Maud van Dinther1,2, Paulien Hm Voorter3,4, Jacobus Fa Jansen3,4, Elizabeth Av Jones5, Robert J van Oostenbrugge1,2,4, Julie Staals1,2, Walter H Backes2,3,4. 1. Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands. 2. CARIM - School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands. 4. MHeNs - School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
Cerebral microvascular rarefaction, the reduction in number of functional or structural small blood vessels in the brain, is thought to play an important role in the early stages of microvascular related brain disorders. A better understanding of its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and methods to measure microvascular density in the human brain are needed to develop biomarkers for early diagnosis and to identify targets for disease modifying treatments. Therefore, we provide an overview of the assumed main pathophysiological processes underlying cerebral microvascular rarefaction and the evidence for rarefaction in several microvascular related brain disorders. A number of advanced physiological MRI techniques can be used to measure the pathological alterations associated with microvascular rarefaction. Although more research is needed to explore and validate these MRI techniques in microvascular rarefaction in brain disorders, they provide a set of promising future tools to assess various features relevant for rarefaction, such as cerebral blood flow and volume, vessel density and radius and blood-brain barrier leakage.
Cerebral microvascular rarefaction, the reduction in number of functional or structural small blood vessels in the brain, is thought to play an important role in the early stages of microvascular related brain disorders. A better understanding of its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and methods to measure microvascular density in the human brain are needed to develop biomarkers for early diagnosis and to identify targets for disease modifying treatments. Therefore, we provide an overview of the assumed main pathophysiological processes underlying cerebral microvascular rarefaction and the evidence for rarefaction in several microvascular related brain disorders. A number of advanced physiological MRI techniques can be used to measure the pathological alterations associated with microvascular rarefaction. Although more research is needed to explore and validate these MRI techniques in microvascular rarefaction in brain disorders, they provide a set of promising future tools to assess various features relevant for rarefaction, such as cerebral blood flow and volume, vessel density and radius and blood-brain barrier leakage.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alzheimer’s disease; cerebral small vessel disease; magnetic resonance imaging; microvascular density; microvascular rarefaction
Normal brain function requires a very high energy supply, as is illustrated by the
fact that the brain uses about 20% of total body energy even though it comprises
only 2% of total body mass.
The human cerebral microcirculation consists of approximately 600 kilometers
of capillaries, and the number of endothelial cells in the brain is very similar to
the number of neurons.
Since the brain has little reserve capacity, a reduction in perfusion is
deleterious. There is growing evidence that alterations at the level of the cerebral
microcirculation play a key role in vascular brain diseases and
neurodegeneration.[3,4]Importantly, small vessels such as arterioles and capillaries undergo a reduction in
their number, a phenomenon called rarefaction (Figure 1).
Microvessel density decreases with normal aging, but this process is
accelerated in microvascular brain disorders.
In pathology studies on post-mortem specimens, cerebral microvascular
rarefaction has been demonstrated in animal models of ageing, Alzheimer’s disease
(AD), obesity, hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and the same has been found in
aging humans, AD patients, and humans with white matter hyperintensities (WMH).
Figure 1.
Electron-microscopic view on brain tissue obtained at autopsy. Capillaries
from the CA1 area of the hippocampus, from a human who was neurologically
intact (a). Capillaries from the CA1 area of the hippocampus, from a human
who suffered from AD (b). The capillary density is substantially decreased
in the AD patient (b) in comparison with the healthy control (a). Both
images were taken at 1200x magnification. Source: reproduced with permission
form publisher (2012).
Electron-microscopic view on brain tissue obtained at autopsy. Capillaries
from the CA1 area of the hippocampus, from a human who was neurologically
intact (a). Capillaries from the CA1 area of the hippocampus, from a human
who suffered from AD (b). The capillary density is substantially decreased
in the AD patient (b) in comparison with the healthy control (a). Both
images were taken at 1200x magnification. Source: reproduced with permission
form publisher (2012).Microvascular rarefaction may reveal itself as a functional or structural phenomenon.
Functional rarefaction reflects a reversible reduction in perfused microvessels,
whereas structural rarefaction reflects an actual anatomical loss of microvessels.
A reduction in perfusion likely precedes structural rarefaction.
Reduced perfusion may eventually lead to neural dysfunction and
microstructural tissue damage,
which contribute to neurodegeneration and macrostructural lesions visible on
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Investigating microvascular density directly in the human brain is challenging, since
pathological examination is only possible post-mortem, and the spatial resolution of
the existing medical imaging machines is insufficient for direct visualization of
cerebral capillaries as these are only about 10 µm in diameter. Nonetheless, since
structural rarefaction is preceded or paralleled by functional rarefaction and
microvascular dysfunction, this opens up avenues for measuring rarefaction by
assessing microvascular perfusion and function.In this narrative review, we provide an overview of the literature on microvascular
rarefaction in the human brain. A better understanding of the relevance of
microvascular rarefaction, its underlying mechanisms, and methods to measure
microvascular density in the brain, is needed to develop markers for early diagnosis
and to identify targets for disease modifying treatments. We will first discuss
pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying cerebral microvascular rarefaction, and
evidence of microvascular rarefaction in several brain disorders. Thereafter,
relevant principles of advanced MRI techniques that can be used to study rarefaction
in the human brain including their limitations are explained. We have limited the
scope of this review to MRI approaches that probe physiologic properties in human
vascular disease and aging, since MRI is the most promising and versatile imaging
technique to measure rarefaction, as it can be repeated over time to monitor
changes, and can provide a variety of functional measures on the
microcirculation.
Pathophysiology
Though different processes likely involved in the reduction of microvessels have been
identified, the exact pathophysiology underlying microvascular rarefaction in the
brain is as yet unknown. Most of these processes involve changes in the cells
composing the neurovascular unit,
which is a constellation of microstructural elements that regulates the close
relationship between metabolic demand, blood supply and neuronal activity in the
brain (Figure 2). We
discuss four pathological processes which most likely play an important role in
microvascular rarefaction. A schematic overview of the pathophysiological processes
resulting in rarefaction is presented in Figure 3. Most knowledge about the
pathophysiological processes has been acquired through histologic analysis on
specimens from animal studies, and to a lesser extent through analysis of human
pathological post-mortem samples.
Figure 2.
The neurovascular unit regulates the close relationship between metabolic
demand and neuronal activity in the brain, and is composed of the vascular
endothelium, pericytes, astrocytes, neurons, and extracellular matrix around
the vessels.
