UNLABELLED: Distinguishing drug-induced liver injury (DILI) from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) can be challenging. We performed a standardized histologic evaluation to explore potential hallmarks to differentiate AIH versus DILI. Biopsies from patients with clinically well-characterized DILI [n = 35, including 19 hepatocellular injury (HC) and 16 cholestatic/mixed injury (CS)] and AIH (n = 28) were evaluated for Ishak scores, prominent inflammatory cell types in portal and intra-acinar areas, the presence or absence of emperipolesis, rosette formation, and cholestasis in a blinded fashion by four experienced hepatopathologists. Histologic diagnosis was concordant with clinical diagnosis in 65% of cases; but agreement on final diagnosis among the four pathologists was complete in only 46% of cases. Interface hepatitis, focal necrosis, and portal inflammation were present in all evaluated cases, but were more severe in AIH (P < 0.05) than DILI (HC). Portal and intra-acinar plasma cells, rosette formation, and emperiopolesis were features that favored AIH (P < 0.02). A model combining portal inflammation, portal plasma cells, intra-acinar lymphocytes and eosinophils, rosette formation, and canalicular cholestasis yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.90 in predicting DILI (HC) versus AIH. All Ishak inflammation scores were more severe in AIH than DILI (CS) (P ≤ 0.05). The four AIH-favoring features listed above were consistently more prevalent in AIH, whereas portal neutrophils and intracellular (hepatocellular) cholestasis were more prevalent in DILI (CS) (P < 0.02). The combination of portal inflammation, fibrosis, portal neutrophils and plasma cells, and intracellular (hepatocellular) cholestasis yielded an AUC of 0.91 in predicting DILI (CS) versus AIH. CONCLUSION: Although an overlap of histologic findings exists for AIH and DILI, sufficient differences exist so that pathologists can use the pattern of injury to suggest the correct diagnosis.
UNLABELLED: Distinguishing drug-induced liver injury (DILI) from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) can be challenging. We performed a standardized histologic evaluation to explore potential hallmarks to differentiate AIH versus DILI. Biopsies from patients with clinically well-characterized DILI [n = 35, including 19 hepatocellular injury (HC) and 16 cholestatic/mixed injury (CS)] and AIH (n = 28) were evaluated for Ishak scores, prominent inflammatory cell types in portal and intra-acinar areas, the presence or absence of emperipolesis, rosette formation, and cholestasis in a blinded fashion by four experienced hepatopathologists. Histologic diagnosis was concordant with clinical diagnosis in 65% of cases; but agreement on final diagnosis among the four pathologists was complete in only 46% of cases. Interface hepatitis, focal necrosis, and portal inflammation were present in all evaluated cases, but were more severe in AIH (P < 0.05) than DILI (HC). Portal and intra-acinar plasma cells, rosette formation, and emperiopolesis were features that favored AIH (P < 0.02). A model combining portal inflammation, portal plasma cells, intra-acinar lymphocytes and eosinophils, rosette formation, and canalicular cholestasis yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.90 in predicting DILI (HC) versus AIH. All Ishak inflammation scores were more severe in AIH than DILI (CS) (P ≤ 0.05). The four AIH-favoring features listed above were consistently more prevalent in AIH, whereas portal neutrophils and intracellular (hepatocellular) cholestasis were more prevalent in DILI (CS) (P < 0.02). The combination of portal inflammation, fibrosis, portal neutrophils and plasma cells, and intracellular (hepatocellular) cholestasis yielded an AUC of 0.91 in predicting DILI (CS) versus AIH. CONCLUSION: Although an overlap of histologic findings exists for AIH and DILI, sufficient differences exist so that pathologists can use the pattern of injury to suggest the correct diagnosis.
Authors: R D Soloway; W H Summerskill; A H Baggenstoss; M G Geall; G L Gitnićk; I R Elveback; L J Schoenfield Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1972-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: F Alvarez; P A Berg; F B Bianchi; L Bianchi; A K Burroughs; E L Cancado; R W Chapman; W G Cooksley; A J Czaja; V J Desmet; P T Donaldson; A L Eddleston; L Fainboim; J Heathcote; J C Homberg; J H Hoofnagle; S Kakumu; E L Krawitt; I R Mackay; R N MacSween; W C Maddrey; M P Manns; I G McFarlane; K H Meyer zum Büschenfelde; M Zeniya Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: K Ishak; A Baptista; L Bianchi; F Callea; J De Groote; F Gudat; H Denk; V Desmet; G Korb; R N MacSween Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Elke M Hennes; Mikio Zeniya; Albert J Czaja; Albert Parés; George N Dalekos; Edward L Krawitt; Paulo L Bittencourt; Gilda Porta; Kirsten M Boberg; Harald Hofer; Francesco B Bianchi; Minoru Shibata; Christoph Schramm; Barbara Eisenmann de Torres; Peter R Galle; Ian McFarlane; Hans-Peter Dienes; Ansgar W Lohse Journal: Hepatology Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Carmen Ferrajolo; Katia M C Verhamme; Gianluca Trifirò; Geert W 't Jong; Carlo Giaquinto; Gino Picelli; Alessandro Oteri; Sandra de Bie; Vera E Valkhoff; Martijn J Schuemie; Giampiero Mazzaglia; Claudio Cricelli; Francesco Rossi; Annalisa Capuano; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.606