| Literature DB >> 33169099 |
Sweta Bhattacharya1, Praveen Kumar Reddy Maddikunta1, Quoc-Viet Pham2, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu1, Siva Rama Krishnan S1, Chiranji Lal Chowdhary1, Mamoun Alazab3, Md Jalil Piran4.
Abstract
Since December 2019, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak has caused many death cases and affected all sectors of human life. With gradual progression of time, COVID-19 was declared by the world health organization (WHO) as an outbreak, which has imposed a heavy burden on almost all countries, especially ones with weaker health systems and ones with slow responses. In the field of healthcare, deep learning has been implemented in many applications, e.g., diabetic retinopathy detection, lung nodule classification, fetal localization, and thyroid diagnosis. Numerous sources of medical images (e.g., X-ray, CT, and MRI) make deep learning a great technique to combat the COVID-19 outbreak. Motivated by this fact, a large number of research works have been proposed and developed for the initial months of 2020. In this paper, we first focus on summarizing the state-of-the-art research works related to deep learning applications for COVID-19 medical image processing. Then, we provide an overview of deep learning and its applications to healthcare found in the last decade. Next, three use cases in China, Korea, and Canada are also presented to show deep learning applications for COVID-19 medical image processing. Finally, we discuss several challenges and issues related to deep learning implementations for COVID-19 medical image processing, which are expected to drive further studies in controlling the outbreak and controlling the crisis, which results in smart healthy cities.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI); Big data; COVID-19; coronavirus pandemic; deep learning; epidemic outbreak; medical image processing
Year: 2020 PMID: 33169099 PMCID: PMC7642729 DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sustain Cities Soc ISSN: 2210-6707 Impact factor: 7.587
Fig. 1Transmission of COVID-19.
Deep learning implementations in COVID-19 datasets.
| Ref. | Dataset | Methods Used | Evaluation Metrics | Research Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) image dataset | DL framework using transfer learning | Accuracy, Cross-Entropy Loss,True Positive Rate and False Positive Rate | Use of image dataset from varied sources to ensure generic usability of the proposed model not included in the study | |
| Anteroposterior Chest X-ray dataset of children (1–5 years) from Guangzhou Women and Medical Center, China | Customized CNN model- VGG16 | Accuracy, AUC, Precision, Recall, Specificity, F-Score and MCC | Random Sampling Process Used. Reliability of the model in highly non-linear locality pertaining to predictions not considered in the study | |
| CT Images from Xi’an Jiaotong University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University First Hospital, Xi’an No.8 Hospital of Xi’an Medical College | AI and DL based Framework | Accuracy, Specificity and Sensitivity | Analysis of the relationship between Hierarchical features of CT images and genetic, epidemological information not included in the study | |
| Chest CT scan Image dataset from Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center | Human-In-the-Loop Strategy, DL Based Segmentation Network - VB Net | Dice Similarity Index, Pearson CorrelationCoefficient, Time of Manual Contouring, Segmentation Accuracy | Quantification of Imaging Metrics and establishing correlation between syndromes, epdemicology and treatment responses not included in the study | |
| X-ray Images of Posterior-Anterior (PA) part of the lungs from Dr. Joseph Cohen's GitHub repository augmented with Chest X-ray Images from the Kaggle Dataset | Dropweights based Bayesian Convolutional Network | Prediction Uncertainty and Accuracy | Evaluation of the results with traditional state-of-the-art models not performed. Consideration of ‘Omics’ dataset not included for better insights on image markers | |
| X-ray Image dataset from GitHub and Cohen, Image dataset from Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiopaedia, and Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) | Transfer Learning based on CNN | Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity | More in-depth analysis using larger datasets and development of models capable of distinguishing between COVID-19 and other viral infectious diseases | |
| CT Image Dataset from Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China | Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Architecture | Opacification Percentage | A structured reasoning on the impact of COVID-19 viruses on the opacities not included | |
| X-ray Image Dataset from Dr. Joseph Cohen and Dr. Adrian Rosebrock | COVIDX-Net comprising of Deep CNN Models | Accuracy, Precision, Recall and F1-Score | More in-depth analysis on larger datasets missing | |
| X-ray Images from Dr. Joseph Cohen GitHub Repository | Deep CNN Models - ResNet50, InceptionV3 and Inception-ResNetV2 | Accuracy, ROC and Confusion Matrices | Implementation of the CNN Models on larger datasets to enhance classification performance not considered |
Fig. 2Various techniques and applications of deep learning.
Fig. 3Applications of DL in medical image processing.
