| Literature DB >> 35057286 |
Ana Maria Roman1, Victor Geantă2, Ramona Cimpoeșu1, Corneliu Munteanu3, Nicoleta Monica Lohan1, Georgeta Zegan4, Eduard Radu Cernei4, Iulian Ioniță1, Nicanor Cimpoeșu1, Nicoleta Ioanid4.
Abstract
Special materials are required in many applications to fulfill specific medical or industrial necessities. Biodegradable metallic materials present many attractive properties, especially mechanical ones correlated with good biocompatibility with vivant bodies. A biodegradable iron-based material was realized through electric arc-melting and induction furnace homogenization. The new chemical composition obtained presented a special property named SME (shape memory effect) based on the martensite transformation. Preliminary results about this special biodegradable material with a new chemical composition were realized for the chemical composition and structural and thermal characterization. Corrosion resistance was evaluated in Ringer's solution through immersion tests for 1, 3, and 7 days, the solution pH was measured in time for 3 days with values for each minute, and electro-corrosion was measured using a potentiostat and a three electrode cell. The mass loss of the samples during immersion and electro-corrosion was evaluated and the surface condition was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). SME was highlighted with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results confirm the possibility of a memory effect of the materials in the wrought case and a generalized corrosion (Tafel and cyclic potentiometry and EIS) with the formation of iron oxides and a corrosion rate favorable for applications that require a longer implantation period.Entities:
Keywords: iron based biodegradable alloy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35057286 PMCID: PMC8777802 DOI: 10.3390/ma15020568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Experimental results after chemical composition analysis for the initial cast sample and wrought state (average values after five determinations on different 1 mm2 areas).
| Elements/State | Fe | Mn | Si | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt% | at% | wt% | at% | wt% | at% | |
| Cast | 82.29 | 79.11 | 13.88 | 13.56 | 3.83 | 7.32 |
| Wrought | 82.16 | 79.33 | 14.47 | 14.2 | 3.37 | 6.48 |
| EDS error % | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||
Standard deviation (StDev): Fe ±0.15, Mn: ±0.1 and Si: ±0.05.
Figure 1XRD spectra of FeMnSi: (a) cast and (b) wrought.
Figure 2SEM micrographs of FeMnSi SMA (a) cast and (b) wrought.
Figure 3DSC diagram of C and W samples in −50 to 200 °C domain (heating from 25 to 200 °C and cooling to −50 and back to 25 °C) and γ-ε forward transformation through cooling and ε-γ reverse transformation through heating.
Figure 4The pH variation during 72 h of immersion at 37 °C of melted and wrought sample.
The results of the masses of the experimental samples after 1, 3, and 7 days of immersion in Ringer’s solution (five repetitive mass determinations were done on the same sample) and the corresponding degradation rate.
| Sample | 1 Day | 3 Days | 7 Days | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cast Sample (C) | Wrought Sample (W) | Cast Sample (C) | Wrought Sample (W) | Cast Sample (C) | Wrought Sample (W) | |
| Initial mass (mg) | 3182.7 | 563.1 | 2756.6 | 471.9 | 2989.7 | 513.8 |
| Mass after immersion (mg) | 3184.3 | 563.3 | 2756.3 | 465.7 | 2984.3 | 511.5 |
| Mass after ultrasonic cleaning (mg) | 3182.0 | 562.6(−0.5) | 2752.8 | 463.9 | 2983.9 | 510.5 |
| DR (mm/year) | 0.088 | 0.084 | 0.159 | 0.451 | 0.104 | 0.080 |
Standard deviation: ±0.1 mg.
The chemical composition of the FeMnSi alloy after 1 day and 7 days of immersion in Ringer’s solution and after ultrasonic cleaning after each period for both cast and wrought samples.
