Literature DB >> 3507702

Comparison of solvent-inaccessible cores of homologous proteins: definitions useful for protein modelling.

T J Hubbard1, T L Blundell.   

Abstract

The three-dimensional structures of 41 homologous proteins (belonging to eight families) were compared by pairwise superposition. A subset of 'core' residues was defined as those whose side chains have less than 7% of their surface exposed to solvent. This subset has significantly higher sequence identity and lower root mean square (RMS) alpha carbon separation than for all topologically equivalent residues in the structure, when members of a protein family are superposed. For such superpositions the relationship between RMS distance and percentage sequence identity of this subset of residues is similar to that for all equivalent residues, although some variation is observed between families of proteins which are predominantly beta sheet and those which are mainly alpha helix. The definition of a structurally more conserved core may be useful in model building proteins from an homologous family. The RMS differences of coordinates of structures of proteins with identical sequences are found to be related to the resolutions of the structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3507702     DOI: 10.1093/protein/1.3.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng        ISSN: 0269-2139


  47 in total

1.  Substitution rates in alpha-helical transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  T J Stevens; I T Arkin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A comparison of position-specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Discrete restraint-based protein modeling and the Calpha-trace problem.

Authors:  Mark A DePristo; Paul I W De Bakker; Reshma P Shetty; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Analysis of protein homology by assessing the (dis)similarity in protein loop regions.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko; Thomas Madej
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-15

5.  GTPase domains of ras p21 oncogene protein and elongation factor Tu: analysis of three-dimensional structures, sequence families, and functional sites.

Authors:  A Valencia; M Kjeldgaard; E F Pai; C Sander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Molecular anatomy: phyletic relationships derived from three-dimensional structures of proteins.

Authors:  M S Johnson; M J Sutcliffe; T L Blundell
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Distinct protein interfaces in transmembrane domains suggest an in vivo folding model.

Authors:  Timothy J Stevens; Kenji Mizuguchi; Isaiah T Arkin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Analysis on sliding helices and strands in protein structural comparisons: a case study with protein kinases.

Authors:  V S Gowri; K Anamika; S Gore; N Srinivasan
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Comparison of sequence-based and structure-based phylogenetic trees of homologous proteins: Inferences on protein evolution.

Authors:  S Balaji; N Srinivasan
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Evolutionary constraints on structural similarity in orthologs and paralogs.

Authors:  Mark E Peterson; Feng Chen; Jeffery G Saven; David S Roos; Patricia C Babbitt; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.