| Literature DB >> 35070966 |
Tarek Mohamed Kamal Motawi1, Nermin Abdel Hamid Sadik1, Dina Sabry2,3, Sally Atef Fahim4, Nancy Nabil Shahin1.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a universal health problem that is particularly alarming in Egypt. The major risk factor for HCC is hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection which is a main burden in Egypt. The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is a stem cell marker involved in the tumorigenesis and progression of many malignancies, including HCC. We investigated the association of -935 C/G single nucleotide polymorphism in EpCAM promoter region (rs62139665) with HCC risk, EpCAM expression and overall survival in Egyptians. A total of 266 patients (128 HCV and 138 HCC cases) and 117 age- and sex-matched controls participated in this study. Genotyping, performed using allelic discrimination and confirmed by sequencing, revealed a significant association between EpCAM rs62139665 and HCC susceptibility, with higher GG genotype and G allele distribution in HCC patients than in non-HCC subjects. Such association was not detected in HCV patients compared to controls. EpCAM gene expression levels, determined in blood by RT-qPCR, and its serum protein expression levels, determined by ELISA, were significantly higher in GG relative to GC+CC genotype carriers in HCV and HCC patients in a recessive model. ROC analysis of EpCAM protein levels revealed significant discriminatory power between HCC patients and non-HCC subjects, with improved diagnostic accuracy when combining α-fetoprotein and EpCAM compared to that of α-fetoprotein alone. Altogether, EpCAM rs62139665 polymorphism is significantly associated with HCC and with EpCAM gene and protein expression levels in the Egyptian population. Moreover, serum EpCAM levels may hold promise for HCC diagnosis and for improving the diagnostic accuracy of α-fetoprotein.Entities:
Keywords: Egyptians; epithelial cell adhesion molecule; hepatitis C virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; single nucleotide polymorphism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35070966 PMCID: PMC8766815 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.754104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Demographic characteristics and laboratory data in the HCV, HCC patients and healthy controls.
| Control (n=117) | HCV (n=128) | HCC (n=138) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 49.17 ± 18.69 | 48.29 ± 13.2 | 52.28 ± 10.29 | 0.06 |
|
| ||||
|
| 62 (52.9%) | 76 (59.4%) | 83 (60.1%) | 0.46 |
|
| 55 (47.1%) | 52 (40.6%) | 55 (39.9%) | |
|
| 10.82 ± 1.14 | 13.89 ± 1.48† | 12.59 ± 1.67†‡ | <0.0001 |
|
| 4.16 ± 1.12 | 6.49 ± 1.96† | 5.73 ± 2.15†‡ | <0.0001 |
|
| 186.4 ± 77.48 | 238.62 ± 110.22† | 138.61 ± 62.31†‡ | <0.0001 |
|
| 92.03 ± 5.73 | 79.72 ± 25.73† | 76.86 ± 13.05† | <0.0001 |
|
| 1.09 ± 0.11 | 1.08 ± 0.11 | 1.24 ± 0.19†‡ | 0.002 |
|
| 0.21 ± 0.13 | 0.39 ± 0.25† | 0.51 ± 0.34†‡ | <0.0001 |
|
| 0.91 ± 0.22 | 0.77 ± 0.3† | 1.22 ± 0.59†‡ | <0.0001 |
|
| 27.55 ± 6.51 | 46.89 ± 24.07† | 59.2 ± 36.13†‡ | <0.0001 |
|
| 26.82 ± 6.35 | 54.65 ± 36.31† | 70.21 ± 39.11†‡ | <0.0001 |
|
| 78.54 ± 29.51 | 125.72 ± 67.01† | 180.89 ± 58.54†‡ | <0.0001 |
|
| 4.13 ± 0.58 | 4.22 ± 0.42 | 3.36 ± 0.52†‡ | <0.0001 |
|
| 0.98 ± 0.63 | 0.88 ± 0.21 | 0.86 ± 0.22† | 0.038 |
|
| 3.95 ± 1.89 | 6.82 ± 15.81 | 662.45 ± 1462.1†‡ | <0.0001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, or n (%).
