Literature DB >> 22766983

Impact of complete cytoreduction leaving no gross residual disease associated with radical cytoreductive surgical procedures on survival in advanced ovarian cancer.

Suk-Joon Chang1, Robert E Bristow, Hee-Sug Ryu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze the impact of radical cytoreductive surgery-as part of primary tumor debulking-on the amount of residual tumor and survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and to evaluate the prognostic significance of no gross residual disease (RD) after surgery.
METHODS: Medical records of 203 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer were reviewed. All patients underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy. Various clinicopathologic characteristics were collected.
RESULTS: Of 203 patients, 119 patients underwent simple surgery, while radical surgery was performed in 84 patients. Advanced age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.06, P < 0.01), FIGO stage IV disease (HR 3.61, 95 % CI 1.48-8.83, P < 0.01), and grossly visible RD (HR 3.24, 95 % CI 1.90-5.53, P < 0.01) were identified as significant factors associated with poor prognosis in the entire cohort of 203 patients. Radical surgery (HR 0.56, 95 % CI 0.37-0.87, P = 0.01) was associated with improved survival. In the subgroup of patients with stage IIIC disease with peritoneal carcinomatosis, independent prognostic factors were advanced age (HR 1.04, 95 % CI 1.01-1.06, P = 0.01), radical surgery (HR 0.58, 95 % CI 0.35-0.96, P = 0.03), and grossly visible RD (HR 2.86, 95 % CI 1.55-5.30, P < 0.01). Patients with no gross RD had the longest overall survival (86 months) compared with RD 0.1-1 cm (46 months) and RD >1.0 cm (37 months) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: No gross RD is associated with improved overall survival, and radical surgery was effective for achieving no gross RD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22766983     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2446-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  58 in total

1.  Racial disparities and patterns of ovarian cancer surgical care in California.

Authors:  F W Liu; L M Randall; K S Tewari; R E Bristow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Molecular biomarkers of residual disease after surgical debulking of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Susan L Tucker; Kshipra Gharpure; Shelley M Herbrich; Anna K Unruh; Alpa M Nick; Erin K Crane; Robert L Coleman; Jamie Guenthoer; Heather J Dalton; Sherry Y Wu; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Bulent Ozpolat; Cristina Ivan; Wei Hu; Keith A Baggerly; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  The optimal time for surgery in women with serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jocelyn M Stewart; Alicia A Tone; Haiyan Jiang; Marcus Q Bernardini; Sarah Ferguson; Stephane Laframboise; K Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen; Taymaa May
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Enhancing delivery of small molecule and cell-based therapies for ovarian cancer using advanced delivery strategies.

Authors:  Joanne O'Dwyer; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Robert Wylie; Saoirse O'Mahony; Michael O'Dwyer; Garry P Duffy; Eimear B Dolan
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2020-08-16

Review 5.  Appropriate Recommendations for Surgical Debulking in Stage IV Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jing-Yi Chern; John P Curtin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01

Review 6.  Ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ursula A Matulonis; Anil K Sood; Lesley Fallowfield; Brooke E Howitt; Jalid Sehouli; Beth Y Karlan
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 52.329

7.  Correlation between Surgeon's assessment and radiographic evaluation of residual disease in women with advanced stage ovarian cancer reported to have undergone optimal surgical cytoreduction: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Ramez N Eskander; James Kauderer; Krishnansu S Tewari; Robert S Mannel; Robert E Bristow; David M O'Malley; Stephen C Rubin; Gretchen E Glaser; Chad A Hamilton; Keiichi Fujiwara; Warner K Huh; Frederick Ueland; Jean-Marie Stephan; Robert A Burger
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Advanced ovarian cancer: what should be the standard of care?

Authors:  Barbara A Goff
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  A multicenter prospective trial evaluating the ability of preoperative computed tomography scan and serum CA-125 to predict suboptimal cytoreduction at primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Pedro T Ramirez; Debra M Sarasohn; Jerrold B Teitcher; Svetlana Mironov; Revathy B Iyer; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Harold Paul; Masayoshi Hosaka; Carol A Aghajanian; Mario M Leitao; Ginger J Gardner; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Hedvig Hricak; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Epithelial ovarian cancer: the molecular genetics of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J Krzystyniak; L Ceppi; D S Dizon; M J Birrer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.