The components are intimately and reciprocally linked to each other,
establishing an anatomical and functional unity. The blood-brain barrier,
which is formed by the endothelial cells connected by tight junctions,
pericytes and astrocytes, protects the neuronal microenvironment by
separating harmful components of the blood circulation from neurons, and by
maintaining the chemical composition of the neuronal environment. Neurons
detect variations in oxygen and nutrients supply, and subsequently
communicate with the vessels through astrocytes, thereby influencing the
vascular tone. Anatomically, neurovascular communication takes place through
the astrocyte endfoot, which is a highly specialized astrocyte extension
that is in contact with the surface of pericytes. Functions of pericytes
include stabilizing the vascular wall and maintaining vascular quiescence
and vascular integrity by bidirectional signaling with endothelial cells,
deposition of the basement membrane, providing capillary contraction, and
bridging endothelial gaps. Endothelial cells enclose the vascular lumen, and
produce trophic and vasoactive factors important for vascular health and
tone. Image was created by use of biorender.
Figure 3.
Schematic overview of the pathophysiological processes leading to
microvascular rarefaction. Increased levels of anti-angiogenic factors
induce vessel regression, directly resulting in microvascular rarefaction.
An insufficient increase in pro-angiogenic factors, as well as a resistance
towards pro-angiogenic factors, prevent adequate angiogenesis during
hypoxia. Oxidative stress results in endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis,
both directly leading to microvascular rarefaction. Furthermore, endothelial
dysfunction and apoptosis also indirectly contribute to rarefaction due to
the disturbance in pericyte-endothelial cross-talk leading to pericyte loss,
and via its suppressive effect on angiogenesis. Pericyte loss directly leads
to rarefaction by leaving the vascular wall unprotected and vulnerable, by
the transition to myofibroblasts which promote the loss of capillaries, and
by the loss of the reserve capacity to replenish vascular cells lost during
aging. Micro-embolisms and increased vessel tortuosity result in decreased
shear stress, indirectly leading to microvascular rarefaction by inducing
endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis, as well as impaired angiogenesis.
Image was created by use of biorender.
The neurovascular unit regulates the close relationship between metabolic
demand and neuronal activity in the brain, and is composed of the vascular
endothelium, pericytes, astrocytes, neurons, and extracellular matrix around
the vessels.
The components are intimately and reciprocally linked to each other,
establishing an anatomical and functional unity. The blood-brain barrier,
which is formed by the endothelial cells connected by tight junctions,
pericytes and astrocytes, protects the neuronal microenvironment by
separating harmful components of the blood circulation from neurons, and by
maintaining the chemical composition of the neuronal environment. Neurons
detect variations in oxygen and nutrients supply, and subsequently
communicate with the vessels through astrocytes, thereby influencing the
vascular tone. Anatomically, neurovascular communication takes place through
the astrocyte endfoot, which is a highly specialized astrocyte extension
that is in contact with the surface of pericytes. Functions of pericytes
include stabilizing the vascular wall and maintaining vascular quiescence
and vascular integrity by bidirectional signaling with endothelial cells,
deposition of the basement membrane, providing capillary contraction, and
bridging endothelial gaps. Endothelial cells enclose the vascular lumen, and
produce trophic and vasoactive factors important for vascular health and
tone. Image was created by use of biorender.Schematic overview of the pathophysiological processes leading to
microvascular rarefaction. Increased levels of anti-angiogenic factors
induce vessel regression, directly resulting in microvascular rarefaction.
An insufficient increase in pro-angiogenic factors, as well as a resistance
towards pro-angiogenic factors, prevent adequate angiogenesis during
hypoxia. Oxidative stress results in endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis,
both directly leading to microvascular rarefaction. Furthermore, endothelial
dysfunction and apoptosis also indirectly contribute to rarefaction due to
the disturbance in pericyte-endothelial cross-talk leading to pericyte loss,
and via its suppressive effect on angiogenesis. Pericyte loss directly leads
to rarefaction by leaving the vascular wall unprotected and vulnerable, by
the transition to myofibroblasts which promote the loss of capillaries, and
by the loss of the reserve capacity to replenish vascular cells lost during
aging. Micro-embolisms and increased vessel tortuosity result in decreased
shear stress, indirectly leading to microvascular rarefaction by inducing
endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis, as well as impaired angiogenesis.
Image was created by use of biorender.
Impaired angiogenesis and active capillary regression
Pro-angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and
insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), are essential for endothelial cell
survival and proper microvascular function, and are known to be dysregulated in
microvascular rarefaction.
Vascular density is directly proportional to levels of these proteins.
Indeed, increased expression of VEGF or IGF-1 in rodents is accompanied by an
increase in cerebrovascular capillary density,[12-15] whereas low levels of
these pro-angiogenic substances are associated with microvascular
rarefaction.[13,16] However, cerebral microvascular endothelial cells
derived from aged rodents exhibit an impaired angiogenic response to exogenous
administration of VEGF.
This suggests that endothelial cells becoming resistant to inducers of
angiogenesis, rather than a decline in serum levels of pro-angiogenic factors,
is critical in the pathophysiology of rarefaction.In the adult human brain, however, the vasculature is relatively quiescent and
angiogenesis only occurs in response to hypoxia.
This implies defects in angiogenesis cannot account for the initiation of
capillary rarefaction, though they can account for failed repair response after
microvascular rarefaction has occurred and a state of hypoxia is present. Active
capillary regression is now increasingly being recognized as important in
microvascular rarefaction though its molecular mechanisms remain poorly
understood. Actively regressing vessels can be identified by string vessels,
which are basement membranes without endothelial cells (Figure 4).
Although regression is a normal part of development, improper activation
of regression signals can lead to microvascular rarefaction, and this process
could account for the commencement of it in the absence of hypoxia.
Figure 4.
String vessels (arrows) which represent basement membranes without
endothelial cells in a thick celloidin section of the cerebral white
matter, stained with antibody to collagen IV.
Source: reproduced with permission form publisher (2009).
String vessels (arrows) which represent basement membranes without
endothelial cells in a thick celloidin section of the cerebral white
matter, stained with antibody to collagen IV.Source: reproduced with permission form publisher (2009).Active regression is not simply the result of a lack of pro-angiogenic factors.
Indeed, merely reducing VEGF is not sufficient to initiate or induce capillary
regression, and even in the presence of relatively high levels of VEGF, vessel
regression occurs.
By contrast, negative angiogenic regulators may be the key determinant in
initiating and regulating capillary regression.[21,22] For example, a study
using transgenic mice that overproduce a constitutively active form of
transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) showed an increased number of string
vessels in the cortex and hippocampus in comparison with wild type mice.
