Literature DB >> 35074471

Value of liver biopsy in the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury.

Jawad Ahmad1, Huiman X Barnhart2, Maurizio Bonacini3, Marwan Ghabril4, Paul H Hayashi5, Joseph A Odin6, Don C Rockey7, Simona Rossi8, Jose Serrano9, Hans L Tillmann10, David E Kleiner11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The utility of liver biopsy in diagnosing or staging idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether liver histology impacted causality assessment in suspected DILI using a novel simulation model.
METHODS: Fifty patients enrolled in the DILI Network (DILIN) who had liver biopsies performed within 60 days of DILI onset were randomly selected. All had standard DILIN consensus causality scoring using a 5-point scale (1=definite, 2=highly likely, 3=probable, 4=possible, 5=unlikely) based on 6-month post-injury data. Three experienced hepatologists independently performed a causality assessment using redacted case records, with the biopsy and selected post-biopsy laboratory data removed. The 3 hepatologists also reviewed the liver histology with a hepatopathologist and then repeated causality assessment for each case.
RESULTS: Of the 50 cases, there were 42 high causality DILI cases (1, 2 or 3) and 8 low causality cases (4 and 5). The hepatologists judged that liver biopsy was indicated in 62% of patients; after histology review, biopsy was judged to have been helpful in 70% of patients. Histology review changed the causality score in 68% of patients, with an increase in DILI likelihood in 48% and a decrease in 20%. Biopsy results changed diagnostic certainty from less certain (3 or 4) to highly certain (1, 2 or 5) in 38% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Liver histologic findings may help clarify the diagnosis of DILI. Histology appears to be particularly helpful in cholestatic or equivocal cases of DILI (possible or probable), shifting assessment toward a greater or lower certainty of a DILI diagnosis. LAY
SUMMARY: The utility of liver biopsy in diagnosing or staging idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is unclear. Herein, we show that, in patients with suspected DILI, a liver biopsy can help physicians diagnose DILI or other causes of liver injury with more certainty.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histology; accuracy; assessment; causality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35074471      PMCID: PMC9018618          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  9 in total

1.  The use of liver biopsy evaluation in discrimination of idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis versus drug-induced liver injury.

Authors:  Ayako Suzuki; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Rosa Miquel; Thomas C Smyrk; Raul J Andrade; M Isabel Lucena; Agustin Castiella; Keith Lindor; Einar Björnsson
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Clinical presentations and outcomes of bile duct loss caused by drugs and herbal and dietary supplements.

Authors:  Herbert L Bonkovsky; David E Kleiner; Jiezhun Gu; Joseph A Odin; Mark W Russo; Victor M Navarro; Robert J Fontana; Marwan S Ghabril; Huiman Barnhart; Jay H Hoofnagle
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs--II. An original model for validation of drug causality assessment methods: case reports with positive rechallenge.

Authors:  C Benichou; G Danan; A Flahault
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Identification and Characterization of Cefazolin-Induced Liver Injury.

Authors:  Saleh A Alqahtani; David E Kleiner; Marwan Ghabril; Jiezhun Gu; Jay H Hoofnagle; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment method.

Authors:  Don C Rockey; Leonard B Seeff; James Rochon; James Freston; Naga Chalasani; Maurizio Bonacini; Robert J Fontana; Paul H Hayashi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Features and Outcomes of 899 Patients With Drug-Induced Liver Injury: The DILIN Prospective Study.

Authors:  Naga Chalasani; Herbert L Bonkovsky; Robert Fontana; William Lee; Andrew Stolz; Jayant Talwalkar; K Rajendar Reddy; Paul B Watkins; Victor Navarro; Huiman Barnhart; Jiezhun Gu; Jose Serrano
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study: rationale, design and conduct.

Authors:  Robert J Fontana; Paul B Watkins; Herbert L Bonkovsky; Naga Chalasani; Timothy Davern; Jose Serrano; James Rochon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Persistent liver biochemistry abnormalities are more common in older patients and those with cholestatic drug induced liver injury.

Authors:  Robert J Fontana; Paul H Hayashi; Huiman Barnhart; David E Kleiner; K Rajender Reddy; Naga Chalasani; William M Lee; Andrew Stolz; Thomas Phillips; Jose Serrano; Paul B Watkins
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Hepatic histological findings in suspected drug-induced liver injury: systematic evaluation and clinical associations.

Authors:  David E Kleiner; Naga P Chalasani; William M Lee; Robert J Fontana; Herbert L Bonkovsky; Paul B Watkins; Paul H Hayashi; Timothy J Davern; Victor Navarro; Rajender Reddy; Jayant A Talwalkar; Andrew Stolz; Jiezhun Gu; Huiman Barnhart; Jay H Hoofnagle
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 17.425

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A revised electronic version of RUCAM for the diagnosis of DILI.

Authors:  Paul H Hayashi; M Isabel Lucena; Robert J Fontana; Einar S Bjornsson; Guruprasad P Aithal; Huiman Barnhart; Andres Gonzalez-Jimenez; Qinghong Yang; Jiezhun Gu; Raul J Andrade; Jay H Hoofnagle
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 17.298

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.