Tumorigenesis is associated with metabolic abnormalities and genomic instability. Microsatellite mutations, including microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH), are associated with the functional impairment of some tumor-related genes. To investigate the role of MSI and LOH in sporadic breast tumors in canines, 22 tumors DNA samples and their adjacent normal tissues were evaluated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver staining for 58 microsatellites. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, promoter methylation analysis and immunohistochemical staining were used to quantify gene expression. The results revealed that a total of 14 tumors (6 benign tumors and 8 breast cancers) exhibited instability as MSI-Low tumors. Most of the microsatellite loci possessed a single occurrence of mutations. The maximum number of MSI mutations on loci was observed in tumors with a lower degree of differentiation. Among the unstable markers, FH2060 (4/22), ABCC9tetra (4/22) and SCN11A (6/22) were high-frequency mutation sites, whereas FH2060 was a high-frequency LOH site (4/22). The ABCC9tetra locus was mutated only in cancerous tissue, although it was excluded by transcription. The corresponding genes and proteins were significantly downregulated in malignant tissues, particularly in tumors with MSI. Furthermore, the promoter methylation results of the adenosine triphosphate binding cassette subfamily C member 9 (ABCC9) showed that there was a high level of methylation in breast tissues, but only one case showed a significant elevation compared with the control. In conclusion, MSI-Low or MSI-Stable is characteristic of most sporadic mammary tumors. Genes associated with tumorigenesis are more likely to develop MSI. ABCC9 protein and transcription abnormalities may be associated with ABCC9tetra instability.
Tumorigenesis is associated with metabolic abnormalities and genomic instability. Microsatellite mutations, including microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH), are associated with the functional impairment of some tumor-related genes. To investigate the role of MSI and LOH in sporadic breast tumors in canines, 22 tumors DNA samples and their adjacent normal tissues were evaluated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver staining for 58 microsatellites. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, promoter methylation analysis and immunohistochemical staining were used to quantify gene expression. The results revealed that a total of 14 tumors (6 benign tumors and 8 breast cancers) exhibited instability as MSI-Low tumors. Most of the microsatellite loci possessed a single occurrence of mutations. The maximum number of MSI mutations on loci was observed in tumors with a lower degree of differentiation. Among the unstable markers, FH2060 (4/22), ABCC9tetra (4/22) and SCN11A (6/22) were high-frequency mutation sites, whereas FH2060 was a high-frequency LOH site (4/22). The ABCC9tetra locus was mutated only in cancerous tissue, although it was excluded by transcription. The corresponding genes and proteins were significantly downregulated in malignant tissues, particularly in tumors with MSI. Furthermore, the promoter methylation results of the adenosine triphosphate binding cassette subfamily C member 9 (ABCC9) showed that there was a high level of methylation in breast tissues, but only one case showed a significant elevation compared with the control. In conclusion, MSI-Low or MSI-Stable is characteristic of most sporadic mammary tumors. Genes associated with tumorigenesis are more likely to develop MSI. ABCC9 protein and transcription abnormalities may be associated with ABCC9tetra instability.
Keywords:
canine breast cancer; loss of heterozygosity; microsatellite instability; oncogenesis; the adenosine triphosphate binding cassette subfamily C member 9
Tumorigenesis is a complex multistep process associated with metabolic abnormalities and genomic instability (1). Studies have shown that tumor cells differ significantly from normal cells in terms of ion channel expression activity and membrane potential (2, 3). Through electrochemical synapse ionic coupling networks, tumor cells can induce or inhibit the occurrence and metastasis of tumors (4). The adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette subfamily C, member 9 (ABCC9) can be matched with potassium channel proteins Kir6.1 (KCNJ8) or Kir6.2 (KCNJ11) to assemble ATP sensitive K+ channels (KATP) in the heart, pancreaticislets, skeletal muscle and smooth muscle (5). The KATP channel is controlled by G proteins and allows potassium to flow into the cell. Previous studies have found that blocking the activity of KATP channels can significantly inhibit the proliferation of glioma and xenografted cells, inhibit the cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase, and induce apoptosis (6, 7). In contrast, the opening of KATP located on the mitochondrial membrane can attenuate cell apoptosis by maintaining the mitochondrial membrane potential (8).As short tandem repeat DNA motifs (1–6 bp), microsatellites (MS) are ubiquitous in the eukaryotic genome, and the mutational rate of insertions/deletions in MS sequences is 10–100 times higher than that of traditional gene coding sequences. In 1993, cancer geneticists first discovered loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal tumor tissues as a result of DNA mismatch-repair pathway obstruction, revealing a new pathway for oncogenesis (9). A previous study revealed that MSI is associated with clinical and pathological features in tumor tissues (10). Patients with the MSI-positive phenotype have a more robust T lymphocyte response than microsatellite-stable (MSS) cancer patients (11, 12). In addition, recent studies have shown that the diagnosis of MSI is tissue-specific, with varying frequency and prognostic values across multiple cancer types (13–15).Mammary tumors as the common disease in female dogs. The MSI in canine mammary tumors (CMTs) has not been well-studied. Therefore, the aim of this trial was to investigated the relationship between MSI and tumor formation by screening MS loci in CMTs.