Of note, TGF-β1 is shown to be increased in the cerebrospinal fluid and
blood of AD and vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) patients.[24,25]
Furthermore, post-mortem studies that compared the brains of AD patients with
elderly controls have shown string vessels to be increased in AD.[26-30] On the contrary, string
vessels were found to be decreased in cerebral white matter in subjects with WMH.
However, since it is known that string vessels gradually disappear with
time, and the observed decrease in string vessels was greater than the decrease
in capillaries, it was hypothesized that an early loss of capillaries in WMH is
followed by the disappearance of string vessels, so that by the time the subject
dies there are few string vessels left.
Endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis
Cumulative exposure to cardiovascular risk factors leads to oxidative stress by
reactive oxygen species (ROS), causing endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis.
Endothelial dysfunction has been shown to correlate with functional rarefaction,
and apoptotic endothelial cell death is involved in structural capillary rarefaction.
Endothelial injury causes a decreased bioavailability of nitric oxide
(NO), resulting in a reduced arteriolar vasodilator capacity, leading to
decreased blood flow through the capillaries, i.e. functional rarefaction.
Decreased NO production also promotes endothelial apoptosis,
and has been causally linked to an impaired angiogenic capacity of
endothelial cells,
thereby directly contributing to structural rarefaction as well.
Apoptosis of a relatively small proportion of endothelial cells may be
sufficient to mediate significant microvessel rarefaction.
The importance of oxidative stress in the origin of endothelial injury in
the brain is supported by studies showing that attenuation of mitochondrial
oxidative stress using different inhibitors of ROS production increases cerebral
capillary density, restores angiogenic potential in aged rodents,[39,40] and
restores endothelium-mediated vasodilation in the brain of aged mice.[41,42]
Pericyte loss
One of the functions of pericytes is to control capillary tone. Whereas enhanced
activity of pericytes causes capillary contraction and entrapment of erythrocytes,
the loss of pericytes results in dilated capillaries, leading to uneven
and disrupted flow patterns within the network, causing disruptions in capillary
transit time.
Thus, pericytes may play an important role in the functional stage of
microvascular rarefaction. Furthermore, when a disturbance in the
pericyte-endothelial cross-talk appears, pericytes detach from the vascular wall
and migrate into the interstitial space, leaving the vascular wall unprotected
and vulnerable.
In the interstitial space, pericytes undergo a functional transition to
myofibroblasts (scar-forming cells)
or undergo apoptosis.
Preliminary studies have shown that myofibroblasts may promote vascular
leakage and the death of capillaries.[47,48] Hence, pericyte
detachment is deleterious to capillaries in multiple ways and the loss of
pericytes results in structural rarefaction. Pathways involved in
pericyte-endothelial cell disassembly have been reviewed in detail before and
will not be discussed here further.
Lastly, pericytes might serve as a local stem cell population that
replenish differentiated interstitial and vascular cells lost during aging.
The loss of this reparative capacity also promotes capillary rarefaction.
Indeed, in mice models, a reduced pericyte coverage and pericyte number in the
brain have repeatedly been correlated with reduced microvascular
density.[18,50,51] A postmortem study showed a reduced microvessel density
in combination with marked degeneration of pericytes in the hippocampus and
cortex in AD patients in comparison with controls.
Loss of shear stress
Stagnation of blood flow leading to a reduction of shear stress can be caused by
tortuosity of microvessels and vascular blockage by spontaneous microemboli.
Tortuosity of microvessels occurs with aging
and is associated with cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension
and diabetes.[54,55] Microemboli are associated with both AD and vascular dementia.
Decreased shear stress leads to compromised endothelial NO synthase
(eNOS) function in endothelial cells resulting in lower levels of NO, which
initially leads to prolonged periods of functional rarefaction by compromised
vasodilation, and eventually results in structural rarefaction.
Additionally, mechanical forces may play a significant role in
pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic reprogramming. Cyclic strain triggers
endothelial cell programs which result in sprouting angiogenesis and recruitment
of smooth muscle cells.
For example, it has been shown that a lack of blood flow results in loss
of availability of VEGF.
Flow dependent shear forces also provide the survival signal for
endothelial cells and a decrease in shear stress in capillaries facilitates
endothelial apoptosis.
As such, it has been shown that shear stress generated by a flow chamber
attenuates brain microvascular endothelial cell apoptosis in rats.
Hence, a loss of shear stress may present a mechanism linking functional
and structural rarefaction.
Linking the different pathophysiological mechanisms
To provide a structured overview of the pathophysiological pathways involved in
brain microvascular rarefaction, we presented the four main pathophysiological
processes separately. However, these processes are not self-containing, yet
there is a continuous interplay between these processes. Pericytes, for example,
are dependent on cross-talk with endothelial cells for proper functioning, so
endothelial dysfunction or apoptosis will typically be accompanied by pericyte loss.
Endothelial cells are also the key cell type involved in angiogenesis,
hence endothelial malfunction or death will also result in impaired angiogenesis.
A decrease in shear stress, on its turn, leads to impaired angiogenesis
and endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis,[57,59] rather than directly
causing rarefaction. This interdependency leads to self-reinforcement, where
dysfunction in one cell type sets of a chain of events causing further
acceleration of the pathophysiological process. Although a complex interaction
between these processes is probably present, most studies have mainly focused on
a singular process. It is for this reason that the exact sequence and relative
importance of events in the origin of microvascular rarefaction in the human
brain remains elusive.Furthermore, most evidence for these pathophysiological processes of
microvascular rarefaction in the brain comes from animal studies, which can be
regarded as low level evidence, since it is unclear how findings in animals
relate to findings in humans. Although far more research has been conducted in
impaired angiogenesis than in pericyte loss in animal models, pericyte loss and
vessel regression have been confirmed in human post-mortem case-control
studies.[26-30,52] On the other hand, for
impaired angiogenesis, endothelial dysfunction and loss of shear stress,
‘intervention’ studies in animals have been performed to intervene in the
pathophysiological process resulting in higher microvascular density,[12-15,36,39,40] and these could be
regarded as a high level of evidence for the role of these processes.
Evidence for microvascular rarefaction in microvascular brain disorders
Cerebral small vessel disease
cSVD is an umbrella term that covers all pathologies of the cerebral small
vessels. It causes hemorrhagic strokes, ischemic lacunar strokes, VCI and dementia.
One of the typical structural brain lesions that can be seen on MRI are WMH.
