| Literature DB >> 35070529 |
Luxhman Gunaseelan1, Manasvi S Vanama2, Farwa Abdi3, Aljeena Qureshi4, Ayesha Siddiqua5, Muhammad A Hamid6.
Abstract
Yoga has been shown to play a role in reducing the symptoms associated with the inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive forms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The medical history and clinical findings for a nine-year-old patient presenting with difficulty paying attention and impulsive speech and actions at home and school are presented. After the diagnosis of combination type ADHD by assessment of DSM-5 criteria, both at home and school and through parent and teacher evaluations using National Institute for Children's Health Quality (NICHQ) Vanderbilt Assessment Scales, the patient initiated a yoga training regimen. Six months after initiating the yoga training regimen, follow-up parent and teacher questionnaires revealed improvement in both the inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms. Literature sourced from the PubMed database to explore the efficacy of yoga for ADHD was used to support the research hypothesis that a structured yoga training regimen improves the symptoms associated with the inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive forms of ADHD, and thus, yoga is recommended as a management technique for individuals with ADHD.Entities:
Keywords: alternative; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (adhd); meditation; mindfulness; mind–body; pediatric; therapy; yoga
Year: 2021 PMID: 35070529 PMCID: PMC8760933 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Summary of daily yoga intervention for the management of ADHD.
| Program Sets | Meditation (10 minutes) | Asanas performed (40 minutes) | Pranayama (10 minutes) |
| 1 | Eagle, Frog, Fish, Crocodile, Tortoise, Dragonfly, Camel, Lion, and end with Child’s Pose | Breathing techniques: Kapalbathi, Anuloma Viloma, Bhastrika | |
| 2 | Tree pose, Scorpion, Blue Whale, Pigeon, Tortoise, Lion, Cobra, Corpse Pose. | ||
| 3 | Eagle, Tree, Scorpion, Fish, Pigeon, Crocodile, Dragonfly, Cobra, Child's pose |
The benefits of each asana
| Characteristic | Asana/Posture | Benefits |
| Concentration | The Eagle | Balances posture, develops concentration and focus, nurtures determination and inner conviction, improves attention span, calms the mind, improves the eye muscles |
| The Frog | Gives a quick boost of energy, helps “let off some steam” | |
| The Child’s Pose | Settles the learner when feeling hyperactive or overtired, restores energy, calms the mind, and can help induce sleep | |
| Tree Pose | Standing poses where concentration is needed to stand completely | |
| The Scorpion | Aids concentration and balance, boosts confidence | |
| Aggression | The Fish | Improves posture and chases away negative feelings |
| The Crocodile | Strengthens the back and gives energy, helps to release anger and aggression | |
| The Blue Whale | Provides a little “lift”, calms one down | |
| The Pigeon | Helps to calm an agitated mind | |
| Anxiety | The Tortoise | Helps one imagine being protected by a strong shell, helps one feel safe and quiet |
| The Dragonfly | Helps to develop patience and emotional stability, induces feelings of emotional calm and quiet before going to bed | |
| The Corpse Pose | A deep relaxation exercise that can keep the learner relaxed and centred | |
| Self-Esteem | The Camel | Helps to correct poor or lazy posture, helps all learners to stand tall and feel proud of who they are |
| The lion | Energizes the body and mind, builds self-confidence and improve communication skills, helps with anxiety | |
| The Cobra | Keeps the spine supple and healthy, tones the nerves to improve communication between the brain and body, helps the learner feel strong and powerful |
Summary of NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment scored by the participant’s teacher at baseline.
NICHQ - National Institute for Children’s Health Quality
| NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scale Summary - Teacher Informant | Teacher Score |
| Total number of questions scores 2 or 3 in questions 1-9 | 8 |
| Total number of questions scores 2 or 3 in questions 10-18 | 9 |
| Total symptom score for questions 1-18 | 44 |
| Total number of questions scores 2 or 3 in questions 19-28 | 0 |
| Total number of questions scores 2 or 3 in questions 29-35 | 0 |
| Total number of questions scores 2 or 3 in questions 36-43 | 7 |
| Average Performance Score | 4.25 |
Summary of NICHQ Vanderbilt Follow-up Assessment scored by the participant’s teacher.
NICHQ - National Institute for Children’s Health Quality
| NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scale Summary - Teacher Informant- Follow Up | Teacher Score |
| Total symptom score for questions 1-18 | 27 |
| Average Performance Score | 3.25 |
Summary of NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment scored by the participant’s parents at baseline.
NICHQ - National Institute for Children’s Health Quality
| NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scale Summary - Parent Informant | Parent Score |
| Total number of questions scored 2 or 3 in questions 1-9 | 9 |
| Total number of questions scores 2 or 3 in questions 10-18 | 9 |
| Total symptom score for questions 1-18 | 45 |
| Total number of questions scores 2 or 3 in questions 19-26 | 0 |
| Total number of questions scores 2 or 3 in questions 27-40 | 0 |
| Total number of questions scores 2 or 3 in questions 41-47 | 0 |
| Total number of questions scores 4 or 5 in questions 48-55 | 7 |
| Average Performance Score | 4.5 |
Summary of NICHQ Vanderbilt Follow-up Assessment scored by the participant’s parents.
