| Literature DB >> 35057426 |
Hanan A Alfawaz1, Kaiser Wani2, Haya Alrakayan1, Abdullah M Alnaami2, Nasser M Al-Daghri2.
Abstract
This cross-sectional online survey aimed to determine the awareness of Arab adults on the benefits of consuming nutrient-dense foods, such as kale. A total of 1200 respondents completed the survey. The questionnaire included questions related to socio-economic information, e.g., whether the participants have consumed kale, if they observed any health effects, and 13 other questions to test their knowledge on this superfood. Only 276 (23%) of the participants had previously consumed kale, with 64.5% reporting favorable health outcomes, the most common of which was weight reduction, and only 17.8% reporting side effects, such as constipation and gastrointestinal irritation. From the 13 kale knowledge questions, the average total knowledge score, scaled from 0 to 10, was 3.5 and 3.7 for males and females, respectively. The regression analysis revealed that age, income, and educational status were significant contributors for predicting better knowledge scores, as older individuals with a higher income and higher education scored higher (odds ratio of 2.96, 2.00 and 4.58, respectively). To summarize, there is a dearth of awareness about kale and its health benefits in Saudi Arabia. Kale should be promoted as a super food in all segments, particularly among the younger, lower-income, and less-educated sections of the population.Entities:
Keywords: Saudi Arabia; kale; nutrient-dense; obesity; superfood
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35057426 PMCID: PMC8782012 DOI: 10.3390/nu14020245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Socio-demographic characteristics of the study subjects.
| Parameters | All | Males | Females |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1200 | 476 | 724 |
| Age Group (Years) | |||
| 18–25 | 174 (14.5) | 61 (12.8) | 113 (15.6) |
| 26–35 | 644 (53.7) | 217 (45.6) | 427 (59) |
| 36–45 | 200 (16.6) | 105 (22.1) | 95 (13.1) |
| >45 | 182 (15.2) | 93 (19.5) | 89 (12.3) |
| Marital Status | |||
| Married | 445 (37.1) | 175 (36.8) | 270 (37.3) |
| Unmarried | 657 (54.8) | 271 (56.9) | 386 (53.3) |
| Divorced | 98 (8.2) | 30 (6.3) | 68 (9.4) |
| Family Income (SAR/Month) | |||
| <3000 | 138 (11.5) | 22 (4.6) | 116 (16) |
| 3001–9000 | 161 (13.4) | 57 (12) | 104 (14.4) |
| 9001–15,000 | 464 (38.7) | 186 (39.1) | 278 (38.4) |
| 15,001–21,000 | 315 (26.3) | 153 (32.1) | 162 (22.4) |
| >21,000 | 122 (10.2) | 58 (12.2) | 64 (8.8) |
| Educational Status | |||
| Secondary | 345 (28.8) | 180 (37.8) | 165 (22.8) |
| Graduate | 691 (57.6) | 262 (55) | 429 (59.3) |
| Post-graduate | 164 (13.7) | 34 (7.1) | 130 (18) |
Note: the data are presented as frequency (%).
Kale knowledge score for the study participants.
| Kale Knowledge Questionnaire | All (1200) | Male (476) | Female (724) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is kale considered a high calorie food? | 60.2 | 57.6 | 61.9 | 0.15 |
| Is kale considered a high nutritional value food? | 63.4 | 59.9 | 65.7 | 0.11 |
| Is kale considered a food with antioxidant properties? | 29.8 | 26.9 | 31.8 | 0.07 |
| Is kale considered a food with immune boosting properties? | 57.1 | 54.8 | 58.6 | 0.31 |
| Does excessive eating of kale cause constipation? | 11.5 | 13.2 | 10.4 | 0.06 |
| Is kale considered a food rich in fibers? | 55.3 | 50.8 | 58.1 | 0.02 |
| Is kale considered a food rich in vitamin C? | 31.2 | 29.0 | 32.6 | 0.37 |
| Is kale consumption considered bad for people suffering from digestive problems? | 13.7 | 16.0 | 12.2 | 0.05 |
| Is kale considered a food with anti-carcinogenic properties? | 17.2 | 16.8 | 17.4 | 0.88 |
| Is kale considered a food with anti-inflammatory properties? | 19.0 | 19.3 | 18.8 | 0.92 |
| Is kale considered a food high in fats? | 57.8 | 56.9 | 58.3 | 0.19 |
| Does kale play a role in controlling chronic diseases? | 29.8 | 31.7 | 28.6 | 0.47 |
| Does the nutritional value of kale increase after cooking? | 16.1 | 11.6 | 19.1 | <0.01 |
| Total Knowledge Score | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | 0.12 |
Note: The data are presented as % of participants who answered correctly. Kale knowledge score was devised such that if all 13 questions were answered correctly it was correspondingly scaled as “10”, while those who had no correct answers at all were scaled as “0”. The difference between males and females was calculated using chi-square test and independent samples t-test for proportions and continuous normal variables, respectively.
