Literature DB >> 23601614

An intervention to decrease adolescent indoor tanning: a multi-method pilot study.

DeAnn Lazovich1, Kelvin Choi, Cheri Rolnick, Jody M Jackson, Jean Forster, Brian Southwell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Indoor tanning usually begins during adolescence, but few strategies exist to discourage adolescent use. We developed and tested a parent-teenager intervention to decrease indoor tanning use.
METHODS: Through focus groups, we identified key messages to enhance parent-teenager communication about indoor tanning, and then developed a pamphlet for parents and postcards for adolescents to use in a direct mail experiment with randomly selected households. Two weeks after the mailing, we asked intervention parents (n = 87) and adolescents (n = 69) and nonintervention parents (n = 31) and adolescents (n = 28) about intervention receipt and content recall, parental concern, monitoring, parent-teenager conversations, and indoor tanning intention.
RESULTS: In intervention households, 54% of mothers and 56% of girls recalled receipt and reported reading materials, but few boys and no fathers did. Among mothers, 57% in intervention households indicated concern about daughters' indoor tanning, and 25% would allow daughters to tan indoors, whereas 43% of nonintervention mothers had concerns and 46% would allow indoor tanning. Fewer girls in intervention households than in nonintervention households thought parents would allow indoor tanning (44% vs. 65%), and fewer intended to tan indoors (36% vs. 60%). Most mothers and daughters who read the intervention materials also reported discussions about indoor tanning. Moreover, the less likely girls were to think that their mothers would allow indoor tanning, the less likely it was that they intended to tan indoors, a relationship mediated by perceptions of maternal monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS: A systematic qualitative and quantitative research approach yielded well-received indoor tanning prevention messages for mothers and female adolescents. Enhancing maternal monitoring has potential to decrease adolescent indoor tanning.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23601614      PMCID: PMC3734796          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  31 in total

1.  Maternal/female caregiver influences on adolescent indoor tanning.

Authors:  Jo Ellen Stryker; Deann Lazovich; Jean L Forster; Karen M Emmons; Glorian Sorensen; Marie-France Demierre
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure.

Authors:  Sara Gandini; Francesco Sera; Maria Sofia Cattaruzza; Paolo Pasquini; Orietta Picconi; Peter Boyle; Carmelo Francesco Melchi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Prevalence of indoor tanning use in Minnesota, 2002.

Authors:  Deann Lazovich; Carol Sweeney; Jean Forster
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2005-04

Review 4.  The protective effects of good parenting on adolescents.

Authors:  Elise R DeVore; Kenneth R Ginsburg
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 5.  Indoor tanning by adolescents: prevalence, practices and policies.

Authors:  DeAnn Lazovich; Jean Forster
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States.

Authors:  J P Pierce; W S Choi; E A Gilpin; A J Farkas; R K Merritt
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Use of indoor tanning sunlamps by US youth, ages 11-18 years, and by their parent or guardian caregivers: prevalence and correlates.

Authors:  Vilma E Cokkinides; Martin A Weinstock; Mary C O'Connell; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Examination of the short-term efficacy of a parent-based intervention to prevent skin cancer.

Authors:  Rob Turrisi; Joel Hillhouse; Sarah Heavin; June Robinson; Malissa Adams; Jessica Berry
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-08

9.  Characteristics associated with use or intention to use indoor tanning among adolescents.

Authors:  DeAnn Lazovich; Jean Forster; Glorian Sorensen; Karen Emmons; Jo Stryker; Marie-France Demierre; Andrea Hickle; Natania Remba
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2004-09

10.  Lifetime history of indoor tanning in young people: a retrospective assessment of initiation, persistence, and correlates.

Authors:  Karen Lostritto; Leah M Ferrucci; Brenda Cartmel; David J Leffell; Annette M Molinaro; Allen E Bale; Susan T Mayne
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Review of interventions to reduce ultraviolet tanning: Need for treatments targeting excessive tanning, an emerging addictive behavior.

Authors:  Jerod L Stapleton; Joel Hillhouse; Kristine Levonyan-Radloff; Sharon L Manne
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2017-06-22

2.  Teen Daughters and Their Mothers in Conversation: Identifying Opportunities for Enhancing Awareness of Risky Tanning Behaviors.

Authors:  Mallorie Gordon; Vivian M Rodríguez; Elyse Shuk; Maria Schoenhammer; Allan C Halpern; Alan C Geller; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Sociocultural experiences, body image, and indoor tanning among young adult women.

Authors:  Jerod L Stapleton; Sharon L Manne; Kathryn Greene; Katie Darabos; Amanda Carpenter; Shawna V Hudson; Elliot J Coups
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-29

4.  Parental Support for Age-based Indoor Tanning Restrictions.

Authors:  Melissa B Gilkey; Darren Mays; Maryam M Asgari; Melanie L Kornides; Annie-Laurie McRee
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Randomized controlled trial of a web-based indoor tanning intervention: Acceptability and preliminary outcomes.

Authors:  Jerod L Stapleton; Sharon L Manne; Katie Darabos; Kathryn Greene; Anne E Ray; Amber L Turner; Elliot J Coups
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Strategies to reduce indoor tanning: current research gaps and future opportunities for prevention.

Authors:  Dawn M Holman; Kathleen A Fox; Jeffrey D Glenn; Gery P Guy; Meg Watson; Katie Baker; Vilma Cokkinides; Mark Gottlieb; DeAnn Lazovich; Frank M Perna; Blake P Sampson; Andrew B Seidenberg; Craig Sinclair; Alan C Geller
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Turning disciplinary knowledge into solutions.

Authors:  Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Cancer prevention for the next generation.

Authors:  Mary C White; Lucy A Peipins; Meg Watson; Katrina F Trivers; Dawn M Holman; Juan L Rodriguez
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  A Web-Based Intervention to Reduce Indoor Tanning Motivations in Adolescents: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joel Hillhouse; Rob Turrisi; Nichole M Scaglione; Michael J Cleveland; Katie Baker; L Carter Florence
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2017-02

10.  Results of a social media campaign to prevent indoor tanning by teens: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David B Buller; Sherry Pagoto; Katie Baker; Barbara J Walkosz; Joel Hillhouse; Kimberly L Henry; Julia Berteletti; Jessica Bibeau
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.