The precise pathways in microvascular dysfunction leading to cSVD remain
unclear, but there is growing evidence that microvascular rarefaction plays a
contributing role. Postmortem studies showed that subjects with WMH had a
decreased cerebral microvascular density in comparison with subjects without
WMH.[62,63] In a mouse model of cerebral autosomal dominant
arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), a
mono-genetic type of cSVD, a substantial reduction in white matter capillary
density was shown, and this rarefaction was shown to precede the occurrence of
WMH and to be progressive.
A decline in cerebral microvascular density has also been correlated with
diminished cognitive function in mice.Additionally, microvascular rarefaction in the brain has been shown in rodents
with cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, and
obesity.[65-70] Since these comorbidities
are strongly linked to the development of age- and vascular risk factor
associated cSVD and have been shown to cause cerebral microvascular rarefaction,
this also supports a role of rarefaction in the development of cSVD.
Alzheimer’s disease
AD, a neurodegenerative brain disease, is the most common cause of dementia in
the elderly. Although deposition of amyloid β (Aβ) and hyperphosphorylated
misfolded tau have long been the focus in explaining the molecular cause of AD,
accumulating evidence now suggests that the early stage of AD might be primarily
a microvascular disorder.
Aβ depositions are present in the neurovascular unit and their presence
is associated with microvascular impairment, which contributes to the
development of early-stage pre-plaque cognitive dysfunction as well as
subsequent progression of the disease.[4,71] Furthermore, increased
deposition of Aβ results in degeneration and disappearance of capillaries and
small vessels, i.e. microvascular rarefaction.[72,73] Subsequently, capillary
loss leads to an impaired clearance of Aβ, which further promotes vascular damage.
Aβ accumulations on capillaries may contribute to the reduced brain
capillary density via endothelial apoptosis due to its toxic effects,[75,76] and via
its intrinsic anti-angiogenic activity
and capacity to bind other pro-angiogenic factors such as VEGF.
Several studies have revealed a decreased microvascular density and an
increased number of string vessels in the brain of AD patients.[26,62,79-85]
Ageing
Ageing may not be considered a pathology, but its processes show considerable
overlap with cSVD and neurodegeneration. Numerous studies have shown a decreased
cerebral microvascular density in the brain of healthy aging humans.[26,62,79-81,86,87] Although microvascular
density is lower in younger AD and cSVD cases in comparison with age matched
controls, microvascular density in these patient groups and controls converges
by the ninth decade of life.[6,62] Since microvascular
density also decreases with age in absence of disease, it can be challenging to
distinguish the effect of ageing from disease specific processes in cSVD and
neurodegeneration.
Cognitive impairment following whole brain radiation therapy
Whole brain radiation therapy leads to cognitive impairment in 40-50% of brain
tumor survivors.
Although the etiology of cognitive deficits post whole brain radiation
therapy remains unclear, microvascular rarefaction appears to be an important
contributor. Indeed, whole brain radiation therapy induced profound
microvascular rarefaction in rats and mice,[89,90] and a reduced capillary
density in the hippocampus of these mice is linked to deficits in learning and memory.
It has been shown that brain irradiation induces dose-dependent
endothelial apoptosis, loss of pericytes,
and impaired angiogenesis,
all promoting rarefaction. Therapeutic strategies, such as chronic
systemic hypoxia, restore capillary density and this results in the rescue of
cognitive function.
Microvascular rarefaction: cause or consequence?
During ageing and disease progression, both brain capillaries and neural tissue are
lost. Whereas loss of neural tissue could result in a decreased need for oxygen and
glucose and subsequently might lead to capillary loss, several studies have shown an
increased oxygen extraction from the blood in WMH, suggesting capillary loss occurs
first.[94-96] In
conjunction with this, studies have not only revealed a decreased cerebral blood
flow (CBF) in WMH, but also in undamaged brain regions.[64,97] Likewise, a CBF reduction was
already detectable before any brain lesions appeared.
These findings support a causal role of hypoperfusion rather than a secondary
reduction of perfusion due to a reduced metabolic demand of damaged tissue in the
brain.
MRI methods to measure microvascular rarefaction
This section explains and discusses advanced MRI techniques, which can provide
measures that reflect certain aspects of the pathophysiological pathways associated
with microvascular rarefaction in human. Individual capillaries cannot be visualized
morphologically and the various pathophysiological processes cannot be visualized
directly. Instead, MRI can give a proxy by measuring their functional
characteristics such as microvascular volume and flow, wall permeability,
cerebrovascular reserve capacity, and also sense various sizes of small blood
vessels. These functional MRI measures do not reflect properties of individual
microvessels, but the combined effect of a large number of microvessels in a tissue
region with a size of one or a few cubic millimeters. A summary of the discussed MRI
techniques is provided in Table 1. Moreover, in Table 2 we present an overview of how
these microvascular MRI measures are expected to relate to the four main
pathophysiological processes discussed above.
Table 1.
Summary of MRI techniques.
MRI technique
Principles
Primary output measures
Additional output measures
Contrast agent administration
Measurement of blood supply
DSC-MRI
Dynamically measures magnetic susceptibility changes during the
first passage of contrast agent
Cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, mean transit
time
Capillary transit time heterogeneity
Yes
Yes, arterial input function
Vessel size imaging
Provides the average radius of the small blood vessels within a
voxel by measuring the ratio between ΔR2 and ΔR2*
Mean vessel diameter, vessel size index (or vessel radius), mean
vessel density
–
Yes
No
DCE-MRI
Measures the leakage rate of contrast agent particles from the
blood into the tissue by using a dynamic T1-weighted
measurement
Blood-brain barrier leakage rate
Blood volume fraction and flow
Yes
Yes, arterial or alternatively venous input function
ASL
Measures cerebral blood flow by inverting blood water spins and
measuring this labeled blood when it flows through tissue after
a delay time
Cerebral blood flow
Water exchange rate over blood-brain barrier, cerebral blood
volume, mean transit time, arterial transit time
No
No, but blood in supplying artery is magnetically labeled
IVIM
Simultaneously measures parenchymal diffusion and microvascular
pseudo-diffusion, which is considered to represent the blood
flow through a random network of capillaries
Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) MRI is a technique that measures
hemodynamic characteristics, such as cerebral blood flow and volume. In the DSC
MRI method, multiple spin echo (SE: T2-weighted) or gradient echo (GE:
T2*-weighted) images are acquired with high temporal resolution during an
intravenous bolus injection of a paramagnetic contrast agent (e.g. gadolinium).