Methods
Material Collection and Histopathology Examinations
Twenty-two CMTs from different breeds of female dogs were provided by the Teaching Hospital of Nanjing Agricultural University. Procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University (NJAU - 20171019, 10 October 2017). Experiment operates were performed under the Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Jiangsu province (SYXK2017 - 0027). The mean age of the 22 canine patients was 9.77 ± 0.50 years, and the main breed was poodles (7/22, 31.8%). The adjacent normal and mammary gland tumors were excised; half of the samples were fixed in 10% formalin solution, and the remaining samples were stored at −80°C for further DNA and RNA extraction. The fixed samples were processed in a series of graded ethanol solutions and cleared with xylene. The samples were then embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 4 μm thickness, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Each stained tumor and its matched non-neoplastic tissue were examined using light microscopy.
DNA Extraction and Microsatellite Locus Identification
DNA was isolated using the Animal Tissues/Cells Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Beijing, China). Based on the instructions, 25 mg of tissue sample was used. The concentration and purity were estimated using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using 500 ng of total DNA and TaKaRa Premix Taq™ according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Takara Co., Otsu, Japan). Genomic microsatellite loci were identified as described in our previous study (16), Table 1 shows the 58 pairs of primers used in this research. The cycle conditions were as follows: an initial incubation of 94°C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at their Tm (56–60°C), 30 s at 72°C, and finally extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR amplified fragments were separated by 10% denatured polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for 8 h at 100 V; mutations were observed by silver staining.
Table 1
Primer informations.
Type
Primers
Genomic location
Amplicon size (bp)
Microsatellites
FH2305
F:TCATTGTCTCCCTTTCCCAG
CFA 30
208
R:AAGCAGGACATTCATAGCAGTG
CDK6B
F:TTGGGGCCAGATGTTGTTAG
CFA 14
285
R:GAAGGAAAAGAGAAACAAGGCAA
AHTK209
F:AGTGGTAGGTGTTCCAGCCG
CFA 20
91
R:TCGACCTCTTGAGATAACAA
C22.763
F:CAGCCCACTTCCTGGAAATA
CFA 22
206
R:GACCAGTGTGCATTAAGCC
AHT117
F:GCCTGCGTGGTACACACACA
CFA 1
84
R:GTTTACCTGCCATCATCTCA
REN287B11
F:CAGATTCCAGGTTGGGAAGA
CFA 5
348
R:AGCTGTAGGATACGCCGAGA
REN122J03
F:GTGCGAGTCATCAACAAAT
CFA 5
197
R:ACTAAAGCCCATAAATCGTG
FH3837
F:GGCCTCGTAGAATACATTTGG
CFA 5
325
R:AGCAAGGAAGGCATCTGG
CDK6A
F:TAACTTTTATTTATTTATGATA
CFA 6
163
R:GGCGCCTGCCTTTGGCCCAG
ABCC9ca
F:TCCAAGGTTTGTGTAAGGGT
CFA 27
240
R:GGATTCAAGGTATATGCCCA
HIVEP3
F:ACAGTCAAGGGTGCAAGAA
CFA 15
264
R:ATGGCTCAGCGGTTTAGTGT
TBC1D5
F:TGCCAGGCAATTACAAAAGA
CFA 23
291
R:GCAGAAATCCTTGAAGCCAG
ORF133
F:TACTTCTGTGTTCATCATCC
CFA 12
333
R:GCTTTATTCAAGTATGCTTA
REN49F22b
F:GGGGCTCTGTTATTAGGTG
CFA 22
154
R:TCATAAGGCAAAGAAAACC
15F11
F:TCTGGCTAGAGGTTTATCCA
CFA 6
234
R:ACACAGGCCTAACTCAAGAA
REN41F10
F:TACCCCAATGTTTACTGC
CFA 2
221
R:TATTTGTCTATTTTGCTCTGA
SLCA4
F:TATGCCTTGAGACTTCATCC
CFA 13
168
R:CCAGAAAGAATCTAATCCCAC
DKFZ
F:CTGGATCCTTTTCCTGTGGA
CFA 34
132
R:AGGACACCTGTTGTTCTTGG
FLJ32685
F:CTGCCTCAGCTGGGAAAATA
CFA 23
436
R:CACTACAGCTGGGATCAGCA
LRFN2A
F:TGGTTCAGTTCGTTGAGTGC
CFA 12
316
R:ATGTCTGTGGTGACGCAAAA
WNT2B
F:TGATACTGCCAGTCAGCAGG
CFA 17
277
R:GAGGGAGGAGAACCTTGGTC
LPP
F:TCAGTGAGGCAGATTTGGTG
CFA 34
415
R:CAAACGCCTTGCTTCTTGTC
