| Literature DB >> 35072106 |
Jing Xiao1, Jinqiu Wang1, Renyou Gan2, Di Wu1, Yisha Xu1, Lianxin Peng1, Fang Geng1.
Abstract
Post-translational modification structure of food's proteins might be changed during processing, thereby affecting the nutritional characteristics of the food product. In this study, differences in protein N-glycosylation patterns between milk and yogurt were quantitatively compared based on glycopeptide enrichment, liquid chromatography separation, and tandem mass spectrometry analysis. A total of 181 N-glycosites were identified, among which 142 were quantified in milk and yogurt. Significant alterations in the abundance of 13 of these N-glycosites were evident after the fermentation of milk into yogurt. Overall, the N-glycosylation status of the majority of milk proteins remained relatively unchanged in yogurt, suggesting that their conformations, activities, and functions were maintained despite the fermentation process. Among the main milk proteins, N241 of cathepsin D and N358 of lactoperoxidase were markedly reduced after undergoing lactic acid fermentation to produce yogurt. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of current and previously reported N-glycoproteomic data revealed heterogeneity in the N-glycosylation of milk proteins. To sum up, a quantitative comparison of the N-glycoproteomes of milk and yogurt was presented here for the first time, providing evidence that the fermentation process of yogurt could cause changes in the N-glycosylation of certain milk proteins.Entities:
Keywords: CD, cluster of differentiation; FC, fold change; GO, Gene Ontology; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; Lactoperoxidase; Lactotransferrin; MFGM, milk fat globule membrane; Milk; N-glycoproteome; TGFB1, transforming growth factor beta-1 proprotein; Yogurt
Year: 2022 PMID: 35072106 PMCID: PMC8763629 DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.01.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Food Sci ISSN: 2665-9271
Fig. 1Characteristics of identified N-glycoproteins from bovine milk and yogurt. (A) Mass error distribution of the identified N-glycopeptides; (B) number of N-glycosylation sites per identified N-glycoprotein; (C) the sequence motifs of the identified N-glycopeptides; (D) distribution of recognized sequence motifs based on the unique sequences or MS/MS counts of the identified N-glycopeptides (X ≠ P).
Fig. 2Gene ontology (GO) classification (A) and subcellular localization (B) of the N-glycoproteins identified in bovine milk and yogurt.
Fig. 3Quantitative comparison of protein N-glycosylation between the bovine milk and yogurt samples. (A) Principal component analysis of milk (M) and yogurt (Y) N-glycoproteomes; (B) the number of differentially abundant N-glycoproteins and N-glycosites between milk and yogurt.
Fig. 4Variation in the abundances of N-glycoproteins (N-glycosites) between bovine milk (M) and yogurt (Y); Results are showing by mean ± SE, n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Fig. 5Comparisons of the N-glycosite distribution of platelet glycoprotein 4 (A) and glycoprotein 2 (B) from MFGM (Cao et al., 2019a), whey (Cao et al., 2019b), and milk (this study).