| Literature DB >> 35058528 |
Małgorzata Kubczak1, Ainur B Khassenova2, Bartosz Skalski3, Sylwia Michlewska4, Marzena Wielanek5, Maria Skłodowska5, Araylim N Aralbayeva6, Zhanar S Nabiyeva2, Maira K Murzakhmetova2,7, Maria Zamaraeva8, Maria Bryszewska9, Maksim Ionov10.
Abstract
Plants have served for centuries as sources of compounds useful for human health such as antioxidant, anti-diabetic and antitumor agents. They are also rich in nutrients that improve the human diet. Growing demands for these compounds make it important to seek new sources for them. Hippophae rhamnoides L. is known as a plant with health-promoting properties. In this study we investigated the chemical composition and biological properties of bioactive components of ethanol extracts from leaves and twigs of H. rhamnoides L. Chemical components such as the total content of phenolic compounds, vitamins and amino acids and the antioxidant activities of these compounds in cellular and cell-free systems were assessed. The results suggest that the studied extracts are rich in bioactive compounds with potent antioxidant properties. Cytotoxicity and hemotoxicity assays showed that the extracts had low toxicity on human cells over the range of concentrations tested. Interaction with human serum albumin was investigated and conformational changes were observed. Our results indicate that leaf and twig extracts of H. rhamnoides L. should be considered as a non-toxic source of bioactive compounds which may be of interest to the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35058528 PMCID: PMC8776824 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05104-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Representative Hippophae rhamnoides L. plants and their parts. Location—foothills of the Trans Ili Alatau Mountains (Almaty region, Kazakhstan). The plants were identified and voucher specimen No. 54 (H. rhamnoides L.) was deposited at the herbarium of the Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction (Almaty, Kazakhstan).
Content of phenolic compounds detected using HPLC in the extracts of H. rhamnoides L. leaves and twigs.
| No. according to HPLC RT order | Phenolic compoud | Synonymus | Quantification wavelengths A 235; 280; 325; 375 nm | Content [mg/g] in dry matter of extract | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | Twig | ||||
| 1 | Gallic acid | (3.4.5-Trihydroxybenzoic acid) | 280 | 1.633 ± 0.149 | 2.160 ± 0.208 |
| 2 | (Quinone) | 235 | 2.059 ± 0.189 | 1.484 ± 0.143 | |
| 3 | (3.5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid) | 420 | 2.302 ± 0.211 | 12.149 ± 1.191 | |
| 4 | Pyrocatechol | (1.2-Dihydroxybenzene. Catechol) | 280 | 0.248 ± 0.233 | 0.326 ± 0.041 |
| 5 | Protocatechuic acid | (3.4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid) | 420 | 0.419 ± 0.041 | 32.832 ± 3.161 |
| 6 | Neochlorogenic acid | ( | 325 | 0.182 ± 0.021 | 0.830 ± 0.087 |
| 7 | (−)-epigallocatechin | (monomeric flavan-3-ol) | 235 | 6.035 ± 0.592 | 6.765 ± 0.651 |
| 8 | (+)-Catechin | (flavan-3-ol) (monomeric flavan-3-ol) | 235 | 2.052 ± 0.186 | 14.962 ± 1.444 |