This dynamic measurement typically only captures the first passes of the
contrast agent through the brain. The contrast agent particles change the local
homogeneity of the magnetic field (cause T2 and T2* shortening) inside and in
the vicinity of the blood vessels, thereby lowering the signal intensity. The
amount of this signal attenuation is related to the contrast agent
concentration, which enables converting the measured signal intensity curves to
concentration curves over time. Subsequently, the quantification of CBF,
cerebral blood volume (CBV) and mean transit time (MTT) of the contrast agent
through the brain tissue can be obtained by applying a computational hemodynamic
model to the tissue and arterial concentration curves, which also corrects for
the blood supply. A more advanced DSC measure worth mentioning is the capillary
transit time heterogeneity (CTTH), which reflects whether the capillary network
is perfused homogenously.DSC-MRI is widely used in clinical research, since it provides a strong signal
effect between the pre- and post-contrast signal and has a short acquisition
time (2-3 min).
Though DSC-MRI has been well established in clinical research, the
process to obtain quantitative measures is complex and a thorough understanding
of its acquisition parameters, image processing and limitations is needed to
ensure accurate results. Most of these aspects concerning DSC-MRI have
previously been reviewed.GE is different from SE sequences with respect to their sensitivity for vessel
size. GE shows a stronger signal drop, since the GE signal is effected by the
contrast agent in blood vessels of all sizes, whereas the SE signal is most
sensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneities in and around the small blood
vessels (radius <10 μm).[98,100] Accordingly, SE is
found to be more representative when measuring microvascular perfusion
characteristics compared to GE,
and thus is the favorable technique to detect alterations in capillary
perfusion as a proxy for microvascular rarefaction. For example, the relative
CTTH measured by SE was found to correlate with WMH load and cognitive
impairment in an AD cohort, while these same correlations could not be shown
when CTTH was measured by GE.
However, due to the stronger signal modifying effect GE has previously
been more frequently performed than SE. Using GE, hypoperfusion has been
demonstrated in AD patients compared to controls.[103,104] In contrast, however,
few studies found hyperperfusion in prodromal AD (at the stage of mild cognitive
impairment), which was hypothesized to be a compensatory mechanism.[103,104]
Furthermore, a strong negative correlation was found between brain perfusion
measured with GE and cSVD-burden score.
An example of a CBF map measured with DSC MRI in cSVD is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery of cSVD patient (A) and the
corresponding CBF map measured by DSC MRI (B). The CBF is higher in the
cortical grey matter and lower in WMH compared to normal appearing white
matter.
CBF: cerebral blood flow; cSVD: cerebral small vessel disease; DSC MRI:
dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging;
WMH: white matter hyperintesities.Source: reproduced with permission
form publisher (2019).106
Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery of cSVD patient (A) and the
corresponding CBF map measured by DSC MRI (B). The CBF is higher in the
cortical grey matter and lower in WMH compared to normal appearing white
matter.CBF: cerebral blood flow; cSVD: cerebral small vessel disease; DSC MRI:
dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging;
WMH: white matter hyperintesities.Source: reproduced with permission
form publisher (2019).106
Vessel size imaging
Vessel size imaging is an MRI technique that relies on measuring both a SE (for
relaxation rate R2 = 1/T2) and GE (for R2* = 1/T2*) before and after contrast
agent administration. Since SE is more sensitive for small vessels than GE, the
ratio of changes in relaxation rates ΔR2 and ΔR2* is dependent on the density
and the average radius of the small blood vessels, which can be calculated
within a voxel by this technique.
Two measurement approaches can be distinguished in vessel size imaging:
steady state imaging and dynamic imaging.The steady state approach acquires only two R2* and R2 measurements (one pre- and
one post-contrast). During the post-contrast measurement, the contrast agent
concentration in the blood needs to be stable, which is the reason that
ultra-small paramagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) is a more suitable contrast agent
for the steady state approach than gadolinium-based contrast agents (USPIOs have
a slower clearance). The dynamic approach acquires high temporal SE and GE
images before, during and after the contrast agent concentration peak.
Hereafter, the pre- and post-contrast relaxation rates are calculated to obtain
ΔR2* and ΔR2 curves over time. The dynamic approach is preferred in human
research, since gadolinium based contrast agents have considerably less health
risks than USPIOs and the acquisition period can be kept shorter.The measures that can be determined using vessel size imaging are the mean vessel
density (Q), the mean vessel diameter (mVD) and the vessel size index (VSI) or
vessel size radius. Q and mVD are related to the vessel architecture, however,
they are also dependent on the acquisition parameters and on the amount of water
diffusion in the brain, since the amount of parenchymal water diffusion is
related to the amount of signal attenuation of the spin echo. The VSI, expressed
in μm, is a diffusion-corrected measure, hence an additional MRI acquisition
should be performed to determine the tissue diffusion coefficient.
Recommendations for vessel size imaging parameters and analysis methods are
explained elsewhere.
Furthermore, we would like to point out that the fast dynamic (hybrid)
GE-SE sequence can also produce CBV and CBF maps, assuming that the temporal
resolution remains sufficient.
Therefore, this technique can easily replace DSC-MRI.Up to this point, human vessel size imaging research was mainly performed in
patients with brain tumors, where two studies have demonstrated that the VSI of
tumor tissue highly correlated with the true vessel radius, obtained by
histopathology.[108,109] Vessel size imaging has
also recently been performed in patients with subcortical vascular dementia.
In the white matter of these patients, a higher mVD and VSI was found
compared to healthy controls, probably due to dilatation of small vessels and/or
a relatively fast decreasing number of small vessels in dementia. Taken
together, vessel size imaging seems to be a promising technique to reveal
information about the microvascular architecture in-vivo, although it has not
yet been investigated extensively in diseases associated with rarefaction.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
The integrity of the cerebral microvascular walls can be measured with dynamic
contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. This technique acquires dynamic T1-weighted images
before, during and after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration. The
gadolinium molecules lower the longitudinal relaxation time (T1), and therefore
enhance the T1-weighted signal.When the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is disrupted, contrast agent particles are no
longer fully restricted to the vascular compartment and can leak into the
extravascular extracellular space of the brain tissue (Figure 6). Retention of contrast agent
in brain tissue can be detected by converting signal enhancement curves to
concentration curves over time in both tissue and blood. Quantification of the
BBB leakage is then obtained by a pharmacokinetic model.
Recommendations for DCE MRI acquisition parameters and analysis for
subtle BBB impairment (e.g. in cSVD and AD), which differ from those used for
high BBB leakage rates (e.g. in high-grade tumors and stroke lesions), were
given elsewhere.