| El./Samples | Fe | Mn | Si | O | C | Cl | Na | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt% | at% | wt% | at% | wt% | at% | wt% | at% | wt% | at% | wt% | at% | wt% | at% | |||
| 1 day | C | I | 56.16 | 29.39 | 8.75 | 4.66 | 1.86 | 1.93 | 22.02 | 40.23 | 8.39 | 20.42 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 2.33 | 2.96 |
| I + UC | 67.55 | 42.43 | 12.3 | 7.85 | 2.78 | 3.47 | 5.89 | 12.9 | 11.37 | 33.2 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.1 | ||
| W | I | 48.77 | 22.01 | 5.74 | 2.63 | 1.23 | 1.1 | 33.53 | 52.83 | 9.82 | 20.62 | 0.51 | 0.37 | 0.4 | 0.44 | |
| I + UC | 53.11 | 25.8 | 8.38 | 4.14 | 1.77 | 1.71 | 25.06 | 42.49 | 11.32 | 25.57 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.06 | ||
| 7 days | C | I | 57.92 | 29.92 | 10.29 | 5.4 | 2.32 | 2.39 | 13.54 | 24.41 | 15.65 | 37.6 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.17 |
| I + UC | 56.85 | 28.53 | 9.78 | 4.99 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 14.56 | 25.5 | 16.59 | 38.7 | - | - | 0.28 | 0.34 | ||
| W | I | 45.57 | 19.99 | 7.1 | 3.17 | 1.57 | 1.37 | 32.53 | 49.83 | 11.87 | 24.23 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 1.24 | 1.32 | |
| I + UC | 52.81 | 25.16 | 7.7 | 3.73 | 2.05 | 1.94 | 21.73 | 36.13 | 14.13 | 31.3 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 1.23 | 1.42 | ||
| EDS detector error % | 1.54 | 0.31 | 0.17 | 4.04 | 4.23 | 0.07 | 0.18 | |||||||||
C: cast, W: wrought, I: after immersion, I + UC: after immersion and ultrasound cleaning. StDev: Fe: ±0.9, Mn: ±0.5, Si: ±0.22, O: ±0.2, C: ±0.1, Cl: ±0.1, Na: ±0.1.
Figure 5SEM images of the surface: (a) C sample after 1 day immersion (1 kx) and (b) after ultrasound cleaning (5 kx), (c) W sample after 1 day immersion (1 kx) and (d) after ultrasound cleaning (5 kx), (e) C sample after 7 days immersion (1 kx), and (f) after ultrasound cleaning (2 kx), (g) W sample after 7 days immersion (1 kx) and (h) after ultrasound cleaning (2 kx).
Figure 6X-ray mapping of chemical elements on the surface. The initial samples, cast (a) and wrought (f), (b); C sample after 1 day immersion and (c) after ultrasound cleaning; (d) C sample after 7 days immersion and (e) after ultrasound cleaning; (g) W sample after 1 day immersion and (h) after ultrasound cleaning; (i) W sample after 7 days immersion and (j) after ultrasound cleaning.
Figure 7(a) Tafel and (b) cyclic diagrams for C and W samples.
Linear Tafel parameters for C and W samples.
| Sample | Ecorr | ba | bc | Rp | Jcorr | Vcorr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | −930.7 | 324.8 | −224.3 | 388.57 | 2.17 | 132.9 |
| W | −678.9 | 95.2 | −156.7 | 1000.42 | 0.11 | 24.47 |
= Ω−1 sn/cm2 ≡ S·sn/cm2, ω is theangular frequency (ω = 2πf, f is the frequency of the applied alternating current), and j is the imaginary number; j = (−1)½.
The values of the equivalent circuit for sample C.
| R(QR) |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 29.8 | 9.424 | 0.684 | 199.8 | 1.33 | |||
| ε (%): 0.6998 | 2.135 | 1.705 | 3.828 | ||||
| R(QR)(QR) |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29.26 | 0.01193 | 0.610 | 73.63 | 0.02281 | 0.9851 | 91.51 | 0.440 |
| ε: 0.6998 | 13.06 | 3.691 | 129.8 | 100.2 | 17.1 | 90.7 | |
| R(CR)(QR) |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 29.27 | 0.02468 | 85.33 | 0.01175 | 0.612 | 80.47 | 0.438 | |
| ε: 0.6437 | 13.51 | 13.55 | 6.191 | 3.33 | 21.8 | ||
The authors tried three circuits that seem to be suitable for interpretation, with the values presented in Table 5.
Figure 8Electrochemical measurements of tested samples for (a) Bode plots, (b) Nyquist plots.
The values of the equivalent circuit for sample C.
| (R(QR(LR)) |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rs (ohm·cm2) | Q (S·sn/cm2) | n | Rct (ohm·cm2) | L (Henry·cm2) | RL (ohm·cm2) | 103.χ2 |
| 36.29 | 0.001161 | 0.665 | 424.1 | 1881 | 655.8 | 1.30 |
| ε%: 1.737 | 4.379 | 1.829 | 4.237 | 12.94 | 7.04 | |