MLH1
F:GGTTTAGTGCCGCCTTCAC
CFA 1
297
R:GAGAAATGCTATGTGGCAAA
REN47D17
F:GGCACTTGAGCTCTAATCCTA
CFA 1
346
R:TGCTAATGAATCCACAGAATG
REN47J11b
F:TCTCCTCGCGTGTTTCTG
CFA 18
170
R:GGGGACACTCAGAAGGACG
C26.733
F:CCCTCTACTTATGTCTCGGCC
CFA 26
255
R:GAGAGGAGAAACAACCAACACC
CXX.279
F:TGCTCAATGAAATAAGCCAGG
CFA 22
128
R:GGCGACCTTCATTCTCTGAC
C08.410
F:GAGGAAAACCAAGTGATTTTGG
CFA 8
114
R:ACCTGCAAGTGACCCTCTCT
FH2516
F:AATGGATGGAACTTAGGGCA
CFA 36
190
R:CTGCATCTGGTAACCATCGA
TRERFI
F:TTTGACCCCCCAAATGATAAA
CFA 12
164
R:CAACCGCTAAGCCACTCAG
MAML1
F:GTGATCCTGGAGTCCCGGAA
CFA 11
212
R:CACACAATGTCACGGAGGAGG
TPK1
F:AAACATACTTTTCTACATGGTT
CFA 16
167
R:TTGTAATTGTGACAGATCATAG
RYR3
F:CATGCAGATGCCCCTAATCT
CFA 30
165
R:GGTGACAGGTGATTCTTGGA
CXX873
F:CTGGCAGATTACAGGTAGC
CFA 11
145
R:GTTCTCCAAAGCACTCAT
C01.424
F:AGCTTAGCTTACTGCCCTGG
CFA 1
176
R:TCCTTTGGTTTTTAGCAGGG
HLA
F:ATCAACAATGCATGCCACAT
CFA 7
407
R:GAGGAGGTGGGGAGATTGGC
CPH14
F:GAAAGACAATCCCTGAAATGC
CFA 5
193
R:ACCCCATTTATGAGAATCATGT
ABCC9tetra
F:GCATTAAGGAGGGCACTTGA
CFA 27
219
R:TAAGACCCAGCCTTGA
FH2060
F:GTTTTGAGGAAGCCTTGCTG
CFA 14
222
R:GAAGGAAGGGGCCAGTATTC
SCN10A
F:TCCAAGCATCCTCTTATCCA
CFA 23
196
R:CCACGTTGGTCTCCCTACTTA
ANGPT1
F:GTTTTCCTGCTGTCCCAGTG
CFA 13
390
R:TTCCCTTTTGTGAATCCTGC
SCN11A
F:GCAGTTTGGGGACTGCTAAA
CFA 23
260
R:AGAATGGAATCTTGCCCAGA
IGHE
F:CAAGACTGGCTCTGCTCTG
CFA 8
141
R:CCACTGAAAACAAGCCCATC
CDH4
F:AAGTCAACAAGCTCCATCCC
CFA 24
136
R:AGGATTTTCCCCTAAGAGCTG
PPP1R9A
F:TAAAGATCCAAGTGGCGAGG
CFA 14
189
R:AACCACTCCCTTCACCACAG
9A5
F:GTCTGCTTTCAACTCAGGTC
CFA 4
266
R:CTCTAAACTGGACTTCGTGG
FH2401
F:CTGATTCTGCCCATTGGG
CFA 12
224
R:ATGTAAGCTCTACTGGGGTACTGG
FH2377
F:TCCCTTGGGGAAGTAGAGTG
CFA 34
312
R:TAGCTAATGTGGTTAACGGTTACC
REN198P23
F:TTGTACATTATCTGTTCTACCTCGG
CFA 9
132
R:TCTTCAGCAGGCCTTTTCTC
AHT137
F:TACAGAGCTCTTAACTGGGTCC
CFA 11
137
R:CCTTGCAAAGTGTCATTGCT
FH3113
F:CTGAATTATGGGAAAACATGG
CFA 5
207
R:CAGGGAAGGAAGAAAACAGC
FH2594
F:TTTAAGGAGCTGCTCATGCA
CFA 5
311
R:CTGAAATTCCTGGCCCAGTA
FH2561
F:TGCTCAAGGTTGAATAAATATGC
CFA 6
364
R:TTTATGGCCTGTGGGCTC
FH2175
F:TTCATTGATTTCTCCATTGGC
CFA 16
253
R:AGGACTCTAAAAACTTGCCTCC
FH2495
F:ATTTCATATGTGAGGCTGAGATTG
CFA 24
132
R:CAGTGGGAGAAAGATGCCAT
BTN1A1
F:CTGCCATGTAGGGTGTTT
CFA 12
240
R:ACCCTTTGACAAGAGCTC
CPH5
F:TCCATAACAAGACCCCAAAC
CFA 17
114
R:GGAGGTAGGGGTCAAAAGTT
C13.900
F:TTGGACTTCTAATTTTTCATT
CFA 13
128
R:CAACTGACTAAATCTCCTAATG
Genes
GAPDH
F:ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC
U94889
268
R:CCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTGA
A5B
F:GCACGGAAAATACAGCGTTT
NM_001686
187
R:TTGCCACAGCTTCTTCAATG
HPRT
F:TGCTCGAGATGTGATGAAGG
NM_000194
192
R:TCCCCTGTTGACTGGTCATT
β-actin
F:GATATCGCCGCGCTCGTCGTC
U39357
384
R:GGCTGGGGTGTTGAAGGTCTC
RPS5
F:GGATGACCGAGTGGGAGA
XM_022427163
122
R:TGCAATGTAGTCCTGCAAAGA
RPL8
F:AGGTCATTTCTTCCGCCAA
XM_853403
164
R:AGGATGCTCCACAGGATTCA
RPL32
F:ATGCCCAACATTGGTTATGG
XM_540107
181
R:CTCTTTCCACGATGGCTTTG
ABCC9
F:TGTGCATCATCTGTTTTTGTGCT
NC_006609
183
R:TTAGGGCCTGCTATGGGCTA
BSP analysis
ABCC9-1
F:AGAGTGGAGGAGGGAGAAGTAGGTTTTATG
265
R:CAAACAATCCCCRAACACACACCTAAATATC
ABCC9-2
F:GTGATAAATAGTTTYGGGGGGTAGTTGG
228
R:ACCTAAAAAAACTAAAACCRACCCCCCC
Primer informations.MSI was defined as addition or deletion of fragments to one or both tumor DNA alleles compared with normal tissues; LOH was defined as a reduction in the DNA signal intensity of tumor allele at least 50% (17). Positive cases were repeated three times to confirm the results. For MSI identification, mutation products were purified and cloned into the pMD19-T vector (Takara Co., Otsu, Japan) and sequencing. Sequence alignments were conducted using DNAMAN software v9.0.1.
