Literature DB >> 35064820

No statistical evidence that honey bees competitively reduced wild bee abundance in the Munich Botanic Garden-a comment on Renner et al. (2021).

Lawrence D Harder1, Ronald M Miksha2.   

Abstract

In a recent paper, Renner et al. (Oecologia 195:825-831, 2021) concluded, without supporting statistical evidence, that increased density of managed honey-bee hives between 2019 and 2020 intensified competitive effects of honey bees on non-Apis bee species in the Munich Botanic Garden. Analysis of Renner et al.'s observations revealed that, contrary to their assumption, the change in hive numbers did not statistically alter honey-bee visitation to 29 plant species within or between years. Given this consistency, changes in the proportion of non-Apis bees among visitors of the surveyed plant species between years likely represent their responses to reduced overall availability of floral resources during 2020. Thus, Renner et al.'s observations do not provide convincing evidence that honey bees competitively reduced the abundance of non-Apis bees in the Munich Botanic Garden.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; Competition; Honey bee; Urban; Wild bees

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35064820     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05112-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Changes in the bee fauna of a German botanical garden between 1997 and 2017, attributable to climate warming, not other parameters.

Authors:  Michaela M Hofmann; Andreas Fleischmann; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Native pollen thieves reduce the reproductive success of a hermaphroditic plant, Aloe maculata.

Authors:  Anna L Hargreaves; Lawrence D Harder; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 3.  Do managed bees have negative effects on wild bees?: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Rachel E Mallinger; Hannah R Gaines-Day; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Controlling the impact of the managed honeybee on wild bees in protected areas.

Authors:  Mickaël Henry; Guy Rodet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.

Authors:  Lise Ropars; Isabelle Dajoz; Colin Fontaine; Audrey Muratet; Benoît Geslin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  High honeybee abundances reduce wild bee abundances on flowers in the city of Munich.

Authors:  Susanne S Renner; Marie Sophie Graf; Zoe Hentschel; Helen Krause; Andreas Fleischmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Statistical evidence that honeybees competitively reduced wild bee abundance in the Munich Botanic Garden in 2020 compared to 2019.

Authors:  Susanne S Renner; A Fleischmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.