Literature DB >> 35076779

Is the vertex a good control stimulation site? Theta burst stimulation in healthy controls.

Dominik Pizem1,2, Lubomira Novakova3, Martin Gajdos2, Irena Rektorova2,4.   

Abstract

The vertex has been used as a suitable control stimulation site in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. The objectives of this study are (1) to assess cognitive performance (CP) after theta burst stimulation (TBS); (2) to evaluate whether clinically relevant cortical areas might be reached by vertex stimulation and how that might influence CP. Twenty young healthy subjects performed a cognitive task prior to and immediately after intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS) of two active cortical stimulation sites and the vertex. We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the pre- and post-stimulation reaction times (RTs) and a mixed ANOVA analysis to evaluate the effect of the stimulation on changes in RTs. A three-dimensional finite-element model (FEM) was used to calculate the vertex TBS-induced electrical field (E-field) in the adjacent regions of interest (ROIs). Correlation analyses were performed between E-fields in the ROIs and cognitive outcomes. We found a significant effect only of the stimulation time factor (F (1,12) = 65.37, p < 0.001) on RT shortening, with no superiority of the active site stimulation compared to the vertex stimulation. In 73.5% of vertex TBS sessions, a significant E-field was induced in at least one ROI. We found a negative association between the magnitude of the iTBS-induced E-fields and RT changes (R = - 0.54, p = 0.04). TBS protocols may lead to changes in CP when applied over the craniometrically targeted vertex. We therefore suggest not using a conventional approach as a vertex targeting method.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive; Control condition; SimNIBS; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Vertex stimulation; rTMS

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35076779     DOI: 10.1007/s00702-022-02466-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)        ISSN: 0300-9564            Impact factor:   3.850


  85 in total

Review 1.  Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives.

Authors:  Til Ole Bergmann; Anke Karabanov; Gesa Hartwigsen; Axel Thielscher; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities.

Authors:  Junichi Chikazoe; Seiki Konishi; Tomoki Asari; Koji Jimura; Yasushi Miyashita
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  General indices to characterize the electrical response of the cerebral cortex to TMS.

Authors:  Adenauer G Casali; Silvia Casarotto; Mario Rosanova; Maurizio Mariotti; Marcello Massimini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Stuttering as a matter of delay in neural activation: A combined TMS/EEG study.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Busan; Giovanni Del Ben; Lucia Roberta Russo; Simona Bernardini; Giulia Natarelli; Giorgio Arcara; Paolo Manganotti; Piero Paolo Battaglini
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Effective connectivity between human supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex: a paired-coil TMS study.

Authors:  Noritoshi Arai; Ming-Kuei Lu; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Functional heterogeneity of the supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Gyung Ho Chung; Young Min Han; Su Hyun Jeong; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Volume of motor area predicts motor impulsivity.

Authors:  Hui Ai; Yuanyuan Xin; Yue-Jia Luo; Ruolei Gu; Pengfei Xu
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Distinct Pattern of Gray Matter Atrophy in Mild Alzheimer's Disease Impacts on Cognitive Outcomes of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Lubomira Anderkova; Ilona Eliasova; Radek Marecek; Eva Janousova; Irena Rektorova
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.472

9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the supplementary motor area modulates the preparatory activation level in the human motor system.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Jeremy S Eagles; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Cerebellar theta burst stimulation modulates the neural activity of interconnected parietal and motor areas.

Authors:  Elias Paolo Casula; Maria Concetta Pellicciari; Viviana Ponzo; Mario Stampanoni Bassi; Domenica Veniero; Carlo Caltagirone; Giacomo Koch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.