Gender data were compared using Chi square (X2) test. The rest of the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
†Significant difference from the control group.
‡Significant difference from the HCV group.
WBCs, white blood cells; PC, prothrombin concentration; PT-INR, prothrombin time-international normalized ratios; D Bil, direct bilirubin; T Bil, total bilirubin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein.
Hardy Weinberg equilibrium for EpCAM -935 C/G (rs62139665).
| Group | Observed frequency | Expected frequency |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | CC | GC | GG | CC | GC | GG | |
|
| 45 | 60 | 12 | 48.08 | 53.85 | 15.08 | 0.22 |
|
| 58 | 56 | 14 | 57.78 | 56.44 | 13.78 | 0.93 |
|
| 35 | 69 | 34 | 35 | 69 | 34 | 0.99 |
The Chi square test was used to determine deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE).
Frequency distribution for genotypes and alleles for EpCAM rs62139665 in patients and control groups.
| Control | HCV | HCC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 45 (0.39) | 58 (0.45) | 35 (0.25) | |
|
| 60 (0.51) | 56 (0.44) | 69 (0.5) | |
|
| 12 (0.1) | 14 (0.11) | 34 (0.25) | |
|
| 0.04† | 0.48‡ | 0.0005§ | 0.0006¶ |
|
| 150 (0.64) | 172 (0.67) | 139 (0.51) | |
|
| 84 (0.36) | 84 (0.33) | 137 (0.49) | |
|
| 0.001† | 0.47‡ | <0.0001§ | 0.0001¶ |
Data are expressed as N (%).
†χ2 test for difference in the frequency in HCC vs control.
‡χ2 test for difference in the frequency in HCV vs control.
§χ2 test for difference in the frequency in HCC vs HCV.
¶χ2 test for difference in the frequency in the study population.
Figure 1Allelic discrimination plot for EpCAM rs62139665 G/C alleles showing the C/C genotype (represented by upper left dots) near the Y-axis, the G/G genotype (represented by lower right dots) near the X-axis, and the G/C genotype in the middle between both axes.
Genotype and allele frequency of EpCAM -935 C/G polymorphism in different study groups and its association to HCV and HCC risk by logistic regression analysis.
| Genotype/Allele | Control (117) N(%) | HCV (128) N(%) | HCC (138) N(%) | OR† (95% CI) |
| OR‡ (95% CI) |
| OR§ (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CC | 45 | 58 | 35 | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| (38.5%) | (45.3%) | (25.4%) | ||||||||
| GC | 60 | 56 | 69 | 1.47 | 0.2 | 0.72 | 0.28 | 2.04 | 0.01 | |
| (51.3%) | (43.8%) | (50%) | (0.84-2.59) | (0.42-1.23) | (1.18-3.53) | |||||
| GG | 12 | 14 | 34 | 3.64 | 0.001 | 0.9 | 0.83 | 4.02 | 0.0002 | |
| (10.2%) | (10.9%) | (24.6%) | (1.64-8.04) | (0.38-2.15) | (1.89-8.52) | |||||
|
| GC + GG | 72 | 70 | 103 | 1.84 | 0.03 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 2.43 | 0.0008 |
| (61.5) | (54.7%) | (74.6%) | (1.07-3.14) | (0.45-1.25) | (1.45-4.09) | |||||
|
| GC + CC | 105 | 114 | 104 | 2.86 | 0.003 | 1.07 | 1 | 2.66 | 0.004 |
| (89.7%) | (89.1%) | (75.4%) | (1.4-5.83) | (0.47-2.43) | (1.35-5.23) | |||||
|
| CC+GG | 57 | 72 | 69 | 1.05 | 0.9 | 1.35 | 0.25 | 0.78 | 0.32 |
| (48.7%) | (56.2%) | (50%) | (0.64-1.72) | (0.81-2.24) | (0.47-1.26) | |||||
|
| C | 150 | 172 | 139 | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| (64.1%) | (67.2%) | (50.4%) | ||||||||
| G | 84 | 84 | 137 | 1.76 | 0.002 | 0.87 | 0.5 | 2.02 | 0.0001 | |
| (35.9%) | (32.8%) | (49.6%) | (1.23-2.51) | (0.6-1.26) | (1.41-2.86) |
The odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) of 95 percent were estimated by logistic regression for association analysis.
