Literature DB >> 29536162

Changes in the bee fauna of a German botanical garden between 1997 and 2017, attributable to climate warming, not other parameters.

Michaela M Hofmann1, Andreas Fleischmann2, Susanne S Renner3.   

Abstract

Botanical gardens represent artificial, but stable environments. With this premise, we analyzed the Munich Botanical Garden's bee fauna in 1997/1999 and again in 2015/2017. The garden covers 20 ha, uses no bee-relevant insecticides, has a protected layout, and on three sides abuts protected areas. Outdoors, it cultivates some 10,871 species/subspecies, many suitable as pollen and nectar sources for bees. The first survey found 79 species, the second 106, or 55% of the 192 species recorded for Munich since 1990. A Jackknife estimate for the second survey suggests 115 expected species. Classifying bees according to their thermal preferences (warm habitats, cool habitats, broad preferences, or unknown) revealed that 15 warm-loving species were gained (newly found), two lost (no longer found), and 12 retained, but only one cool-loving species was gained, three lost, and none retained, which multinomial models show to be significant differences. Of the 62 retained species, 27 changed in abundance, with 18 less frequent and nine more frequent by 2017 than they had been in 1997/1999. Retention, gain, or loss were unconnected to pollen specialization and Red List status of bee species. Between 1997 and 2017, average temperatures in Munich have increased by 0.5 °C, and climate warming over the past century is the most plausible explanation for the directional increase in warm-loving and the decrease in cool-adapted species. These results highlight the potential of botanic gardens with their artificially diverse and near-pesticide-free floras as systems in which to investigate climate change per se as a possible factor in shifting insect diversity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bee fauna; Botanic gardens; Climate warming; Insect faunal change; Repeated monitoring; Stable habitat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29536162     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-018-4110-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

Review 1.  Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers.

Authors:  Dave Goulson; Elizabeth Nicholls; Cristina Botías; Ellen L Rotheray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The role of botanical gardens in climate change research.

Authors:  Richard B Primack; Abraham J Miller-Rushing
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  Decline and conservation of bumble bees.

Authors:  D Goulson; G C Lye; B Darvill
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 4.  Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers.

Authors:  Simon G Potts; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Claire Kremen; Peter Neumann; Oliver Schweiger; William E Kunin
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  DNA barcoding largely supports 250 years of classical taxonomy: identifications for Central European bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea partim).

Authors:  Stefan Schmidt; Christian Schmid-Egger; Jérôme Morinière; Gerhard Haszprunar; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Common garden comparison of the leaf-out phenology of woody species from different native climates, combined with herbarium records, forecasts long-term change.

Authors:  Constantin M Zohner; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  The city as a refuge for insect pollinators.

Authors:  Damon M Hall; Gerardo R Camilo; Rebecca K Tonietto; Jeff Ollerton; Karin Ahrné; Mike Arduser; John S Ascher; Katherine C R Baldock; Robert Fowler; Gordon Frankie; Dave Goulson; Bengt Gunnarsson; Mick E Hanley; Janet I Jackson; Gail Langellotto; David Lowenstein; Emily S Minor; Stacy M Philpott; Simon G Potts; Muzafar H Sirohi; Edward M Spevak; Graham N Stone; Caragh G Threlfall
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas.

Authors:  Caspar A Hallmann; Martin Sorg; Eelke Jongejans; Henk Siepel; Nick Hofland; Heinz Schwan; Werner Stenmans; Andreas Müller; Hubert Sumser; Thomas Hörren; Dave Goulson; Hans de Kroon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Gradual replacement of wild bees by honeybees in flowers of the Mediterranean Basin over the last 50 years.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Narrow habitat breadth and late-summer emergence increases extinction vulnerability in Central European bees.

Authors:  Michaela M Hofmann; Constantin M Zohner; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  No statistical evidence that honey bees competitively reduced wild bee abundance in the Munich Botanic Garden-a comment on Renner et al. (2021).

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Ronald M Miksha
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.