| Literature DB >> 35057245 |
Denis N Chausov1, Veronika V Smirnova1, Dmitriy E Burmistrov1, Ruslan M Sarimov1, Alexander D Kurilov1, Maxim E Astashev1, Oleg V Uvarov1, Mikhail V Dubinin2, Valery A Kozlov1,3, Maria V Vedunova1,4, Maksim B Rebezov1,5, Anastasia A Semenova5, Andrey B Lisitsyn5, Sergey V Gudkov1,4.
Abstract
Microbial antibiotic resistance is an important global world health problem. Recently, an interest in nanoparticles (NPs) of silver oxides as compounds with antibacterial potential has significantly increased. From a practical point of view, composites of silver oxide NPs and biocompatible material are of interest. A borosiloxane (BS) can be used as one such material. A composite material combining BS and silver oxide NPs has been synthesized. Composites containing BS have adjustable viscoelastic properties. The silver oxide NPs synthesized by laser ablation have a size of ~65 nm (half-width 60 nm) and an elemental composition of Ag2O. The synthesized material exhibits strong bacteriostatic properties against E. coli at a concentration of nanoparticles of silver oxide more than 0.01%. The bacteriostatic effect depends on the silver oxide NPs concentration in the matrix. The BS/silver oxide NPs have no cytotoxic effect on a eukaryotic cell culture when the concentration of nanoparticles of silver oxide is less than 0.1%. The use of the resulting composite based on BS and silver oxide NPs as a reusable dry disinfectant is due to its low toxicity and bacteriostatic activity and its characteristics are not inferior to the medical alloy nitinol.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial; biocompatibility; borosiloxane; composite; cytotoxicity; nanoparticles; silver oxide
Year: 2022 PMID: 35057245 PMCID: PMC8780406 DOI: 10.3390/ma15020527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The example of photomicrograph of a cell culture. Green staining corresponds to mitochondria (used to evaluate shape and size of cells); blue staining indicates nuclei of viable. Purple staining indicates of nuclei of non-viable cells.
Figure 2Physicochemical characterization of silver oxide NPs. (A)—Concentration (DLS) and size (CPS) distribution of silver oxide NPs. (B)—Zeta potential distribution of synthesized silver oxide NPs. (C)—Optical absorption spectrum of silver oxide NPs colloid. (D)—TEM microphotography silver oxide NPs.
Figure 3Elemental analysis of the resulting nanoparticles. (A)—TEM image of Ag2O nanoparticles. (B)—Visualization Ag Kα1. (C)—Visualization O Kα1. (D)—multilayer image (Ag Kα1 + O Kα1). (E)—Spectrum of the sample (X-axis—Energy, keV, Y-axis—Distribution, pulse/sec/eV).
Figure 4(A)—Photo of the BS, (B)—representation of the BS structure. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dotted line.
Figure 5Frequency (a) and temperature (b) dependences of viscoelastic properties of the resulting compositions.
Figure 6AFM surface topography of a composition based on borosiloxane and silver oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 7X-ray diffraction patterns of the resulting compositions.
Figure 8Influense of a BS and composition Ag2O NPs·BS on the generation of ROS during 2 h at 40 ℃. (A)—H2O2 generation. (B)—OH-radicals production. *—p < 0.05 vs. control. Data are shown as means ± SEMs.
Figure 9Effect of BS and composition Ag2O NPs·BS on markers of proteins and DNA damage generation. (A)—Production of long-lived reactive protein species. (B)—Production of 8-oxoGua. *—p < 0.05 versus control. Data are shown as means ± SEMs.
Figure 10Effect of BS and composition Ag2O NPs·BS on the Escherichia coli proliferation and adhesion. (A)—E. coli proliferation during 24 h. (B)—Bacteria count on a substrate after detachment. *—p < 0.05 vs. control. Data are shown as means ± SEMs.
Figure 11Effect of a BS and composition Ag2O NPs·BS the of cell line SH-SY5Y proliferation, adhesion and survival. (A)—Survival of cells. (B)—Mitotic indexes. (C)—Density of cells monolayer. (D)—Space of surface without cells. *—p < 0.05 vs. control, **—p < 0.05 vs, NiTi. Data are shown as means ± SEMs.
Comparison of physical and biological properties of previously manufactured nanocomposites based on polymers and nanoparticles containing silver.
| Materials | NPs | Bacterial Strains | Effect * | MIC/MBC | Results | R ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chitosan | 300 | BS | – | coating resistant to external influences; antibacterial effect | [ | |
| Chitosan/ | 10–30 | BS | – | the prepared film has more wound healing property | [ | |
| Chitosan | 43–55 |
| BS, BC | MIC 4.5 ± 1.5 µg/mL, MBC 19 ± 3 µg/mL for UCLA 8076; | nanocomposites exhibit higher antibacterial activity than any component acting alone | [ |
| Polyester (PES) and polyamide (PA) fibers | 10 | BS | – | corona-treated PES and PA fibers supplemented by silver NPs exhibited more pronounced antibacterial effect in comparison with fibers without NPs | [ | |
| Polyurethane (PU) + Ag NPs | ∼5 |
| BS | – | PU–Ag 30 ppm had the maximum bacteriostatic effect | [ |
| Epoxy/ | 5–20 | BS | – | Antibacterial activity against all tested strains | [ | |
| Ag-doped poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) fibers | - | BS | – | antibacterial activities against | [ | |
| poly-N-isopropylacrylamide (pNIPAM) | 1–10 | BS | – | significant bacteriostatic activity against gram-negative | [ | |
| Chitosan | 1–50 | BS | MIC 1.56 µg/mL for | nanocomposites exhibited bacteriostatic activity, but did not exhibit antifungal activity | [ | |
| composite resins containing 1% | 20 | BS | – | composite resins containing zinc oxide and silver nanoparticles can significantly inhibit the growth of two important microorganisms in the oral cavity: | [ |
*—BS—bacteriostatic, BC—bactericidal; **—R—references.