| Literature DB >> 35060480 |
Melpomeni Malamouli1,2, Itamar Levinger1,2, Andrew J McAinch1,2, Adam J Trewin3, Raymond J Rodgers1,4, Alba Moreno-Asso1,2.
Abstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder affecting pre-menopausal women and involves metabolic dysregulation. Despite the high prevalence of insulin resistance, the existence of mitochondrial dysregulation and its role in the pathogenesis of PCOS is not clear. Exercise is recommended as the first-line therapy for women with PCOS. In particular, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is known to improve metabolic health and enhance mitochondrial characteristics. In this narrative review, the existing knowledge of mitochondrial characteristics in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue of women with PCOS and the effect of exercise interventions in ameliorating metabolic and mitochondrial health in these women are discussed. Even though the evidence on mitochondrial dysfunction in PCOS is limited, some studies point to aberrant mitochondrial functions mostly in skeletal muscle, while there is very little research in adipose tissue. Although most exercise intervention studies in PCOS report improvements in metabolic health, they show diverse and inconclusive findings in relation to mitochondrial characteristics. A limitation of the current study is the lack of comprehensive mitochondrial analyses and the diversity in exercise modalities, with only one study investigating the impact of HIIT alone. Therefore, further comprehensive large-scale exercise intervention studies are required to understand the association between metabolic dysfunction and aberrant mitochondrial profile, and the molecular mechanisms underlying the exercise-induced metabolic adaptations in women with PCOS.Entities:
Keywords: exercise; insulin resistance; metabolic health; mitochondria; polycystic ovary syndrome
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35060480 PMCID: PMC8942332 DOI: 10.1530/JME-21-0177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Endocrinol ISSN: 0952-5041 Impact factor: 5.098
Figure 1Healthy mitochondria vs dysfunctional mitochondria. (A) Schematic representation of regulated functions of mitochondria including sufficient ATP synthesis, balanced levels of ROS production, biogenesis and increased fusion/fission ratio. (B) Schematic representation of the mechanisms causing dysfunctional mitochondria, including defects in activity of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes, reduced mitochondrial respiration, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, abnormalities in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number, reduced mitochondrial biogenesis and dysregulated fusion/fission ratio and mitophagy.
Studies of mitochondrial content.
| Mitochondrial content assessment | Population | Tissue | Study | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal muscle | Adipose tissue | |||
| Mitochondrial DNA copy number | 23 PCOS (9 lean and 14 obese) | ↔ | – | (Rabøl |
| Mitochondrial mass by MitoTracker Green Probe | 8 insulin-resistant PCOS | ↔ (cultured primary myotubes) | – | (Eriksen |
| Citrate synthase activity | 16 overweight and obese PCOS | ↔ | – | (Hutchison |
| 25 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↔ | – | (Konopka | |
| 9 lean insulin-sensitive PCOS | ↔ | – | (Hansen | |
(↔), no differences; (–), not measured; PCOS, women with PCOS, ctrls, control women.
Studies of mitochondrial respiration: OXPHOS.
| Mitochondrial respiration: OXPHOS assessment | Population | Tissue | Study | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal muscle | Adipose tissue | |||
| OXPHOS gene expression | 16 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↓ | – | (Skov |
| 16 overweight and obese PCOS | ↔ | – | (Hutchison | |
| OXPHOS protein abundance | 16 overweight and obese PCOS | ↔ | – | (Hutchison |
| ATP synthesis | 8 insulin-resistant PCOS | ↔ (myotubes) | – | (Eriksen |
| Respiration (state 3) | 23 PCOS (9 lean and 14 obese) | ↔ | – | (Rabøl |
| 25 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↔ | – | (Konopka | |
| 18 PCOS | – | ↔ (subcutaneous gluteal) | (Lionett | |
| 16 PCOS | – | ↓ (subcutaneous abdominal) | (Lionett | |
| Respiration (state 4) | 25 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↑ | – | (Konopka |
| Uncoupling control ratio (electron transport capacity) | 23 PCOS (9 lean and 14 obese) | ↑ (in obese controls than any other group) | – | (Rabøl |
| Uncoupled respiration (maximal electron flux capacity) | 14 obese PCOS | ↓ | – | (Rabøl |
| 9 lean PCOS | ↔ | – | (Rabøl | |
| 25 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↔ | – | (Konopka | |
| Phosphorylation efficiency (ADP:O) | 25 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↓ | – | (Konopka |
| Coupling efficiency | 25 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↓ | – | (Konopka |
(↔), no differences; (↓), downregulation; (↑), upregulation; (–), not measured; PCOS, women with PCOS; ctrls, control women.
