| Literature DB >> 35062534 |
Prabhjot Kaur1, Shilpi Harnal1, Rajeev Tiwari2, Shuchi Upadhyay3, Surbhi Bhatia4, Arwa Mashat5, Aliaa M Alabdali5.
Abstract
Agriculture is crucial to the economic prosperity and development of India. Plant diseases can have a devastating influence towards food safety and a considerable loss in the production of agricultural products. Disease identification on the plant is essential for long-term agriculture sustainability. Manually monitoring plant diseases is difficult due to time limitations and the diversity of diseases. In the realm of agricultural inputs, automatic characterization of plant diseases is widely required. Based on performance out of all image-processing methods, is better suited for solving this task. This work investigates plant diseases in grapevines. Leaf blight, Black rot, stable, and Black measles are the four types of diseases found in grape plants. Several earlier research proposals using machine learning algorithms were created to detect one or two diseases in grape plant leaves; no one offers a complete detection of all four diseases. The photos are taken from the plant village dataset in order to use transfer learning to retrain the EfficientNet B7 deep architecture. Following the transfer learning, the collected features are down-sampled using a Logistic Regression technique. Finally, the most discriminant traits are identified with the highest constant accuracy of 98.7% using state-of-the-art classifiers after 92 epochs. Based on the simulation findings, an appropriate classifier for this application is also suggested. The proposed technique's effectiveness is confirmed by a fair comparison to existing procedures.Entities:
Keywords: EfficientNet B7; convolutional neural network; feature reduction and extraction; image classification; leaf disease detection; plant disease; transfer learning
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062534 PMCID: PMC8779777 DOI: 10.3390/s22020575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
The result of the state-of-art models.
| Paper (Ref.) | Dataset Used | Precision | Recall | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 1619 | 80.20% | 95.2% | 98.28% |
| [ | 1350 | 85.2% | 89.2% | 98.35% |
| [ | 16,579 | 90.1% | 91.00% | 92.01% |
| [ | 1200 | 87.0% | 85.2% | 90.21% |
| [ | 1507 | 89.12% | 82.5% | 97.00% |
Figure 1Number of Training Dataset.
Description of Training, Testing Data with symptoms.
| Type | Training | Testing | Class | Symptoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black_rot | 1888 | 472 | 1 | Black spherical fruiting and brown circular lesions. |
| Black_measles | 1920 | 480 | 2 | Dark brown-black vascular streaking. |
| Healthy | 1692 | 423 | 3 | Green in color. |
| Leaf_blight | 1722 | 430 | 4 | Soaked spots on the lower surface of leaves. |
Figure 2Few samples grape leaf image dataset. (A) Black rot leaf image; (B) Black_measles leaf image; (C) Healthy leaf image; (D) Leaf_blight leaf image.
Figure 3Hy-CNN model block diagram for grape leaf disease detection and classification.
Figure 4Data Pre-processing (A) Original image, (B) 90° rotated image, (C) Vertically flipped image, (D) Horizontally flipped image, (E) Intensified image.
Model layer and parameter categorization.
| Level | Layers | Resolution | Number of Channels | Number of Layers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Convo_3 × 3 | 224 × 224 | 32 | 1 |
| 2 | MBConvo1_3 × 3 | 112 × 112 | 16 | 1 |
| 3 | MBConvo6_3 × 3 | 112 × 112 | 24 | 2 |
| 4 | MBConvo6_5 × 5 | 56 × 56 | 40 | 2 |
| 5 | MBConvo6_3 × 3 | 28 × 28 | 80 | 3 |
| 6 | MBConvo6_5 × 5 | 14 × 14 | 112 | 3 |
| 7 | MBConvo6_5 × 5 | 14 × 14 | 192 | 4 |
| 8 | MBConvo6_3 × 3 | 7 × 7 | 320 | 1 |
| 9 | Convo_1 × 1 with Pooling and FC layer | 7 × 7 | 1280 | 1 |
Figure 5Systematic diagram of EfficientNet B7 architecture for leaf disease detection.
Abbreviations used in this work.
| Notations | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Rec | “Recall Value” |
| Pre | “Precision Value” |
| F1Src | “F1 Score” |
Figure 6Re-training of proposed model.
Figure 7Accuracy Graph of Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (Hy-CNN).
Accuracy table of Training and Testing with models.
| Model Name | Number of Epochs | Training Accuracy for Each Epochs | Testing Accuracy for Each Epochs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (Hy-CNN) | 30 | 96.2% | 95.1% |
| 50 | 95.4% | 96.1% | |
| 70 | 97% | 96.5% | |
| 100 | 98.7% | 97% |
Parametric data calculation of precision, F1-Score and recall.
| CNN Network Model | Network | Precision Value | Recall | F1-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (Hy-CNN) | IC | 0.95 | 0.22 | 0.94 |
| IC | 0.95 | 0.21 | 0.94 | |
| OD | 0.97 | 1 | 0.96 | |
| OD | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 |
Comparison of Hy-CNN model with existing deep learning models.
| Ref. No. | Method | Accuracy | Plant Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | EfficientNet—CNN | 96.18% | Plant Leaf |
| [ | United Model | 98.2% | Grape Leaf |
| [ | F-CNN & S-CNN | 98.3% | Tomato Leaf |
| [ | Proposed FCNN & SCNN | 92.01% | Crop Leaf |
| [ | Hybrid Principal Component Analysis | 95.1% | Plant Leaf |
| [ | Hybris PCA & Optimization Algorithm | 90.2% | Apple Leaf |
| [ | Texture and AlexNet | 97.0% | Coffee Leaf |
| [ | Deep Learning Models | 98% | Okra Leaf |
| [ | Decision tree & Random Forest | 90% & 94% | Tomato Laef |
| [ | Deep CNN | 98% | Coffee Leaf |
| Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (Hy-CNN) | Deep Transfer EfficientNet B7 model | 98.7% | Grape Leaf |