Literature DB >> 17368987

The cognitive auditory cortex: task-specificity of stimulus representations.

Henning Scheich1, André Brechmann, Michael Brosch, Eike Budinger, Frank W Ohl.   

Abstract

Auditory cortex (AC), like subcortical auditory nuclei, represents properties of auditory stimuli by spatiotemporal activation patterns across neurons. A tacit assumption of AC research has been that the multiplicity of functional maps in primary and secondary areas serves a refined continuation of subcortical stimulus processing, i.e. a parallel orderly analysis of distinct properties of a complex sound. This view, which was mainly derived from exposure to parametric sound variation, may not fully capture the essence of cortical processing. Neocortex, in spite of its parcellation into diverse sensory, motor, associative, and cognitive areas, exhibits a rather stereotyped local architecture. The columnar arrangement of the neocortex and the quantitatively dominant connectivity with numerous other cortical areas are two of its key features. This suggests that cortex has a rather common function which lies beyond those usually leading to the distinction of functional areas. We propose that task-relatedness of the way, how any information can be represented in cortex, is one general consequence of the architecture and corticocortical connectivity. Specifically, this hypothesis predicts different spatiotemporal representations of auditory stimuli when concepts and strategies how these stimuli are analysed do change. We will describe, in an exemplary fashion, cortical patterns of local field potentials in gerbil, of unit spiking activity in monkey, and of fMRI signals in human AC during the execution of different tasks mainly in the realm of category formation of sounds. We demonstrate that the representations reflect context- and memory-related, conceptual and executional aspects of a task and that they can predict the behavioural outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17368987     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  36 in total

1.  Task reward structure shapes rapid receptive field plasticity in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is my mobile ringing? Evidence for rapid processing of a personally significant sound in humans.

Authors:  Anja Roye; Erich Schröger; Thomas Jacobsen; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Auditory and visual cortex of primates: a comparison of two sensory systems.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Auditory cortex mapmaking: principles, projections, and plasticity.

Authors:  Christoph E Schreiner; Jeffery A Winer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Effect of sequential comparison on active processing of sound duration.

Authors:  Nicole Angenstein; André Brechmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Task engagement selectively modulates neural correlations in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joshua D Downer; Mamiko Niwa; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Specialization for sound localization in fields A1, DZ, and PAF of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Chen-Chung Lee; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-21

9.  Remodeling the cortex in memory: Increased use of a learning strategy increases the representational area of relevant acoustic cues.

Authors:  Kasia M Bieszczad; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Learning strategy refinement reverses early sensory cortical map expansion but not behavior: Support for a theory of directed cortical substrates of learning and memory.

Authors:  Gabriel A Elias; Kasia M Bieszczad; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.