RNA Extraction and mRNA Analysis
Total RNA was isolated using the Total RNA Extraction Kit (Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Beijing, China). Based on the instructions, 100 mg of tissue sample was used. The size of the RNA samples was estimated using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). Reverse transcription was performed using 800 ng of total RNA treated with DNase I and PrimeScript RT Master Mix Perfect Real Time according to the manufacturer's instructions (Takara Co., Otsu, Japan).The mRNA levels of MSI-mutated adjacent genes were detected by quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR). Target sequences were amplified using Green Fast qPCR Mix (Takara Co., Otsu, Japan) and analyzed with an ABI 7300 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The primer information is presented in Table 1. The cycle conditions were as follows: 95°C for 15 s followed by 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 31 s for 40 cycles. The specific of each gene primer was confirmed by melting curve performance and gel electrophoresis. Results were presented as CT mean values of three technique replicates.Reference genes were evaluated using geNorm v3.5 and NormFinder v0.953. Finally, the geometric means of A5B, RPL8, GAPDH, RPL32, RPS5, β-actin, and HRPT were used for normalization.
DNA Methylation Analysis
DNA methylation was measured using next-generation sequencing based bisulfite sequencing PCR (18). First, DNA modification with sodium bisulfite of 6 canine breast cancers and matched samples was performed using an EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The sequence included 2,000 bp upstream of the ABCC9 transcription start site and 1,000 bp downstream (a total of 3 kb). Elution products were then used as templates for PCR amplification with 35 cycles using the KAPA 2G Robust HotStart PCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA). The primers for BSP were designed using online MethPrimer software (Table 1). The bisulfite sequencing PCR products of each sample were pooled equally, 5'-phosphorylated, 3'-dA-tailed and ligated to a barcoded adapter using T4 DNA ligase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Foster city, CA, USA). The barcoded libraries were then prepared and sequenced on an Illumina platform. Using the clean sequencing reads directly aligned to the target sequences, Bsmap v2.73 software was used with the default parameters. Methylation level was defined as the fraction of “C” read counts in the total read counts of both “C” and “T” for each covered C site. According to the method of Lister (19), each methylation context calculates the probability mass function, and only those CGs covered by at least 200 reads in one sample were considered for testing.
Immunohistochemical Analysis
Tissue sections were taken from 22 CMTs along with adjacent controls after fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydration, and embedding in paraffin. The expression of ABCC9 (1:200, Affinity Biosciences Cat# DF9255) in the breast was examined using an SP immunohistochemistry kit (Sangon Biotech Co., Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A semiquantitative determination was conducted with Image J software to detect protein expression. The immunohistochemical staining intensity was expressed in average optical density (AOD) units, AOD = integrated optical density (IOD)/Area; five fields were randomly selected in a blinded manner, counted for the signal density of tissue areas, and then statistically analyzed.
Data Analysis and Statistics
The statistical analyses were conducted with GraphPad Prism software version 8.0 and SPSS version 21.0. A genome map of microsatellite loci was constructed using the MapChart program. The comparison of results between MSI/LOH and tumor type and methylation data were performed using Fisher's exact test. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to analyze vs. benign and breast cancer groups. The relative mRNA expression levels of ABCC9 in tumors and matched normal tissues were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The t-test was performed to compare the relative mRNA level and protein expression between the two groups. The results are presented as the mean ± SD. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 for all analyses.
Results
The Pathological Identification of CMTs
The 22 CMTs were classified as either benign (8/22, 36.4%) or malignant (14/22, 63.6%) (Figure 1). Based on the predominant cell type, the benign tumors were subclassified as fibroadenoma (4/8, 50%), complex adenoma (1/8, 12.5%), adenoma (1/8, 12.5%), or intraductal papilloma (2/8, 25%). The malignant tumors were subclassified into invasive ductal carcinoma (7/14, 50%), situ carcinoma (1/14, 7.1%), ductal carcinoma (1/14, 7.1%), complex carcinoma (2/14, 14.3%), intraductal papillary carcinoma (2/14, 14.3%), or solid carcinoma (1/14, 7.1%).