For subtle BBB leakage, the simple pharmacokinetic graphical Patlak
method is recommended, which neglects the reflux of contrast agent. The main
output measure is the BBB leakage rate K, which
is the product of the vessel surface area (S) and the permeability (P).
An additional output measure of this model is the blood volume fraction
(v).
Figure 6.
Principle of assessing the BBB leakage. The contrast agent remains
intravascular when the BBB is intact, whereas the contrast agent leaks
into the extracellular extravascular space when the BBB is disrupted.
The contrast agent concentration in tissue decreases slower in case of
impaired BBB due to the retention of contrast agent in tissue.
Image was created by use of biorender.
BBB: blood-brain barrier; CA: contrast agent.
Principle of assessing the BBB leakage. The contrast agent remains
intravascular when the BBB is intact, whereas the contrast agent leaks
into the extracellular extravascular space when the BBB is disrupted.
The contrast agent concentration in tissue decreases slower in case of
impaired BBB due to the retention of contrast agent in tissue.
Image was created by use of biorender.BBB: blood-brain barrier; CA: contrast agent.Although measuring BBB leakage with DCE MRI is promising, it has some limitations
that impede the use of this technique in routine clinical practice. The main
limitations are the significant image noise influencing the tissue concentration
curves and consequently K, and the long
scanning time (>15 minutes) to allow the contrast agent particles to
extravasate from the blood into the tissue.DCE-MRI has previously revealed an increased BBB leakage rate in cSVD [114,115] and
early AD.
In cSVD, it has been demonstrated that a higher BBB leakage rate
(measured with DCE-MRI) is correlated with decreased perfusion (measured with DSC-MRI),
and with decreased cognitive performance.
The BBB was also found to be increasingly impaired with (normal) aging.
Arterial spin labeling
Arterial spin labeling (ASL) can measure cerebral blood flow (CBF) by using
inflowing water as an endogenous tracer. This technique inverts the
magnetization of the blood water spins in the feeding arteries, thereby labeling
the blood before it enters the brain. The brain tissue is imaged after a delay
time, which allows the labeled spins to travel from the arterial compartment to
the tissue capillary bed. For each labeled image, a corresponding control image
is acquired. After image acquisition, the difference is calculated between the
non-labeled and the labeled signal, which is proportional to the CBF.Although several labeling and acquisition approaches exist, pseudo-continuous ASL
(pCASL) is most commonly used in clinical research applications.
In pCASL, a train of short RF pulses is applied to invert the spins
flowing through a labeling plane that is positioned orthogonally to the artery
(Figure 7). The
length of this RF pulse train is called the labeling duration. Another important
acquisition parameter in ASL imaging is the post-labeling delay (PLD), which is
defined as the time between the end of the labeling period and the start of the
tissue imaging. Since the labeled (i.e. inverted) blood water spins relax back
to their equilibrium state, the labeled spins ‘lose’ their labels when more time
has passed after the labelling period, and thus no perfusion signal is captured
when the PLD is too long. However, when the PLD is too short, the flowing
labeled spins have not yet entered the tissue of interest, so the optimal choice
depends on the arterial transit time (ATT). For example, a longer ATT is
expected for older adults (>70 years) and/or persons with tortuous vessels,
which explains that the recommended PLD is longer for older than for younger adults.
Thus, a correct PLD ensures that the flow signal is measured from the
capillaries and not from the afferent and/or efferent blood vessels, but in
practice the capillary flow cannot entirely be distinguished from the arteriolar
flow.
Figure 7.
Examples of ASL planning and CBF maps for healthy subject (upper row) and
a patient with vascular cognitive impairment (bottom row). The
acquisition volume (green) captures the brain tissue (a) (e), and the
labeling slice (purple) is placed orthogonally to the arteries (b) (f).
The importance of visualizing the arteries for ASL planning is shown in
(f), where the artery map is required to avoid the tortuous part of the
artery in the labeling plane. The CBF maps for a healthy subject are
shown in (c) and (d), where the labeled blood water spins have reached
the brain tissue. The CBF maps for a patient with vascular cognitive
impairment (lower arterial blood velocity) are shown in (g) and (h),
where the labeled blood water spins are still located in the arteries
(white arrow indicate the high perfusion signal from arteries).
Examples of ASL planning and CBF maps for healthy subject (upper row) and
a patient with vascular cognitive impairment (bottom row). The
acquisition volume (green) captures the brain tissue (a) (e), and the
labeling slice (purple) is placed orthogonally to the arteries (b) (f).
The importance of visualizing the arteries for ASL planning is shown in
(f), where the artery map is required to avoid the tortuous part of the
artery in the labeling plane. The CBF maps for a healthy subject are
shown in (c) and (d), where the labeled blood water spins have reached
the brain tissue. The CBF maps for a patient with vascular cognitive
impairment (lower arterial blood velocity) are shown in (g) and (h),
where the labeled blood water spins are still located in the arteries
(white arrow indicate the high perfusion signal from arteries).CBF: cerebral blood flow; A: anterior; P: posterior; R: right, L: left;
ASL: arterial spin labeling.ASL is an acknowledged MRI technique to measure CBF quantitatively in the grey
matter. Consensus recommendations have been given for its clinical implementation.
However, ASL has a lower contrast effect compared to DSC-MRI. The
contrast effect of ASL is particularly low in white matter, since white matter
has a longer ATT and lower perfusion compared to grey matter.
Therefore, performing ASL at a magnetic field of 3 T or higher is
strongly preferred, as this increases the contrast-to-noise ratio.
Although ASL is ready for clinical use, new variants are still emerging
to address the remaining challenges
and to provide additional physiological measures, such as the rate of
water exchange across the BBB.Since ASL is non-invasive and can easily be repeated, this technique is well
suited to measure another relevant biomarker reflecting the microvascular
condition: cerebrovascular reserve (CVR). To determine CVR, CBF is measured in
both resting state and maximum flow state (i.e. during a vasodilator challenge).
This maximum flow state can be created physiologically (breath hold or CO2
inhalation) or pharmaceutically (acetazolamide administration). The CVR
describes to what extent the CBF is able to increase during the vasodilator
challenge compared to baseline. In patients with structural rarefaction, most
residual capillaries are already perfused and dilated at rest, so they lack the
ability to further increase their CBF in critical situations.
Note that CVR can also be measured using other MRI techniques, for
instance based on the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) effect, which were
reviewed elsewehere.Previous ASL studies in healthy aging and AD have critically been reviewed,
whereby it was concluded that ASL is a promising tool to measure hypoperfusion
in AD, contributing to early AD diagnosis.
