DSM-IV-TR criteria using the Structured Clinical Interview.
SETTING: : Four regional public hospitals in Chengdu. PARTICIPANTS: : A convenience sample was composed of 300 and 342 postnatal women in study I and II, respectively.
METHOD: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to evaluate the global functioning of the scale. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and standard SF-12 Health Survey (SF-12) were used to investigate the convergent, discriminant and construct validity. An exploratory factor analysis was used to investigate the structural validity of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was tested the proposed factor module by Linear Structural Relations (LISREL). The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were used to examine the internal consistency and stability of the scale.
RESULTS: The prevalence of postnatal depression was 4.7%. Structural validity revealed a three-factor structure for the EPDS and the CFA showed a good overall fit of this three-factor model. Convergent and construct validity was supported and discriminant validity suggested that the EPDS successfully discriminated among the nondepressed, mildly and clinically depressed groups. The area under curve (AUC) was 89.6% and the logistic estimate for the threshold score was 10.5 (sensitivity, 81.25%; specificity, 80.67%) for clinical depression. The split-half reliability of the EPDS was 0.74, Cronbach's alpha was 0.78 and test-retest reliability was 0.90.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the validity of the Mainland Chinese version of EPDS in identifying postnatal depression among postnatal women in Chengdu by using >10 cut-off point. Because of its brevity and acceptability, it is recommended that the EPDS be used in routine postnatal screening. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20219196     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  25 in total

1.  Subconstructs of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a multi-ethnic inner-city population in the U.S.

Authors:  Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu; Perry E Sheffield; Hsiao-Hsien Leon Hsu; Jonathan Goldstein; Paul C Curtin; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Towards Universal Screening for Postpartum Depression in China: Lessons Learned from a Comprehensive Prevention Programme in Shenzhen.

Authors:  Lei Jiang; Dadong Wu; Siqi Chen; Guanglin Zhao; Yueyun Wang; Weidong Duan; Honglei Liu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-08-10

3.  Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Maternal Postpartum Depression Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Guideline: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pervez Sultan; Kazuo Ando; Rania Elkhateb; Ronald B George; Grace Lim; Brendan Carvalho; Ahish Chitneni; Ray Kawai; Tanya Tulipan; Lindsay Blake; Jessica Coker; James O'Carroll
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  The association of unwanted pregnancy and social support with depressive symptoms in pregnancy: evidence from rural Southwestern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yohannes Dibaba; Mesganaw Fantahun; Michelle J Hindin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Factor structure of the Japanese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the postpartum period.

Authors:  Chika Kubota; Takashi Okada; Branko Aleksic; Yukako Nakamura; Shohko Kunimoto; Mako Morikawa; Tomoko Shiino; Ai Tamaji; Harue Ohoka; Naomi Banno; Tokiko Morita; Satomi Murase; Setsuko Goto; Atsuko Kanai; Tomoko Masuda; Masahiko Ando; Norio Ozaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sociodemographic, obstetric characteristics, antenatal morbidities, and perinatal depressive symptoms: A three-wave prospective study.

Authors:  Ying Lau; Tha Pyai Htun; Ho Keung Dennis Kwong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Serum Metabolic Profiling of Late-Pregnant Women With Antenatal Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Qiang Mao; Tian Tian; Jing Chen; Xunyi Guo; Xueli Zhang; Tao Zou
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  A narrative review of factors influencing detection and treatment of depression in Vietnam.

Authors:  Maria Niemi; Mats Målqvist; Kim Bao Giang; Peter Allebeck; Torkel Falkenberg
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2013-05-06

Review 9.  Comparing the accuracy of brief versus long depression screening instruments which have been validated in low and middle income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dickens Akena; John Joska; Ekwaro A Obuku; Taryn Amos; Seggane Musisi; Dan J Stein
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Antenatal depression in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka and the factor structure of the Sinhalese version of Edinburgh post partum depression scale among pregnant women.

Authors:  Suneth Buddhika Agampodi; Thilini Chanchala Agampodi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.