Figure 1
Macroscopic observation and HE staining of CMTs. (A) Macroscopic observation of CMT, the skin surface of the tumor ruptured. (B) Macroscopic observation of CMT, a cauliflow-like mass in mammary gland with obviously boundary and hard texture. (C) Macroscopic observation of CMT, the tumor located on the mammary tissue with a great size. (D) HE staining of the breast lobules in a normal dog (400×). (E) HE staining of mammary gland adenoma (200×), the capsule is intact and tumor cells grow in the enlarged lumen. (F) HE staining of mammary gland adenoma (400×), Adenoma arising in the glandular tissue, myoepithelial cells are inconspicuous, the islands of neoplastic cells are separated by a fine fibrovascular connective. (G) HE staining of solid carcinoma (200×). (H) HE staining for ductal carcinoma (200×), tumor cells invaded the connective tissue, glandular ducts were disappeared. (I) HE staining for ductal carcinoma (400×), tumor cells are pleomorphic and mitotic.
Macroscopic observation and HE staining of CMTs. (A) Macroscopic observation of CMT, the skin surface of the tumor ruptured. (B) Macroscopic observation of CMT, a cauliflow-like mass in mammary gland with obviously boundary and hard texture. (C) Macroscopic observation of CMT, the tumor located on the mammary tissue with a great size. (D) HE staining of the breast lobules in a normal dog (400×). (E) HE staining of mammary gland adenoma (200×), the capsule is intact and tumor cells grow in the enlarged lumen. (F) HE staining of mammary gland adenoma (400×), Adenoma arising in the glandular tissue, myoepithelial cells are inconspicuous, the islands of neoplastic cells are separated by a fine fibrovascular connective. (G) HE staining of solid carcinoma (200×). (H) HE staining for ductal carcinoma (200×), tumor cells invaded the connective tissue, glandular ducts were disappeared. (I) HE staining for ductal carcinoma (400×), tumor cells are pleomorphic and mitotic.
Malignant Tumors Have More MS Mutation Loci Than Benign Tumors
Using the panel of 58 MS markers, a LOH/MSI analysis between tumor tissues and their matched non-neoplastic tissues was carry out, the variation in the electropherogram of MS makers was described in Figure 2A. Differential bands were extracted and sequenced (Figure 2B). The sequencing result verified that the mutation form of MS in CMTs mainly included the insertion or deletion of nucleic acid fragments in repeated sequences. In addition, point mutations were also discovered in flank conserved sequences of MSI loci. Based on the National Cancer Institute guidelines (20), 14 tumors (14/22, 63.6%) were defined as MSI-L (MSI-Low), and 8 tumors were defined as MSS (MSI-Stable) (Table 2). Of the MSI-L tumors, 5 were diagnosed as benign tumors, and 9 were diagnosed as breast cancers. In addition, we found that the phenomenon of LOH was present in 6 MSI-L tumors (6/14, 42.9%), of which 2 tumors were benign and 4 tumors were malignant. There was no evidence of a difference in mutation rates between MSI and LOH in benign or malignant tumors (Fisher's test, P > 0.05). However, the histological type was significantly correlated with the number of MSI loci. Malignant tumors had more MS mutation loci than benign tumors (P < 0.05) (Figure 2C). Case 13 had the highest frequency of MSI (10/58, 17.2%) in this study, which was defined by pathological grading as grade III.
Figure 2
MSI and LOH occurring in CMTs. (A) MSI and LOH detection in denatured polyacrylamide gels. (B) The sequencing result of MSI locus, there was a repetitive fragment insertion in tumors. (C) Carcinomas have more mutation loci than benign tumors. *indicates a significant difference between the two groups, P < 0.05.
Table 2
Information of canine mammary tumors.
Case no.
Age
Breed
Tumor Histo-type
MSI/LOH mutation
Tumor type
1
8
Pomeranian
Intraductal papilloma
MSS
2
9
Golden retriever
Invasive ductal carcinoma
MSI
MSI-L
3
13
Mongrel dog
Invasive ductal carcinoma
MSI
MSI-L
4
8
Poodle
Situ carcinoma
MSI/LOH
MSI-L
5
12
Pomeranian
Complex adenoma
MSS
6
11
Poodle
Adenoma
MSI/LOH
MSI-L
7
11
Mongrel dog
Ductal carcinoma
MSI
MSI-L
8
5
Poodle
Fibroadenoma
MSS
9
9
Schnauzer
Complex carcinoma
MSS
10
8
Bichon Frise
Intraductal papillary carcinoma
MSI
MSI-L
11
11
Rottweiler
Complex carcinoma
MSI/LOH
MSI-L
12
9
Samoyed
Fibroadenoma
MSI
MSI-L
13
12
Border Collie
Solid carcinoma
MSI/LOH
MSI-L
14
10
Poodle
Invasive ductal carcinoma
MSI/LOH
MSI-L
15
7
Poodle
Fibroadenoma
MSI
MSI-L
16
9
Poodle
Intraductal papillary carcinoma
MSS
17
13
Mongrel dog
Invasive ductal carcinoma
MSI
MSI-L
18
10
Samoyed
Invasive ductal carcinoma
MSS
19
5
Poodle
Invasive ductal carcinoma
MSS
20
13
Mongrel dog
Intraductal papilloma
MSI/LOH
MSI-L
21
10
Yorkshire
Invasive ductal carcinoma
MSS
22
12
Mongrel dog
Fibroadenoma
MSI
MSI-L
MSI and LOH occurring in CMTs. (A) MSI and LOH detection in denatured polyacrylamide gels. (B) The sequencing result of MSI locus, there was a repetitive fragment insertion in tumors. (C) Carcinomas have more mutation loci than benign tumors. *indicates a significant difference between the two groups, P < 0.05.Information of canine mammary tumors.