| 9 | 4-hydroxybenzoic acid | – | 235 | 3.923 ± 0.228 | 1.948 ± 0.198 |
| 10 | Procyanidin B2 | (pentahydroxyflavane); ( | 280 | 13.933 ± 1.276 | 15.549 ± 1.498 |
| 11 | Gentisic acid | (2.5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid) | 325 | 1.380 ± 0.162 | 0.334 ± 0.006 |
| 12 | 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde | – | 280 | 0.171 ± 0.016 | 0.185 ± 0.0187 |
| 13 | Chlorogenic acid | ( | 325 | 0.144 ± 0.013 | 0.058 ± 0.006 |
| 14 | Vanilic acid | (4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoic acid) | 420 | 0.142 ± 0.015 | 0.328 ± 0.031 |
| 15 | (2.4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid) | 420 | 0.278 ± 0.025 | 0.889 ± 0.091 | |
| 16 | Caffeic acid | ( | 325 | 0.132 ± 0.014 | 0.045 ± 0.005 |
| 17 | (−)-epicatechin | (monomeric flavan-3-ol) ((−)- | 235 | 2.353 ± 0.225 | 1.440 ± 0.123 |
| 18 | Syringic acid | (4-Hydroxy-3.5-dimethoxybenzoic acid) | 420 | 0.758 ± 0.066 | 0.902 ± 0.047 |
| 19 | 1.3-Dicaffeoylquinic acid | 325 | 0.182 ± 0.021 | 0.062 ± 0.006 | |
| 20 | Cyanidin | 280 | 1.665 ± 0.153 | 0.974 ± 0.098 | |
| 21 | Syringaldehyde | (4-Hyroksy-3.5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde) | 280 | 0.228 ± 0.024 | 0.969 ± 0.102 |
| 22 | ( | 325 | 0.677 ± 0.069 | 0.488 ± 0.047 | |
| 23 | Ferulic acid | (4-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-cinnamic acid) | 420 | 0.137 ± 0.014 | 0.286 ± 0.006 |
| 24 | Coumarin | (1.2-Benzopyrone) | 280 | 0.311 ± 0.029 | 0.237 ± 0.023 |
| 25 | Sinapic acid | (4-Hydroxy-3.5-dimethoxy-cinnamic acid) | 420 | 0.129 ± 0.004 | 0.552 ± 0.055 |
| 26 | ( | 280 | 0.491 ± 0.051 | 0.122 ± 0.011 | |
| 27 | Luteolin | 7- | 325 | 2.018 ± 0.089 | 0.583 ± 0.061 |
| 28 | Rutin | (quercetin-3- | 375 | 7.791 ± 0.731 | 0.649 ± 0.051 |
| 29 | Ellagic acid | (4.4′.5.5′.6.6′-Hexahydroxydiphenic acid 2.6.2′.6′-dilactone) | 235 | 4.444 ± 0.416 | 0.456 ± 0.047 |
| 30 | Hesperidin | (Hesperetin-7-rutinoside) | 280 | 4.949 ± 0.311 | 0.610 ± 0.062 |
| 32 | ( | 420 | 0.289 ± 0.029 | 0 | |
| 31 | Rosmarinic acid | (R,E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-((3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)acryloyl)oxy)propanoic acid | 420 | 11.642 ± 1.065 | 1.452 ± 0.014 |
| 33 | Salicylic acid | (2-Hydroxybenzoic acid) | 420 | 0.701 ± 0.067 | 0.961 ± 0.098 |
| 34 | Myricetin | (flavonol) (3.3′.4′.5.5′.7-Hexahydroxyflavone) | 375 | 0.720 ± 0.075 | 0.413 ± 0.042 |
| 35 | Quercetin | (flavonol) (3.3′.4′.5.7-Pentahydroxyflavone) | 375 | 0.149 ± 0.011 | 0.049 ± 0.005 |
| 36 | 280 | 0.136 ± 0.014 | 0.094 ± 0.009 | ||
| 37 | Naringenin | (4′.5.7-Trihydroxyflavanone) | 280 | 0.019 ± 0.002 | 0.236 ± 0.032 |
| 38 | Luteolin | (3′.4′.5.7-Tetrahydroxyflavone) | 325 | 2.772 ± 0.266 | 0.787 ± 0.077 |
| 39 | Kaempferol | (3.4′.5.7-Tetrahydroxyflavone) | 375 | 0.193 ± 0.015 | 0.026 ± 0.003 |
| 40 | 3-Hydroxyflavone | Flavonol | 325 | 0.131 ± 0.016 | 0.125 ± 0.012 |
Values are means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2Content of phenolic compounds in the extracts of Hippophae rhamnoides L. leaves and twigs. Values are means ± SD (n = 3).