Figure 1A bar graph depicting the knowledge about benefits of kale consumption among the study participants. The dotted line shows the average in both sexes.
Knowledge scores according to socio-demographic characteristics.
| Parameters | All Subjects (1200) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile 1 (400) | Tertile 2 (400) | Tertile 3 (400) | Tertile3 vs. Tertile1 | ||
| Total Knowledge Score | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.1 | OR (95% CI) | |
| Age Group (Years) | |||||
| 18–25 (174) | 43.1 | 32.8 | 24.1 | Reference | 0.002 |
| 26–35 (644) | 32.1 | 35.4 | 32.5 | 1.80 (1.2, 2.8) ** | |
| 36–45 (200) | 35.5 | 29 | 35.5 | 1.79 (1.1, 2.9) * | |
| >45 (182) | 25.8 | 31.3 | 42.9 | 2.96 (1.8, 5.0) ** | |
| Marital Status | |||||
| Married (445) | 33.7 | 33 | 33.3 | Reference | 0.55 |
| Unmarried (657) | 33.9 | 33.8 | 32.3 | 0.96 (0.7, 1.3) | |
| Divorced (98) | 27.6 | 31.6 | 40.8 | 1.50 (0.9, 2.6) | |
| Family Income (SAR/Month) | |||||
| <3000 (138) | 39.1 | 31.2 | 29.7 | 0.80 (0.5, 1.3) | 0.006 |
| 3001–9000 (161) | 41 | 34.8 | 24.2 | 0.63 (0.4, 0.9) * | |
| 9001–15,000 (464) | 35.1 | 31.7 | 33.2 | Reference | |
| 15,001–21,000 (315) | 28.3 | 35.9 | 35.9 | 1.34 (0.9, 1.9) | |
| >21,000 (122) | 23 | 33.6 | 43.4 | 2.00 (1.2, 3.3) ** | |
| Education Level | |||||
| Secondary (345) | 34.8 | 34.2 | 31 | Reference | <0.001 |
| Graduate (691) | 37.2 | 34 | 28.8 | 0.87 (0.6, 1.2) | |
| Post-graduate (164) | 14 | 28.7 | 57.3 | 4.58 (2.7, 7.7) ** | |
| Parameters | Males (476) | ||||
| Tertile 1 (159) | Tertile 2 (158) | Tertile 3 (159) | Tertile 3 vs. Tertile 1 | ||
| Total Knowledge Score | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | OR (95% C.I.) | |
| Age Group (Years) | |||||
| 18–25 (61) | 36.1 | 34.4 | 29.5 | Reference | 0.11 |
| 26–35 (217) | 33.6 | 37.3 | 29 | 1.05 (0.5, 2.1) | |
| 36–45 (105) | 38.1 | 27.6 | 34.3 | 1.10 (0.5, 2.3) | |
| >45 (93) | 25.8 | 29 | 45.2 | 2.14 (0.9, 4.7) | |
| Marital Status | |||||
| Married (175) | 33.1 | 33.7 | 33.1 | Reference | 0.21 |
| Unmarried (271) | 34.3 | 34.3 | 31.4 | 0.91 (0.6, 1.5) | |
| Divorced (30) | 26.7 | 20 | 53.3 | 2.00 (0.8, 5.0) | |
| Family Income (SAR/Month) | |||||
| <3000 (22) | 45.5 | 31.8 | 22.7 | 0.45 (0.1, 1.4) | 0.70 |
| 3001–9000 (57) | 38.6 | 36.8 | 24.6 | 0.59 (0.3, 1.3) | |
| 9001–15,000 (186) | 31.7 | 33.3 | 34.9 | Reference | |
| 15,001–21,000 (153) | 32 | 34 | 34 | 0.96 (0.6, 1.6) | |
| >21,000 (58) | 32.8 | 27.6 | 39.7 | 1.10 (0.5, 2.2) | |
| Education Level | |||||
| Secondary (180) | 32.2 | 31.1 | 36.7 | Reference | 0.016 |
| Graduate (262) | 35.9 | 35.5 | 28.6 | 0.72 (0.5, 1.1) | |
| Post-graduate (34) | 20.6 | 26.5 | 52.9 | 2.66 (1.1, 7.0) * | |
| Parameters | Females (724) | ||||
| Tertile 1 (241) | Tertile 2 (241) | Tertile 3 (242) | Tertile 3 vs. Tertile 1 | ||
| Total Knowledge score | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | OR (95% CI) | |
| Age Group (Years) | |||||
| 18–25 (113) | 46 | 31 | 23 | Reference | 0.03 |
| 26–35 (427) | 30.9 | 35.4 | 33.7 | 2.18 (1.3, 3.7) ** | |
| 36–45 (95) | 33.7 | 29.5 | 36.8 | 2.19 (1.1, 4.3) * | |
| >45 (89) | 28.1 | 30.3 | 41.6 | 2.96 (1.5, 5.9) ** | |
| Marital Status | |||||
| Married (270) | 35.2 | 30.4 | 34.4 | Reference | 0.49 |