Tetranucleotide Microsatellites Are Prone to Instability in CMTs
A total of 44 aberrations of MSI were found at 27 MS loci (27/58, 46.5%), which were distributed across 17 chromosomes (Figure 3). The classification of mutated MS markers in this study was shown in Table 3. In addition to dinucleotide [CA]n, tetranucleotide [CTTT]n and more complex types of microsatellite loci also has a high mutation frequency in this research. Among them, most of MS loci were only mutated once (1/14, 7.1%). The interrupted marker SCN11A (6/14, 42.9%) and tetranucleotide markers FH2060 (4/14, 28.6%) and ABCC9tetra (4/14, 28.6%) were loci with high mutation rate from the result. Moreover, the phenomenon of LOH was also observed on FH2060 (4/6, 66.75%), SCN11A (2/6, 33.3%), ABCC9tetra (1/6, 16.7%) and PPP1RA (1/6, 16.7%). Table 4 shows the mutation results for ABCC9tetra, FH2060 and SCN11A markers in CMTs. There were five tumor cases had at least two loci mutated as MSI or LOH for ABCC9tetra, FH2060 and SCN11A. Because of the locus of ABCC9tetra was only mutated in malignant group, the relationship between ABCC9tetra and breast cancer were studied.
Figure 3
Genome map of microsatellite loci in this study. MSS are depicted in black, the single mutation of microsatellite loci is labeled blue, twice mutation is green, four times mutation is brown, and six is marked in red.
Table 3
Classification of mutated microsatellite DNA markers.
Motif
Marker
Sequence
Number
Pure Di
TBC1D5
[CT]21
1
TPK1
[CA]20
2
C01.424
[CA]13
1
MLH1
[CT]21
1
ABCC9ca
[CA]19
1
REN47D17
[CA]16
1
15F11
[CA]10
1
CXX.279
[CA]17
2
REN47J11b
[CA]11
1
WNT2B
[CA]21
1
REN198P23
[CA]15
1
DKFZ
[CT]20
1
Ren41F10
[CA]20
1
Pure Tetra
FH2060
[AATG]5
4
FH2377
[CTTT]4
1
PPP1R9A
[GTTT]9
1
9A5
[CTTT]18
1
FH2401
[CTTT]11
1
FH2561
[CTTT]21
1
HLA
[CTTT]13
2
ABCC9tetra
[CTTT]8
4
Pure Penta
BTN1A1
[CTTTT]3
1
Compound Tetra
LPP
[TTCC]5[CTTT]15
2
FLJ32685
[CTTT]14[CTTTT]14
2
Interrupted
SCN11A
[CAAT]3[CTAT]4 CATC[TATC]5
6
FH3113
[TG]7 A[GT]3[ACGC]2
2
ANGPT1
[CCTT]12T[CTTT]11
1
Table 4
Frequency of ABCC9tetra, FH2060, and SCN11A in MS mutation tumors.
Type
Cases
ABCC9tetra
FH2060
SCN11A
Benign
6
I
LOH
MSI/LOH
12
I
I
I
15
I
I
I
20
I
LOH
MSI
22
I
I
MSI
Mutation frequency (%)
0
40
60
Cancer
2
I
I
I
3
I
MSI
MSI
4
MSI
MSI/LOH
I
7
MSI
I
I
10
I
I
MSI
11
MSI
MSI
MSI/LOH
13
I
MSI/LOH
I
14
MSI/LOH
I
I
17
I
I
I
Mutation frequency (%)
44.44
44.44
33.33
I indicated that LOH or MSI does not occur at this site, and LOH/MSI indicates that both LOH and MSI occur at this site.
Genome map of microsatellite loci in this study. MSS are depicted in black, the single mutation of microsatellite loci is labeled blue, twice mutation is green, four times mutation is brown, and six is marked in red.Classification of mutated microsatellite DNA markers.Frequency of ABCC9tetra, FH2060, and SCN11A in MS mutation tumors.I indicated that LOH or MSI does not occur at this site, and LOH/MSI indicates that both LOH and MSI occur at this site.