Total amino acid content in dry matter of extracts of twigs and leaves from Hippophae rhamnoides L.
| Amino acids | Content (mg/g) in dry matter of extract | |
|---|---|---|
| Leaf | Twig | |
| Arginine | 6.56 ± 0.08 | 8.72 ± 0.06 |
| Lysine | 5.2 ± 0.07 | 3.13 ± 0.01 |
| Tyrosine | – | 1.00 ± 0.01 |
| Phenylalanine | 7.01 ± 0.05 | 2.90 ± 0.02 |
| Histidine | – | 5.81 ± 0.03 |
| Leucine + isoleucine | 6.56 ± 0.07 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| Methionine | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 3.35 ± 0.04 |
| Valine | 8.37 ± 0 .07 | 3.13 ± 0.03 |
| Proline | 8.14 ± 0.06 | 6.71 ± 0.05 |
| Threonine | 4.52 ± 0.03 | 2.23 ± 0.01 |
| Serine | 4.75 ± 0.04 | 2.46 ± 0.01 |
| Alanine | 4.98 ± 0.02 | 2.21 ± 0.02 |
| Glycine | 5.20 ± 0.03 | 2.68 ± 0.02 |
| Total content | 6.18 | 4.48 |
Values are means ± SD (n = 3).
Content of water-soluble vitamins (A) and tocopherol isomers (B) in dry matter of extracts of twigs and leaves from Hippophae rhamnoides L.
| Water soluble vitamins | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vitamins | Content (mg/g) in dry matter of extract | |
| Leaf | Twig | |
| B1 (thiamine) | 3.0 ± 0.19 | 0.39 ± 0.06 |
| B2 (riboflavin) | 4.0 ± 0.21 | 0.33 ± 0.05 |
| B3 (niacin) | 3.0 ± 0.14 | 3.8 ± 0.29 |
| B5 (pantothenic acid) | 2.8 ± 0.09 | 2.2 ± 0.08 |
| B6 (pyridoxine) | 5.4 ± 0.22 | 7.6 ± 0.32 |
| Folic acid | 0.8 ± 0.07 | 0.9 ± 0.05 |
Values are means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3Antioxidant potential of Hippophae rhamnoides L. extracts: (1)—Percentage of DPPH free radical scavenging by the leaf and twig extracts of Hippophae rhamnoides L. over the concentration range of 0.5–50 µg/ml. Incubation time 10 min. The data represent mean ± SEM of three independent repetitions. (2)—The effect of Hippophae rhamnoides L. twig and leaf extracts (0.5–50 μg/ml) on protein carbonylation induced by H2O2/Fe. The data represent mean ± SEM of three independent repetitions. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.001 versus control. Control—extracts free plasma treated with H2O2/Fe. (3, 4)—Effect of the Hippophae rhamnoides L. twig and leaf extracts on H2O2/Fe-induced ROS production in BJ cells. Incubation time 24 h. Left panel (3)—Confocal microscopy images of (A) control (not treated BJ cells); (B) H2O2, 80 µmol/l; (C) Twig extract, 50 µg/ml; (D) Leaf extract, 50 µg/ml. Fluorescence intensity of ROS in BJ cells. The data are presented as mean ± SD of 5–7 repeats. **p < 0.001. ***p < 0.0001 versus ROS.
Figure 4(A) The hemolytic activity of the Hippophae rhamnoides L. leaf and the twig extracts after 24 h incubation. (B) The viability of the BJ cells in the presence of Hippophae rhamnoides L. extracts at the concentration ranged from 0.5 to 50 μg/ml. Incubation time 24 h. The data represent mean ± SEM of three independent repetitions. Ns—not statistically significant.
Figure 5(A) Ellipticity changes and (B) changes in the secondary structure of HSA at the presence of varying ratios of the Hippophae rhamnoides L. leaf and twig extracts. HSA concentration 1 µmol/l.
Figure 6Kazakhstan with the Almaty region (shaded area on the map). A: Study region in southeastern Almaty (lined area on the inset). Map was created using CorelDraw 2017 (www.coreldraw.com/pl/?link=um) licensed by the University of Lodz.