NICHQ - National Institute for Children’s Health Quality
| NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scale Summary - Parent Informant- Follow Up | Parent Score |
| Total symptom score for questions 1-18 | 35 |
| Average Performance Score | 3.6 |
Summary of literature review.
| Authors | Study Design | Participant Characteristics | Intervention | Results |
| Mehta et al., 2011 | A school-based open-label exploratory study | n = 55 (Teacher assessments) | Duration: twice a week for 12 months. | Baseline Parent: median = 9, range = 4–20 |
| n=49/55 (Parent assessments) | Baseline Teacher: median = 13, range = 7–21 | |||
| Ages: 6-11 | Teacher’s 6-week follow-up: median = 4, range = 1–9 (P < 0.0001 Wilcoxon signed rank test). | |||
| ADHD types: 67.1% combined; 21.4% inattentive; 11.4% hyperactive/impulsive | Intervention: It is a peer-mediated interventional program consisting of yoga, meditation and play therapy maintained by trained high school student volunteers | Parent’s 5-week follow-up: median = 6, range 2–18 (P < 0.001 Wilcoxon signed rank test) | ||
| Assessment methods: Parent and Teacher Vanderbilt Questionnaires were used | Parent’s 6-month follow up: median = 5, range = 0–18 (P < 0.001 Wilcoxon signed rank test) | |||
| Teacher’s 1 year follow-up: median = 0.5, range = 0–14 (P < 0.0001 Wilcoxon signed rank test) | ||||
| Beart & Lessing, 2013 | Exploratory study Qualitative semi-structured interviews | N = 10 n=8 taking Ritalin (6) or Concerta (2) And n=2 taking no medication | Duration: 6 weeks, twice a week for 40-minute sessions | Qualitative results: “Less aggressive”, “improved self-esteem”, “more confident”, “calmer behaviour”, “improved concentration” etc. |
| Age: 9 years old (n=7) And 10 years old (n=3) | Assessment methods: Children’s Apperception Test (CAT), the Lawrence Self-Esteem Questionnaire (LAWSEQ), Parent and Teacher interviews | Overall: the yoga intervention appeared to have had a positive effect on all participants, to varying degrees. | ||
| Harrison et al., 2004 | An open trial treatment program | N = 48 | Duration: 6-week programme for twice-weekly 90 minute sessions | Baseline ADHD symptoms were moderately high, M = 22.65, and varied across the 48 participants (SD = 4.36; range: 15–30). |
| n= 31 receiving medication | Intervention: Non-drug adjunctive intervention using Sahaja Yoga Meditation | Post treatment ADHD symptoms: SD = 4.91, range 0–19 (35% improvement) (t = 8.23, p < .001) | ||
| n=14 receiving no medication | Assessment Methods: Biobehavioural Indicators of Self-Esteem questionnaire, An abbreviated version of Burnett’s (1994) 40-item self-evaluation and self-description measure, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Third edition (PPVT-III), and child interviews | No medication (n=6) Mean score reduction after 6 weeks = 7.83, S.D. = 5.15 | ||
| n=3 unknown medical information | Medication (n=20) Mean score reduction after 6 weeks = 7.95, S.D. = 4.97 | |||
| Age: 4-12 | Medication vs. no medication statistically not significant | |||
| Reduced dosage (n=11) Mean score reduction after 6 weeks = 10.18, S.D. = 4.79 | ||||
| No change of dosage (n=9) Mean score reduction after 6 weeks = 5.22, S.D. = 3.83 | ||||
| Change in dosage vs. no change t = 2.51, p<0.02 | ||||
| Varambally et al., 2013 | A hospital-based open-label exploratory study | N = 9 | Duration: at least 8 days, six 1-hour sessions, monthly follow up for 3 months | The reduction was statistically significant for scores between baseline and discharge |
| Age: 6-13 | Intervention: The yoga program consisted of Sukṣmavyayāma (loosening exercises), Yogāsana (physical postures), Prāṇāyāma (breathing exercises) and meditation in the form of Nādānusandhāna (OM chanting) | P=0.014 on CARS | ||
| Assessment Methods: ADHD rating scale-IV (ADHD-RS), Conners' abbreviated rating scale (CARS), and clinical global impression (CGI) Severity | P=0.021 on ADHD-RS | |||
| P=0.004 on CGI | ||||
| There was no significant reduction in the scores during the follow-up. By the third month, scores were returning to baseline. | ||||
| Cohen et al., 2018 | Randomized waitlist-controlled trial | n = 23 | Duration: Total 12 weeks (both groups) | At the 6 week follow up: Group 1 had faster reaction times on the KiTAP task (p = 0.01, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2371.1 to 259.1, d = 21.7) than Group 2. |
| Group 1 had fewer distractibility errors of omission (p = 0.009, 95% CI, 214.2 to 22.3, d = 21.5) than Group 2 | ||||
| Group 1 had more commission errors (p = 0.02, 95% CI, 1.4–14.8, d = 1.3) than Group 2 | ||||
| Group 1: n=12 (practiced yoga first) | Intervention: home- and school-based children's yoga intervention. | Children in Group 1 with more severe symptoms at baseline showed improvement versus control on parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) hyperactivity-inattention (b=22.1, p = 0.04, 95% CI, 24.0 to 20.1) | ||
| Children in Group 1 with more severe symptoms at baseline showed improvement versus control on inattention on the ADHD Rating Scale (b=24.4, p = 0.02, 95% CI, 27.9 to 20.9). | ||||
| Group 2: n=11 (practiced yoga second) | Assessment Methods: ADHD RS-IV Preschool Version18, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire19 (SDQ), Kinder Test of Attentional Performance (KiTAP), and heart rate variability (HRV) as a physiologic index of self-regulation. | HRV measures did not differ between groups. | ||
| Age: 3-5 |