Literature DB >> 35058160

Using Participatory Design to Engage Physicians in the Development of a Provider-Level Performance Dashboard and Feedback System.

Sajan Patel, Logan Pierce, Maggie Jones, Andrew Lai, Michelle Cai, Bradley A Sharpe, James D Harrison.   

Abstract

PROBLEM DEFINITION: Performance feedback, in which clinicians are given data on select metrics, is widely used in the context of quality improvement. However, there is a lack of practical guidance describing the process of developing performance feedback systems. INITIAL APPROACH: This study took place at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) with hospitalist physicians. Participatory design methodology was used to develop a performance dashboard and feedback system. Twenty hospitalist physicians participated in a series of six design sessions and two surveys. Each design session and survey systematically addressed key components of the feedback system, including design, metric selection, data delivery, and incentives. The Capability Opportunity Motivation and Behavior (COM-B) model was then used to identify behavior change interventions to facilitate engagement with the dashboard during a pilot implementation. KEY INSIGHTS, LESSONS LEARNED: In regard to performance improvement, physicians preferred collaboration over competition and internal motivation over external incentives. Physicians preferred that the dashboard be used as a tool to aid in clinical practice improvement and not punitively by leadership. Metrics that were clinical or patient-centered were perceived as more meaningful and more likely to motivate behavior change. NEXT STEPS: The performance dashboard has been introduced to the entire hospitalist group, and evaluation of implementation continues by monitoring engagement and physician attitudes. This will be followed by targeted feedback interventions to attempt to improve performance.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35058160      PMCID: PMC8885889          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  14 in total

Review 1.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Noah Ivers; Gro Jamtvedt; Signe Flottorp; Jane M Young; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Simon D French; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marit Johansen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

2.  Practice Feedback Interventions: 15 Suggestions for Optimizing Effectiveness.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Heather L Colquhoun; Kevin W Eva; Kelly Carroll; Anne Sales; Susan Michie; Noah Ivers; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Next-generation audit and feedback for inpatient quality improvement using electronic health record data: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sajan Patel; Alvin Rajkomar; James D Harrison; Priya A Prasad; Victoria Valencia; Sumant R Ranji; Michelle Mourad
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Clinician user involvement in the real world: Designing an electronic tool to improve interprofessional communication and collaboration in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Terence Tang; Morgan E Lim; Elizabeth Mansfield; Alexander McLachlan; Sherman D Quan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Use of provider-level dashboards and pay-for-performance in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Authors:  Henry J Michtalik; Howard T Carolan; Elliott R Haut; Brandyn D Lau; Michael B Streiff; Joseph Finkelstein; Peter J Pronovost; Nowella Durkin; Daniel J Brotman
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 2.960

6.  On the application of motivation theory to human factors/ergonomics: motivational design principles for human-technology interaction.

Authors:  James L Szalma
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 7.  A systematic review of electronic audit and feedback: intervention effectiveness and use of behaviour change theory.

Authors:  Timothy Tuti; Jacinta Nzinga; Martin Njoroge; Benjamin Brown; Niels Peek; Mike English; Chris Paton; Sabine N van der Veer
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Design Thinking in Health Care.

Authors:  Myra Altman; Terry T K Huang; Jessica Y Breland
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Anne Sales; Heather Colquhoun; Susan Michie; Robbie Foy; Jill J Francis; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Can feedback approaches reduce unwarranted clinical variation? A systematic rapid evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Reema Harrison; Reece Amr Hinchcliff; Elizabeth Manias; Steven Mears; David Heslop; Victoria Walton; Ru Kwedza
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  Electronic Co-design (ECO-design) Workshop for Increasing Clinician Participation in the Design of Health Services Interventions: Participatory Design Approach.

Authors:  April Savoy; Himalaya Patel; Umber Shahid; Alexis D Offner; Hardeep Singh; Traber D Giardina; Ashley N D Meyer
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-09-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.