Review of DL applications in medical image processing.
| Ref. | Dataset | Topic | Methods used | Research challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 chest X-ray images | Lung Nodule Classification | Artificial CNN | Texture assessment approaches to identify disease trends | |
| Lung Image Database Consortium | Lung Nodule Classification | Multi-scale CNN | The initial training and testing set strikingly different | |
| 1,12,120 X-ray images of 30,805 patients. | Pathological classification of pneumonia | CheXNet DL model | Considered F1-Score only as performance metrics | |
| Kaggle dataset | Classification for DR | CNN | System failed to learn more complex features | |
| Messidor-2 Â- ADCIS dataset | Classification for DR | CNN+ IDx-DR X2.1 | Failed to substitute CNN-trained features | |
| Private Skin dataset | Classification of skin lesions | Multi-layer CNN | Excluded use of bigger skin dataset | |
| 4298 X-ray of 1675 patients | Classification of organs | CNN | Predictions are sluggish, allowing implementation problems | |
| University of Chicago Hospital. | Localization of prostate | SSAE | Considered only 66 images of prostate | |
| DCE-MRI dataset | localize multi-organ disease | Single-Layer SSAE | Limited dataset, System failed to learn more complex features | |
| Private Dataset | Accurate response with landmark localization of the medical image | SCN Architecture | Strategies to minimize the complexity of the system are not included. | |
| 1003 pregnancy scan reports | Localize the fetal | CNN | All the performance metrics not evaluated with traditional models | |
| 869 patients, 2891 aortic valve images | Object detection | Marginal Space DL | Failed to address computational constraints | |
| 905 images, 120 patients | Detect interstitial lung disease | Deep CNN | Failed to deal with theoretical work on cross-modality statistics | |
| Kaggle dataset | Lung cancer detection | 3-D NN | Failed to detect high accuracy for small nodules | |
| Case Western Reserve University | Detection of nuclei in breast images | SSAE | Requires improvement in extraction of features | |
| 1417 skin images | Detect cancer in the skin | Softmax classifier | Excluded use of bigger skin dataset | |
| Soft Tissue Sarcoma dataset | Tumor segmentation | Deep CNN | Examined a single dataset on a single network. | |
| UK Digital Heart Project dataset | Cardiac image segmentation | CNN | Low resolution slice | |
| 226 images, 33 healthy volumes | Retinal anatomy segmentation | CNN | Requires improvement in learning process | |
| 81 prostate MR volumes | Prostate image segmentation | BOWDA-Net | Limited dataset, system failed to learn more complex features | |
| Haukeland Medical Center cancer dataset | Cancer registration | Elastix automated 3D deformable registration software | Strategies to minimize the complexity of the system are not included. | |
| Short-axis cardiac magnetic resonance data set | Cardiac registration | Multi-atlas classifier | Requires better computational capability | |
| Private MR brain image dataset | 3D-image registration | Self-supervised learning model | Findings are confined to brain scans with axial vision | |
| 27 healthy members | Detect motion-free abdominal images | CNN image registration model | Tiny dateset with minor lesions |
Fig. 4Deep learning in medical image processing to fight COVID-19 pandemic.
Fig. 5Sample X-ray and CT scan images of COVID-19 patients (Bernheim et al., 2020, Ozturk et al., 2020).
Fig. 6A fully connected CNN for COVID-19 diagnosis.
Summary of deep learning for medical image processing in COVID-19.
| Ref. | Dataset | Methods used | Evaluation metrics | Research challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chest X-ray | CNN, DarkNet, DarkCovidNet | 98.08% accuracy | Use of a limited number of COVID- 19 X-ray images | |
| OLS, ARIMA | DNN, LSTM | Average performance by 24% and 19%, respectively. | Prediction of infectious disease. | |
| CT scan Images | logistic regression model | 89.47% sensitivity, 67.42% specificity | The laboratory testing methods are not uniform among different hospitals. | |
| Electronic medical records | Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis | Hazard ratio and confidence interval was used to detect the adverse outcome | Predicting the adverse outcome at the early stage of COVID-19. | |
| CT scan images | DL-based model | 100% sensitivity, 93.55% specificity, 95.24% accuracy. | Achieving consistent results between the expert and model. | |
| chest CT exams | COVNet | 90% sensitivity, 96% specificity | Unable to categorize the disease into different severity levels. | |
| chest CT | DL | 97% sensitivity | The clinical and laboratory data were limited when regional hospitals were overloaded. | |
| CT chest images | CNN models | 0.996 AUC, 98.2% sensitivity, 92.2% specificity | Achieving fast and reliable detection of COVID-19 from chest CT datasets. | |
| CT scan | 2D Slice Analysis, 3D Volume Analysis | 98.2% sensitivity, 0.996 AUC, 92.2% specificity | Challenging to achieve high accuracy in detection of Coronavirus as well as quantification and tracking of disease burden. | |
| Chest X-ray | COVID-Net | 93.3% test accuracy | AI systems leveraging the more readily available and accessible CXR imaging modality. |