Studies of mitochondrial dynamics.
| Mitochondrial dynamics assessment | Population | Tissue | Study | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal muscle | Adipose tissue | |||
| 16 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↓ | – | (Skov | |
| 4 obese PCOS women | ↑ | – | (Dantas | |
| 16 overweight and obese PCOS | ↔ | – | (Hutchison | |
| 16 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↔ | – | (Skov | |
| NRF1 gene expression | ↔ | – | (Skov | |
| TFAM gene expression | 16 overweight and obese PCOS | ↔ | – | (Hutchison |
(↔), no differences; (↓), downregulation; (↑), upregulation; (–), not measured; PCOS, women with PCOS; ctrls, control women.
Studies of ROS production.
| ROS production assessment | Population | Tissue | Study | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal muscle | Adipose tissue | |||
| Mitochondrial H2O2 emissions | 25 obese insulin-resistant PCOS | ↑ | – | (Konopka |
(↑), upregulation; (–), not measured; PCOS, women with PCOS; ctrls, control women.
Effect of exercise interventions on mitochondrial characteristics in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue.
| Exercise intervention protocol (study) | Mitochondrial characteristic | Population | Tissue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal muscle | Adipose tissue | |||
| (Konopka | mtDNA copy number | 12 obese insulin-resistant PCOS Ex. | ↔ (within or between groups) | - |
| CS activity | 12 obese insulin-resistant PCOS Ex. | ↑ (within PCOS Ex. Group and between PCOS Ex. and PCOS Non-Ex) | - | |
| (Hutchison | CS activity | 8 obese PCOS Ex. | ↔ (within and between groups) | - |
| (Hansen | CS activity | 9 lean insulin-sensitive PCOS Ex. | ↑ (65% increase within the groups) | - |
| CS activity | 9 lean insulin-sensitive PCOS Ex. | ↔ (between the groups) | - | |
| (Hutchison | OXPHOS protein abundance | 8 obese PCOS Ex. | ↔ (within and between groups) | - |
| Complex III abundance | 8 obese PCOS Ex. | ↔ | - | |
| Complex IV (sub.4) gene expression | 8 obese PCOS Ex. | ↑ | - | |
| (Konopka | Respiration (state 3) | 12 obese insulin-resistant PCOS Ex. | ↑ (within PCOS Ex.) | - |
| Respiration (state 4) | 12 obese insulin-resistant PCOS Ex. | ↔ (within and between groups) | - | |
| Uncoupled respiration | 12 obese insulin-resistant PCOS Ex. | ↑ (within PCOS Ex.) | - | |
| Phosphorylation efficiency (ADP:O) | 12 obese insulin-resistant PCOS Ex. | ↑ (within PCOS Ex. and between groups) | - | |
| Coupling efficiency | 12 obese insulin-resistant PCOS Ex. | ↑ (within PCOS Ex.) | - | |
| (Lionett | Respiration (state 3) | 11 PCOS Ex. | - | ↔ (subcutaneous gluteal) (within or between groups) |
| Respiration (state 3) | 9 PCOS Ex. | - | ↔ (subcutaneous abdominal) (within or between groups) | |
| (Hutchison | 8 obese PCOS Ex. | ↔ (within or between groups) | - | |
| (Dantas | 4 obese PCOS Ex. | ↔ | - | |
| 4 body composition-matched Non-PCOS Ex. | ↑ | - | ||
| (Konopka | mtH2O2 emissions (during leak/state-4 respiration) | 12 obese insulin-resistant PCOS Ex. | ↓ (within PCOS Ex. and between groups) | - |
(↔), no differences; (↓), downregulation; (↑), upregulation; (–), not measured; AET, aerobic exercise training; HR, heart rate; Wmax, maximal Watts; VO2peak,peak oxygen uptake; VO2max, maximal volume of oxygen uptake; PCOS Ex., women with PCOS allocated in the exercise training group; PCOS Non-Ex., women with PCOS allocated in the sedentary group; non-PCOS Ex., women without PCOS allocated in the exercise training group.