†HCC vs Control.
‡HCV vs Control.
§HCC vs HCV.
HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus; OR, odds ratio.
The associations of the biochemical parameters and the EpCAM -935 C/G polymorphism in HCC patients.
| Genotype/Parameter | GC + CC (n = 104) | GG (n = 34) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 12.57 ± 1.58 | 12.67 ± 1.93 | 0.75 |
|
| 5.82 ± 1.99 | 5.45 ± 2.62 | 0.39 |
|
| 142 ± 61.18 | 128.3 ± 65.54 | 0.27 |
|
| 77.42 ± 13.61 | 75.16 ± 11.23 | 0.38 |
|
| 1.23 ± 0.21 | 1.26 ± 0.14 | 0.37 |
|
| 0.5 ± 0.37 | 0.54 ± 0.27 | 0.58 |
|
| 1.21 ± 0.6 | 1.27 ± 0.58 | 0.6 |
|
| 56.42 ± 34.97 | 67.82 ± 38.81 | 0.11 |
|
| 67.45 ± 38.25 | 67.73 ± 33.78 | 0.59 |
|
| 173.7 ± 56.29 | 205 ± 60.56 | 0.01* |
|
| 3.33 ± 0.56 | 3.46 ± 0.39 | 0.23 |
|
| 0.86 ± 0.23 | 0.86 ± 0.19 | 0.99 |
|
| 15.31 ± 9.15 | 13.03 ± 8.87 | 0.22 |
|
| 9 (6-11) | 10 (6-15) | 0.2 |
|
|
|
| 0.32 |
|
| 238.4 ± 430 | 1947 ± 2445 | <0.0001* |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range), P < 0.05 was significant. Data were compared using Student’s t-test for parametric tests, Mann‐Whitney test for non-parametric tests and Chi square test for categorical variables.
WBCs, white blood cells; PC, prothrombin concentration; PT-INR, prothrombin time-international normalized ratios; D Bil, direct bilirubin; T Bil, total bilirubin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; MELD, model for end‐stage liver disease; A, B and C, Child-Pugh grades A (5 to 6 points, B (7 to 9 points) and C (10 to 15 points) according to the criteria indicated by Child and Turcotte (26); AFP, alpha-fetoprotein.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank survival curves for HCC patients in relation to EpCAM rs62139665 genotypes in a recessive model.
Gene and protein expression levels of EpCAM in different genotypes of rs62139665.
| Groups | Genotype | Gene expression levels | Protein expression levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 2.71 ± 0.42 | 3.28 ± 0.75 | 362.8 ± 17.59 | 281.2 ± 75.3 |
|
| 3.85 ± 0.54§* | 247.2 ± 62.54§** | |||
|
|
| 1.01 ± 0.21 | 1.66 ± 0.74†** | 819.7 ± 84.05 | 440.8 ± 247.6†* |
|
| 2.08 ± 0.66§** | 356.7 ± 183.4§** | |||
|
|
| 0.95 ± 0.35 | 1.59 ± 0.56†** | 1046 ± 115.1 | 798.5 ± 243.2†**‡** |
|
| 1.95 ± 0.24§** | 637.6 ± 148.4§** | |||
EpCAM gene expression is expressed as ΔCt mean ± SD, where ΔCt = Ct value of EpCAM - Ct value of β-actin; a smaller ΔCt value corresponds to a higher gene expression level.
EpCAM protein expression is expressed as mean ± SD.
The data were analyzed using Student’s t-test for comparing 2 groups and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for comparing the three studied groups.
†Significant difference from the control group.
‡Significant difference from the HCV group.
§Significant difference from GG within the same group.
*Significant at P < 0.05.
**Significant at P < 0.0001.
Figure 3A Sanger sequencing chromatogram depicting EpCAM -935 C/G variants (created by ABI Genetic Analyzer).