The hypoperfusion patterns found with ASL resembled fluorodeoxyglucose
positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) derived hypometabolism patterns in AD and
mild cognitive impairment.
Furthermore, ASL demonstrated a decreased CBF in cSVD within WMHs,
and perilesional zones,
as well as in healthy aging.
Nevertheless, CBF measurements by ASL should be interpreted with caution
in these populations, since the measured hypoperfusion could have partially been
caused by a longer ATT and thus might not entirely reflect functional rarefaction.
One advanced ASL technique worth considering in cerebrovascular diseases
is multi-delay ASL, which corrects the CBF for ATT at the cost of longer imaging
duration or fewer label-control pairs (reducing the contrast effect) and more
complex imaging processing.
When multi-delay ASL is not feasible in populations with expected
prolonged ATT, an ASL with long PLD is advised, including those where
rarefaction is likely expressing.
Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging is a diffusion weighted imaging
technique that can provide information about microvascular perfusion, in
addition to the parenchymal diffusivity.
When capillaries are assumed to follow a random pattern of directions,
the flow of blood molecules through the capillary network can be referred to as
pseudo-diffusion. The microvascular pseudo-diffusion is typically ten times
higher than the parenchymal diffusivity.
IVIM parameters can be obtained by fitting a biexponential model,
resulting in the parenchymal diffusion (
), the microvascular pseudodiffusion (
*), and the blood volume perfusion fraction (
). The product of the blood volume perfusion fraction and
pseudodiffusion (fD*) is assumed to represent a proxy of the
microvascular blood flow, though physical units differ.
Examples of
- and
-maps for a patient with cSVD are visualized in Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Example of IVIM parameter maps in cSVD: Fluid Attenuated Inversion
Recovery (a), blood volume perfusion fraction (b) and parenchymal
diffusion (c). The arrows indicate that even for normal-appearing white
matter differences in f and D were visible.
Source: reproduced with permission form publisher (2017).
Example of IVIM parameter maps in cSVD: Fluid Attenuated Inversion
Recovery (a), blood volume perfusion fraction (b) and parenchymal
diffusion (c). The arrows indicate that even for normal-appearing white
matter differences in f and D were visible.Source: reproduced with permission form publisher (2017).f: blood volume perfusion fraction; D: parenchymal
diffusion; IVIM: intravoxel incoherent motion imaging; cSVD: cerebral
small vessel disease.The ability of IVIM to measure perfusion was validated by a study scanning
healthy volunteers during normal breathing as well as hyperventilation.
The IVIM perfusion measures (
and fD*) were reduced in the hyperventilation
condition, which was in agreement with hypotheses and with the measured ASL perfusion.Measuring acute hypoperfusion with IVIM was shown to be feasible in stroke
patients, whereas the interpretation of the IVIM perfusion measurement in
patient groups with chronic hypoperfusion is not straightforward.
IVIM perfusion has previously been measured in cSVD,
type 2 diabetes,
AD [138,139] and neurologically normal aging subjects.
These studies anticipated to find a reduced blood flow volume and/or
hypoperfusion (lower
and fD*), yet instead they found an increase
in
and fD* in the diseased/older group compared
to the control group. These studies reasoned that the small blood vessels were
dilated or that
* and
do not merely represent the microvascular component.
Other factors may increase the attenuation of the microvascular component
in IVIM and thus cause
* and
to be higher, e.g. movement of interstitial fluid,[140,142] BBB
leakage,[137,143] and vessel tortuosity.
Since rarefaction is often linked with one or more of these vascular
alterations, the IVIM perfusion measures (f,
D* and fD*) are rather indicative of
microvascular integrity than mere CBF.
Other techniques to measure microvascular rarefaction
In this review we focused on MRI for the assessment of microvascular rarefaction
since we believe it is the most feasible and versatile non-invasive imaging method
to measure cerebral microvascular rarefaction in human in vivo. Other imaging
modalities that can be used to measure CBF in human include positron emission
tomography (PET), single photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT), and computed
tomography (CT).
PET can also be used to measure subtle BBB leakage.
Although these other techniques can have specific advantages, they are less
widely applied than MRI, as MRI provides detailed information on the brain’s anatomy
and tissue lesions in the same examination session, can be more easily repeated over
time, and involves no ionizing radiation exposure or administration of iodinated
contrast material. Since microvascular rarefaction is assumed to be a systemic
process, measures of rarefaction in other, more easily accessible, organs could
serve as a surrogate marker for cerebral microvascular rarefaction. Especially
measures of microvascular density in the retina, obtained by optical coherence
tomography angiography, seem to be suited as surrogate marker due to the anatomical
and functional similarity of the cerebral and retinal vessels.
Other commonly used techniques to measure microvascular rarefaction include
sublingual and skin intravital video-microscopy, and nailfold capillary microscopy.
An extensive description of these non-MRI techniques is beyond the scope of this
review.
Discussion and future directions
Considering the growing ageing population, microvascular related brain disorders such
as AD and VCI will become an even bigger worldwide health issue in the future then
they already are today. Lack of early diagnosis and effective treatments are major
problems. To enable early diagnosis and to find targets for new therapies, a better
understanding of the underlying pathophysiological pathways leading to these
microvascular brain disorders is needed.In this review we have pointed out four main pathophysiological pathways involved in
microvascular rarefaction (impaired angiogenesis and active capillary regression,
endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis, pericyte loss, and loss of shear stress), and
their possible interplay. Although the pathophysiological pathways underlying
microvascular rarefaction in the brain are becoming clearer, there are still a
number of knowledge gaps to be filled in. Currently, most research into the
pathophysiology of microvascular rarefaction has been conducted in animal models,
whereas studies in humans are needed to confirm that findings in animals relate to
these in human. More research investigating the different pathophysiological
processes simultaneously is needed to learn more about the sequence and the relative
importance of these processes. Furthermore, little is known about the relation of
microvascular rarefaction with other processes known to play a role in microvascular
related brain disorders (e.g. neuro-inflammation, BBB disruption).Existing MRI techniques can increase the knowledge about the role of microvascular
rarefaction and its underlying pathophysiological pathways in microvascular brain
disorders. The various techniques described in this review cannot depict
microvessels in a morphological way, but can measure various functional aspects of
microvascular rarefaction. Table 2 provides an overview of the main pathophysiological processes
and the resulting expected changes in physiological MRI measures during the
timelapse of rarefaction. Endothelial dysfunction causing a reduced arteriolar
vasodilator capacity and enhanced pericyte contraction, both directly lead to a
reversible reduction in blood flow and volume (i.e. functional rarefaction), whereas
impaired angiogenesis and capillary regression, endothelial apoptosis and pericyte
loss lead to an actual reduction in capillaries and thus an irreversible reduction
in blood flow and volume. These reductions in blood flow and volume should be
measurable with DSC MRI, ASL and IVIM. Vessel size imaging may be able to measure
reduced mean vessel density. The CTTH determined with DSC MRI, can reflect the
inhomogeneous flow patterns within the capillary network caused by pericyte loss.
