Literature DB >> 35072087

A Generative Modeling Approach to Calibrated Predictions: A Use Case on Menstrual Cycle Length Prediction.

Iñigo Urteaga1, Kathy Li1, Amanda Shea2, Virginia J Vitzthum3, Chris H Wiggins1, Noémie Elhadad4.   

Abstract

We explore how to quantify uncertainty when designing predictive models for healthcare to provide well-calibrated results. Uncertainty quantification and calibration are critical in medicine, as one must not only accommodate the variability of the underlying physiology, but adjust to the uncertain data collection and reporting process. This occurs not only on the context of electronic health records (i.e., the clinical documentation process), but on mobile health as well (i.e., user specific self-tracking patterns must be accounted for). In this work, we show that accurate uncertainty estimation is directly relevant to an important health application: the prediction of menstrual cycle length, based on self-tracked information. We take advantage of a flexible generative model that accommodates under-dispersed distributions via two degrees of freedom to fit the mean and variance of the observed cycle lengths. From a machine learning perspective, our work showcases how flexible generative models can not only provide state-of-the art predictive accuracy, but enable well-calibrated predictions. From a healthcare perspective, we demonstrate that with flexible generative models, not only can we accommodate the idiosyncrasies of mobile health data, but we can also adjust the predictive uncertainty to per-user cycle length patterns. We evaluate the proposed model in real-world cycle length data collected by one of the most popular menstrual trackers worldwide, and demonstrate how the proposed generative model provides accurate and well-calibrated cycle length predictions. Providing meaningful, less uncertain cycle length predictions is beneficial for menstrual health researchers, mobile health users and developers, as it may help design more usable mobile health solutions.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35072087      PMCID: PMC8782440     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Mach Learn Res


  22 in total

1.  A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; Daan Nieboer; Yvonne Vergouwe; Bavo De Cock; Michael J Pencina; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Calibration of clinical prediction rules does not just assess bias.

Authors:  Werner Vach
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life.

Authors:  A E Treloar; R E Boynton; B G Behn; B W Brown
Journal:  Int J Fertil       Date:  1967 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope.

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-16

5.  Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Alba; Thomas Agoritsas; Michael Walsh; Steven Hanna; Alfonso Iorio; P J Devereaux; Thomas McGinn; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  X-CAL: Explicit Calibration for Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Mark Goldstein; Xintian Han; Aahlad Puli; Adler J Perotte; Rajesh Ranganath
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2020-12

7.  Learning endometriosis phenotypes from patient-generated data.

Authors:  Iñigo Urteaga; Mollie McKillop; Noémie Elhadad
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-06-24

8.  Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.

Authors:  Alvin Rajkomar; Eyal Oren; Kai Chen; Andrew M Dai; Nissan Hajaj; Michaela Hardt; Peter J Liu; Xiaobing Liu; Jake Marcus; Mimi Sun; Patrik Sundberg; Hector Yee; Kun Zhang; Yi Zhang; Gerardo Flores; Gavin E Duggan; Jamie Irvine; Quoc Le; Kurt Litsch; Alexander Mossin; Justin Tansuwan; James Wexler; Jimbo Wilson; Dana Ludwig; Samuel L Volchenboum; Katherine Chou; Michael Pearson; Srinivasan Madabushi; Nigam H Shah; Atul J Butte; Michael D Howell; Claire Cui; Greg S Corrado; Jeffrey Dean
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2018-05-08

9.  Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools.

Authors:  Daniel A Epstein; Nicole B Lee; Jennifer H Kang; Elena Agapie; Jessica Schroeder; Laura R Pina; James Fogarty; Julie A Kientz; Sean A Munson
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2017-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.