ABCC9 Is Downregulated in Canine Breast Cancer
NCBI revealed that ABCC9tetra was located in the intron region of ABCC9, and the mutation in this locus did not cause a frameshift mutation in open reading frame. But the result of QRT–PCR showed that the mRNA level of ABCC9 was significantly downregulated in the malignant group (P < 0.05) (Figure 4A). And the result of immunohistochemistry was similar to it. The AOD value showed that the expression of ABCC9 protein in malignant tumors was significantly lower than that in para-cancer tissues and benign tumors (P < 0.05) (Figure 4B). Strongly positive cells can be observed in normal and para-cancer tissues (Figure 4C) and even in benign tumors (Figure 4D). However, the number of ABCC9 positive cells was significant decreased in malignant tumors (Figure 4E). Moreover, the expression of ABCC9 protein may be related to the cellular composition and pathological grading. In the tumor sample of grade III, ABCC9 strongly positive cells almost disappeared, and were only weakly or micro-expressed in cells (Figure 4F). In addition, ABCC9 protein expression and mRNA levels were significantly reduced in tumor samples with ABCC9tetra locus instability (P < 0.05).
Figure 4
The mRNA level and protein expression of ABCC9. (A) The mRNA level of ABCC9, the mRNA level was expression by 2−ΔΔCt. (B) Average optical density values of ABCC9 protein in CMTs. AOD = IOD/Area, all of data are shown as means ± SD, *indicates that there is significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05). (C) IHC staining of ABCC9 in paracancer tissue (200×). (D) IHC staining of ABCC9 in benign tumor (200×). (E) IHC staining of ABCC9 in complex breast cancer (200×). (F) No strong positive staining of ABCC9 in higher malignancy cells (200×). Strongly positive cells can be observed in para-cancer tissues and benign tumors, but was significant decreased in malignant tumors.
The mRNA level and protein expression of ABCC9. (A) The mRNA level of ABCC9, the mRNA level was expression by 2−ΔΔCt. (B) Average optical density values of ABCC9 protein in CMTs. AOD = IOD/Area, all of data are shown as means ± SD, *indicates that there is significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05). (C) IHC staining of ABCC9 in paracancer tissue (200×). (D) IHC staining of ABCC9 in benign tumor (200×). (E) IHC staining of ABCC9 in complex breast cancer (200×). (F) No strong positive staining of ABCC9 in higher malignancy cells (200×). Strongly positive cells can be observed in para-cancer tissues and benign tumors, but was significant decreased in malignant tumors.Total of 6 tumor sample with ABCC9 mRNA levels significantly reduced were tested by methylation analysis. MathPrimer software detected a 703 bp CpG island in ABCC9 5′UTR (GC = 65.4%, and Obs/Exp ratio = 0.92). The methylation results of ABCC9 promoter CpG island revealed that high levels of methylation occurred at multiple sites in cancer tissues, but no new methylation sites were formed (Figure 5A). There was no significant difference in methylation level of each site (Figure 5C). And only one cancer sample showed significantly higher promoter methylation level than the control tissue (P < 0.05), with both MSI and LOH (Figure 5B).
Figure 5
Methylation analysis of ABCC9 promoter. (A) Methylation analysis of ABCC9 CpG island. (B) Methylation CpG levels of six samples. (C) Methylation levels in average CpG sites. *indicates a significant difference between the two groups, P < 0.05.
Methylation analysis of ABCC9 promoter. (A) Methylation analysis of ABCC9 CpG island. (B) Methylation CpG levels of six samples. (C) Methylation levels in average CpG sites. *indicates a significant difference between the two groups, P < 0.05.
Discussion
Genomic instability is a hallmark of tumors, and tumor tissue has a higher mutation rate than non-tumor tissue. Study showed that the sensitivity of MSI detection is not limited by tumor heterogeneity or normal tissue contamination when large resection tissues are used (21). The most endorsed explanation of MS mutagenesis is the slip strand mispairing model, and repeated numbers of motifs are highly polymorphic among individuals. A previous study of an MS mutation model showed that deletion is produced by the misalignment loop in the template chain, and insertion is subsequently produced in the nascent chain (22, 23). According to the sequence alignment analysis, we found that MS mutations mainly included the insertion or deletion of repeat sequences and point mutations of flanking conserved sequences. In addition, in the same MS locus, the forms of the mutations were differed among the samples. This phenomenon may be due to the mutation of MS occurring at different stages of tumor cell replication, whereas the point mutation may be caused by the suppression of mismatch repair genes. The length and unit type of MS and DNA shape are the main factors influencing DNA fragility and have the greatest influence on the mutation rate (24). In addition to dinucleotides, tetranucleotides and interrupted MS also showed frequent mutations in our research, which confirmed the susceptibility of the DNA structure to mutation.The guidelines of the National Cancer Institute suggest that MS that display instability at ≥ 2 loci or instability at ≥ 30–40% of loci (more than five loci) be defined as MSI-High (MSI-H). If all tumor MS loci are comparable to their normal specimen, the tumor is classified as MSS. The range between MSS and MSI-H is defined as MSI-L (20). To date, tumors with an MSI-H frequency of 0% and tumors with MSI mutations all exhibited the MSI-L type, which is consistent with studies by Eldama'ria and Ando (17, 25). Work by Dustin showed that 800 loci are required to achieve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for HBC, and diagnosis using predefined microsatellite locus panels is challenging (26). Overall, 31 MS loci were stable, and 27 MS loci exhibited MSI. Different cancer types exhibited distinct patterns of MS mutations. It appears that for breast tumors, the instability event may have a more neutral fitness effect, resulting in fewer recurrent