Literature DB >> 35070393

Specific genomic alterations and prognostic analysis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Yuanwen Zheng1,2, Yejun Qin3, Wei Gong1, Hongguang Li1, Bin Li4, Yu Wang5, Baoting Chao2, Shulei Zhao4, Luguang Liu6, Shuzhan Yao7, Junping Shi8, Xiaoliang Shi8, Kai Wang8, Shifeng Xu1,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), which consists of intrahepatic CCA (iCCA), perihilar CCA (pCCA), and distal CCA (dCCA), is an aggressive malignancy worldwide. PCCA and dCCA are often classified as extrahepatic CCA (exCCA). However, the differences in mutational characteristics between pCCA and dCCA remain unclear.
METHODS: Deep sequencing targeting of 450 cancer genes was performed for genomic alteration detection. The tumor mutational burden (TMB) was measured by an algorithm developed in-house. Correlation analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: FGFR2 and ERBB2 mutations mainly occurred in iCCA and exCCA, respectively. In exCCA, the frequencies of PIK3CA, FAT4, KDM6A, MDM2, and TCF7L2 mutations were significantly higher in pCCA compared to dCCA, while the frequencies of TP53 and KRAS mutations were markedly lower in pCCA than those in dCCA. The prognosis-related mutations were different among the CCA subtypes. NF1 mutation was associated with short disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and ERBB2 mutation was associated with short DFS in dCCA patients. Meanwhile, MAP2K4 mutation was associated with long DFS and OS, and TERT mutation was associated with short DFS in pCCA. A series of mutations in genes, including ARID1A, ARID2, SMAD4, TERT, TP53, and KRAS, were found to be associated with the TMB.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we investigated the comprehensive genomic characterizations of CCA patients, identified the significant alterations in each subtype, and identified potential biomarkers for prognosis prediction. These results provide molecular evidence for the heterogeneity of CCA subtypes and evidence for further precision targeted therapy of CCA patients. 2021 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCA subtype; biomarker; next-generation sequencing (NGS); prognosis; tumor mutational burden (TMB)

Year:  2021        PMID: 35070393      PMCID: PMC8748027          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  32 in total

1.  Tumor suppressor properties of the splicing regulatory factor RBM10.

Authors:  Jordi Hernández; Elias Bechara; Doerte Schlesinger; Javier Delgado; Luis Serrano; Juan Valcárcel
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Farin Kamangar; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Michael A Choti; Charles J Yeo; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Next-generation sequencing-guided molecular-targeted therapy and immunotherapy for biliary tract cancers.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Junping Shi; Yingying Wang; Hongyuan Zhou; Zewu Zhang; Zhiqiang Han; Guanghao Li; Bo Yang; Guangtai Cao; Yan Ke; Ti Zhang; Tianqiang Song
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  KRAS mutation is predictive of outcome in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma.

Authors:  Mitra Mehrad; Somak Roy; William A LaFramboise; Patti Petrosko; Caitlyn Miller; Pimpin Incharoen; Sanja Dacic
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  Current status of liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nicolás Goldaracena; Andre Gorgen; Gonzalo Sapisochin
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  The frequency of KRAS and BRAF mutations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and their correlation with clinical outcome.

Authors:  Scott Robertson; Omar Hyder; Rebecca Dodson; Suresh K Nayar; Justin Poling; Katie Beierl; James R Eshleman; Ming-Tseh Lin; Timothy M Pawlik; Robert A Anders
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Molecular profiling of biliary cancers reveals distinct molecular alterations and potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Benjamin A Weinberg; Joanne Xiu; Michael R Lindberg; Anthony F Shields; Jimmy J Hwang; Kelsey Poorman; Mohamed E Salem; Michael J Pishvaian; Randall F Holcombe; John L Marshall; Michael A Morse
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08

8.  Tumor mutational and indel burden: a systematic pan-cancer evaluation as prognostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Hao-Xiang Wu; Zi-Xian Wang; Qi Zhao; Dong-Liang Chen; Ming-Ming He; Lu-Ping Yang; Ying-Nan Wang; Ying Jin; Chao Ren; Hui-Yan Luo; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Feng Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

9.  SMAD4 alteration associates with invasive-front pathological markers and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hidehito Oyanagi; Yoshifumi Shimada; Masayuki Nagahashi; Hiroshi Ichikawa; Yosuke Tajima; Kaoru Abe; Masato Nakano; Hitoshi Kameyama; Yasumasa Takii; Takashi Kawasaki; Kei-Ichi Homma; Yiwei Ling; Shujiro Okuda; Kazuaki Takabe; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Mutational spectrum and precision oncology for biliary tract carcinoma.

Authors:  Jianzhen Lin; Yinghao Cao; Xu Yang; Guangyu Li; Yang Shi; Dongxu Wang; Junyu Long; Yang Song; Jinzhu Mao; Fucun Xie; Yi Bai; Lei Zhang; Xiaobo Yang; Xueshuai Wan; Anqiang Wang; Mei Guan; Lin Zhao; Ke Hu; Jie Pan; Li Huo; Xin Lu; Yilei Mao; Xinting Sang; Henghui Zhang; Kai Wang; Xiaoyue Wang; Haitao Zhao
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 11.556

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Treatment of Distal Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Leva Gorji; Eliza W Beal
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.109

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.