BBB leakage is not directly related to rarefaction itself, however the associated
underlying pathophysiological processes influence the leakage measure
K obtained with DCE-MRI. The interpretation
of K (P · S) is not straightforward in the context
of microvascular rarefaction. On one hand, a reduced capillary density leads to a
reduced total vessel surface area S, contributing to a decreased leakage
K. On the other hand, pericyte loss and
endothelial apoptosis result in a leaky vessel wall, causing an increase in
permeability P, resulting in an increased K.
Previous studies have shown increased K in diseases
associated with rarefaction,[114-116] suggesting that the
increase in P dominates. The detectable effects of vessel diameter changes in
rarefaction by vessel size imaging are also debatable. The effects of endothelial
dysfunction (i.e. reduced arteriolar vasodilator capacity) and enhanced pericyte
contraction would lead to a decreased vessel radius. Meanwhile, there are other
effects causing an enlarged mean vessel radius, e.g. vessel dilation as a
compensatory mechanism for the reduced CBF in structural rarefaction or as a result
of pericyte loss, and the occlusion or collapse of the smallest capillaries.
Which techniques serve best to measure microvascular rarefaction at what
stage of the pathological cascade in microvascular brain disorders is likely a
complex puzzle to be solved.In the context of microvascular brain disorders, the physiological MRI techniques
described are mainly used in clinical research settings. These techniques can be
classified into exogenous and endogenous contrast agent based techniques. In
general, the strength of exogenous contrast agent based MRI techniques (i.e. DSC
MRI, vessel size imaging and DCE MRI) is the strong contrast effect.
However, contrast agents have a small risk to induce contrast nephropathy in
patients with pre-existing renal impairment. The endogenous contrast agent based MRI
techniques (i.e. ASL and IVIM) can be used as an alternative in people with
contraindications for contrast agent, and are preferable when multiple measurements
over time are required. The endogenous techniques are still emerging, and a detailed
understanding of these techniques is needed for clear interpretation of the
perfusion MRI measures in microvascular brain disorders. Researchers should be aware
of the confounding factors, i.e. the influence of the arterial transit time on ASL
perfusion signal and the non-perfusion factors that contribute to the IVIM perfusion
signal.Furthermore, the image acquisition and analysis protocols for advanced MRI techniques
vary widely, which hampers progression in understanding the underlying
pathophysiological pathways in microvascular rarefaction and its contribution to the
clinical features of microvascular brain disorders such as AD and cSVD. To enable
comparing studies over various sites, MRI protocols for image acquisition and image
analysis need to be standardized.More studies investigating these MRI techniques in human microvascular brain
disorders are essential to establish test-retest repeatability and for validation of
sensitivity to the subtle changes which can be found in these disorders. Ideally,
longitudinal studies are needed to assess true rarefaction, i.e. temporal changes in
microvascular density throughout disease progression and during healthy aging.
Considering younger subjects are more likely to show significant differences in
vessel density due to pathologies such as AD and cSVD in comparison with aged
matched controls, it might be valuable to prevent oversampling of oldest-old
subjects in future studies.
Furthermore, there remains a need for validation of these MRI techniques in
combined radiological-histological studies to confirm that the obtained MRI measures
correlate with actual structural microvascular rarefaction. The international
CRUCIAL consortium
aims to identify cerebral microvascular rarefaction using advanced MRI
techniques in a population of VCI patients and healthy aged controls, and will
validate these MRI techniques by scanning and performing histologic examination on
rat brains.We reviewed the evidence for microvascular rarefaction as an early pathophysiological
process in a number of microvascular brain disorders and normal ageing, and the
value of advanced MRI techniques addressing different properties of the
microvasculature for its assessment. Although these MRI techniques are promising to
contribute to early diagnostic information and to be used for monitoring treatment
response in microvascular brain disorders in the future, these techniques are still
emerging and do not provide disease specific information. More clinical studies,
preferably longitudinal, are needed in large patient populations with various brain
disorders as well as in aging.
Authors: K Meguro; J Hatazawa; T Yamaguchi; M Itoh; T Matsuzawa; S Ono; H Miyazawa; T Hishinuma; K Yanai; Y Sekita Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1990-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Junie P Warrington; Anna Csiszar; Daniel A Johnson; Terence S Herman; Salahuddin Ahmad; Yong Woo Lee; William E Sonntag Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Elles P Elschot; Walter H Backes; Alida A Postma; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Julie Staals; Rob P W Rouhl; Jacobus F A Jansen Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Philip B Gorelick; Angelo Scuteri; Sandra E Black; Charles Decarli; Steven M Greenberg; Costantino Iadecola; Lenore J Launer; Stephane Laurent; Oscar L Lopez; David Nyenhuis; Ronald C Petersen; Julie A Schneider; Christophe Tzourio; Donna K Arnett; David A Bennett; Helena C Chui; Randall T Higashida; Ruth Lindquist; Peter M Nilsson; Gustavo C Roman; Frank W Sellke; Sudha Seshadri Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Casey Vieni; Benjamin Ades-Aron; Bettina Conti; Eric E Sigmund; Peter Riviello; Timothy M Shepherd; Yvonne W Lui; Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Joanna M Wardlaw; Eric E Smith; Geert J Biessels; Charlotte Cordonnier; Franz Fazekas; Richard Frayne; Richard I Lindley; John T O'Brien; Frederik Barkhof; Oscar R Benavente; Sandra E Black; Carol Brayne; Monique Breteler; Hugues Chabriat; Charles Decarli; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Fergus Doubal; Marco Duering; Nick C Fox; Steven Greenberg; Vladimir Hachinski; Ingo Kilimann; Vincent Mok; Robert van Oostenbrugge; Leonardo Pantoni; Oliver Speck; Blossom C M Stephan; Stefan Teipel; Anand Viswanathan; David Werring; Christopher Chen; Colin Smith; Mark van Buchem; Bo Norrving; Philip B Gorelick; Martin Dichgans Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 44.182