| Unmarried (386) | 32.9 | 35.5 | 31.6 | 0.98 (0.7, 1.4) | |
| Divorced (68) | 27.9 | 32.4 | 39.7 | 1.45 (0.8, 2.8) | |
| Family Income (SAR/Month) | |||||
| <3000 (116) | 37.1 | 25.9 | 37.1 | 1.18 (0.7, 1.9) | 0.001 |
| 3001–9000 (104) | 42.3 | 31.7 | 26 | 0.73 (0.4, 1.3) | |
| 9001–15,000 (278) | 37.1 | 31.7 | 31.3 | Reference | |
| 15,001–21,000 (162) | 26.5 | 37.7 | 35.8 | 1.59 (0.9, 2.6) | |
| >21,000 (64) | 12.5 | 45.3 | 42.2 | 3.99 (1.7, 9.2) ** | |
| Education Level | |||||
| Secondary (165) | 40.6 | 34.5 | 24.8 | Reference | <0.001 |
| Graduate (429) | 36.8 | 34 | 29.1 | 1.29 (0.8, 2.0) | |
| Post-graduate (130) | 12.3 | 29.2 | 58.5 | 7.76 (3.9, 15.1) ** | |
Note: The data are presented as % of participants in each sub-group of knowledge score tertiles and socio-demographics. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated by running a regression analysis showing the odds of having a kale knowledge score in the highest tertile (tertile 3) compared to the lowest tertile (tertile 1) in all subjects, males only and females only. p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. * and ** represent p-values at <0.05 and <0.01 levels, respectively.
Figure 2A bar graph depicting the kale knowledge scores in study participants divided according to (a) age group, (b) marital status, (c) income and (d) educational status. The error bar shows the standard error of the mean.
Kale consumption and its health effects in the study participants.
| All | Male | Female | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1200 | 476 | 724 | |
| Have You Ever Heard about Kale? | ||||
| Yes | 585 (48.8) | 201 (42.2) | 384 (53) | <0.001 |
| No | 615 (51.3) | 275 (57.8) | 340 (47) | |
| Have You Consumed Kale Before? | ||||
| Yes | 276 (23) | 87 (18.3) | 189 (26.1) | 0.002 |
| No | 924 (77) | 389 (81.7) | 535 (73.9) | |
| How Many Times a Week Were You Consuming Kale? | ||||
| Once | 199 (72.1) | 48 (55.2) | 151 (79.9) | <0.001 |
| 2–3 times | 61 (22.1) | 33 (37.9) | 28 (14.8) | |
| >3 times | 16 (5.8) | 6 (6.9) | 10 (5.3) | |
| Have You Noticed Any Positive Effects on Health? | ||||
| Yes | 178 (64.5) | 62 (71.3) | 115 (60.8) | 0.11 |
| No | 98 (35.5) | 25 (28.7) | 74 (39.2) | |
| If Yes, Mention the Positive Effects? | ||||
| Weight Loss | 91 (51.1) | 28 (45.2) | 63 (54.8) | 0.14 |
| Decrease in appetite | 36 (20.2) | 18 (29) | 18 (15.7) | |
| Improved bowel movement | 30 (16.9) | 11 (17.7) | 19 (16.5) | |
| Energy boost | 21 (11.8) | 5 (8.1) | 15 (13) | |
| Any Side Effects? | ||||
| Yes | 49 (17.8) | 17 (19.5) | 32 (16.9) | 0.74 |
| No | 227 (82.2) | 70 (80.5) | 157 (83.1) | |
| If Yes, Mention the Side Effects? | ||||
| Constipation | 25 (51) | 10 (58.8) | 15 (46.9) | 0.69 |
| Bloating | 12 (24.5) | 4 (23.5) | 8 (25) | |
| Bowel irritability | 10 (20.4) | 2 (11.8) | 8 (25) | |
| Others | 2 (4.1) | 1 (5.9) | 1 (3.1) | |
| Mode of Consumption? | ||||
| Fresh | 158 (57.2) | 46 (52.9) | 112 (59.3) | 0.69 |
| Cooked | 53 (19.2) | 17 (19.5) | 36 (19) | |
| Supplement | 47 (17) | 18 (20.7) | 29 (15.3) | |
| Powder | 18 (6.5) | 6 (6.9) | 12 (6.3) | |
Note: The data are presented as frequency (%) of participants in each sub-group. The difference between males and females was calculated by chi-squared test.