| Literature DB >> 35070815 |
Yin Celeste Cheuk1,2, Pingbao Zhang1,2, Shihao Xu1,2, Jiyan Wang1,2, Tian Chen1,2, Yongxin Mao3, Yamei Jiang1,2, Yongsheng Luo1,2, Jingjing Guo1,2, Weixi Wang4, Ruiming Rong1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that macrophages are significantly involved in different renal diseases. However, the role of these renal infiltrating macrophages has not been entirely uncovered. To further clarify the underlying mechanism and identify therapeutic targets, a bioinformatic analysis based on transcriptome profiles was performed.Entities:
Keywords: Macrophage; bioinformatics analysis; renal disease; signaling pathways
Year: 2021 PMID: 35070815 PMCID: PMC8749068 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Androl Urol ISSN: 2223-4683
Figure 1The characteristic and pathways of macrophages involved in murine systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of the separation between the group of samples taken in the early-stage lupus (the young mac group), the group of samples taken during lupus nephritis (the sick mac group) and the group of samples taken after induction of remission (the rem mac group); (B) volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the young mac group and sick mac group and between the sick mac group and rem group (P<0.05 and |logFC| >1); (C) the enriched biological process terms of the DEGs as identified via Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation; (D) the enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway terms of the DEGs; (E) gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to identify significantly enriched pathways.
Figure 2The characteristic and pathways of macrophages involved in murine renal crystal formation. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of the separation between the group of wild-type renal macrophages treated with GOX injection for 6 days (the wild-type group) and the group of op/op (CSF-1-deficient) renal macrophage treated with glyoxylate (GOX) injection for 6 days (the op/op group); (B) volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the wild-type group and the op/op group (P<0.05 and |logFC| >1); (C) the enriched biological process terms of the DEGs as identified via Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation; (D) the enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway terms of the DEGs; (E) gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to identify significantly enriched pathways.
Figure 3The characteristic and pathways of macrophages involved in murine renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of the separation between the sham surgery (sham) group, the group of samples taken 4 h postperfusion after IRI (the 4 h group), the group of samples taken 24 h postperfusion after IRI (the 1-day group) and the group of samples taken 9 days postperfusion after IRI (the 9-day group); (B) volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the 1-day group and sham group (P<0.05 and |logFC| >1); (C) the enriched biological process terms of the DEGs as identified via Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation; (D) the enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway terms of the DEGs; (E) gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to identify significantly enriched pathways; (F) the Venn diagram represents common and unique pathways that were significantly altered in different datasets.