mutation loci.Although there was no significant difference in the frequency of MSI or LOH between benign and malignant tumors, malignant tumors had more MSI mutation loci than benign tumors. Of the 23 that we previously reported (4 benign and 19 malignant tumors), ABCC9tetra, FLJ32685, SCN11A and 9A5 loci showed a higher incidence of instability events in most canine breast cancers (16). In the present work, ABCC9tetra (4/22, 18.2%) and SCN11A (6/22, 27.3%) loci also exhibited higher mutation rates in CMTs. Our newly discovered high-frequency MSI locus, FH2060 (4/22, 18.2%), also had the highest LOH frequency (4/22, 18.2%). This phenomenon is potentially caused by selective pressures in tumor evolution (14). Biological pressures are involved in the selection of MS mutations, and some specific MS may be subject to positive or negative selection through changes in gene expression or function that result in more malignant transformation such as proliferation and metastasis (27, 28). Furthermore, a previous study showed that LOH can confer a growth advantage in tumor cells, and the tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 loci are frequently altered due to allelic imbalance during carcinogenesis in the breast (29). Therefore, we suspected that the MSI locus was involved in the formation of breast tumors and began to explore the genes adjacent to the MSI locus.Cancer genome sequencing has revealed that regional autosomal differential mutation rates at megabase resolution are related to changes in the timing of DNA replication or in gene expression and are less correlated with cancer type (30). The effect of DNA damage on highly expressed genes is limited to the MS within a specific gene in a specific tissue. In our results, ABCC9tetra, an MS locus, was mutated only in malignant tumors. The expression of adjacent gene ABCC9 was significantly decreased in the malignant tumor group. It is worth noting that the ABCC9 protein is involved in bioelectric control. ABCC9 can couples with potassium channel proteins KCNJ8 or KCNJ11 to form the KATP channel. The KATP channels were located on cell membranes and mitochondrial membranes. Past studies have shown that the channels formed by different combinations of KCNJ8, KCNJ11, ABCC8, and ABCC9 vary based on tissue localization (31). Immunohistochemistry reflected that ABCC9 was overexpressed in both normal and paracancerous tissues and in benign tumors, indicating that it is involved in the assembly of the KATP channel in the breast.The ionic concentrations of Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Cl− are regulated by ion channels. In this study, ABCC9 on cell membranes and the mRNA level of ABCC9 were significantly decreased in malignant tissues. Furthermore, a negative correlation was observed between ABCC9 expression and cancer grading, with positive cells basically disappearing in cancer samples of grade III. This relationship may be due to the inhibition of the KATP channel in cancer tissue. The cytoplasm of depolarized cells is more positively charged relative to the extracellular space and has a less negative Vmem (32). Inhibition of potassium influx can lead to continuous depolarization of cells, which can induce mitosis and promote the proliferation of cancer cells (33, 34). Furthermore, a study of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injuries revealed that the opening of mitoKATP channels could inhibit the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane and protect against apoptosis in its early stages (35).In addition, many studies have shown that ABCC9 can be used as a biomarker for cancers. The enrichment analysis of gastric cancer found that ABCC9 was involved in ATPase activity, transmembrane transport, and ABC transporters (36). Another study on the methylation pattern of breast cancer revealed that ABCC9 is a potential grade III biomarker of breast cancer in white individuals. However, in our study, only one case of cancer showed a significant increase in promoter CpG islands, which could not explain the reduced gene expression.In conclusion, CMT is a highly heterogeneous disease with multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations. Malignant tumors have more unstable loci than benign tumors, which may be related to altered gene expression. ABCC9 is significantly downregulated in breast cancer and ABCC9tetra is particularly prone to mutation. In the future, additional studies on the regulation of ABCC9 protein in cancer cells are needed.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University (NJAU-20171019, 10 October 2017). Experiment operates were performed under the Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Jiangsu province (SYXK2017-0027). Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.
Author Contributions
PH and DWY: conceptualization. PH: methodology, software, formal analysis, resources, data curation, and writing-original draft preparation. SQW and XJH: validation. KYS: investigation. DWY: writing-review, editing and visualization. DJY: supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20130686), National Natural Science Foundation of China (30871847), and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors: Y Ando; H Iwase; S Ichihara; S Toyoshima; T Nakamura; H Yamashita; T Toyama; Y Omoto; S Karamatsu; S Mitsuyama; Y Fujii; S Kobayashi Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2000-08-11 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Ryan Lister; Mattia Pelizzola; Robert H Dowen; R David Hawkins; Gary Hon; Julian Tonti-Filippini; Joseph R Nery; Leonard Lee; Zhen Ye; Que-Minh Ngo; Lee Edsall; Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget; Ron Stewart; Victor Ruotti; A Harvey Millar; James A Thomson; Bing Ren; Joseph R Ecker Journal: Nature Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Daniela F Fukushiro-Lopes; Alexandra D Hegel; Vidhya Rao; Debra Wyatt; Andrew Baker; Eun-Kyoung Breuer; Clodia Osipo; Jeremiah J Zartman; Miranda Burnette; Simon Kaja; Dimitrios Kouzoukas; Sarah Burris; W Keith Jones; Saverio Gentile Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-12-04