| Literature DB >> 35057191 |
Roberto Scaffaro1, Maria Clara Citarrella1, Emmanuel Fortunato Gulino1, Marco Morreale2.
Abstract
In this work, an innovative green composite was produced by adding Hedysarum coronarium (HC) flour to a starch-based biodegradable polymer (Mater-Bi®, MB). The flour was obtained by grinding together stems, leaves and flowers and subsequently sieving it, selecting a fraction from 75 μm to 300 μm. Four formulations have been produced by compression molding (CM) and fused deposition modeling (FDM) by adding 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% of HC to MB. The influence of filler content on the processability was tested, and rheological, morphological and mechanical properties of composites were also assessed. Through CM, it was possible to obtain easily homogeneous samples with all filler amounts. Concerning FDM, 5% and 10% HC-filled composites proved also easily printable. Mechanical results showed filler effectively acted as reinforcement: Young's modulus and tensile strengths of the composites increased from 74.3 MPa to 236 MPa and from 18.6 MPa to 33.4 MPa, respectively, when 20% of HC was added to the pure matrix. FDM samples, moreover, showed higher mechanical properties if compared with CM ones due to rectilinear infill and fibers orientation. In fact, regarding the 10% HC composites, Young's modulus of the CM and FDM ones displayed a relative increment of 176% and 224%, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; FDM; Mater-Bi; additive manufacturing; biocomposites; biopolymers; green composites; natural filler
Year: 2022 PMID: 35057191 PMCID: PMC8778031 DOI: 10.3390/ma15020465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
FDM process parameters.
| FDM Operating Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Nozzle temperature | 160 °C |
| Bed temperature | 60 °C |
| Infill rate | 100% |
| Infill pattern | Rectilinear |
| Raster angle | 0° |
| Layer thickness | 0.1 mm |
| Extrusion width | 0.4 mm |
| Printing speed | 50 mm/s |
| Perimeter shells | 1 |
| Sample Orientation | flat |
Formulation of investigated samples.
| Sample Code Name | MB Content (wt%) | HC Content (wt%) | HC Mesh Size (μm) | Production Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM_MB | 100 | 0 | - | CM |
| CM_MB/HC5 | 95 | 5 | 300 < 75 | CM |
| CM_MB/HC10 | 90 | 10 | 300 < 75 | CM |
| CM_MB/HC15 | 85 | 15 | 300 < 75 | CM |
| CM_MB/HC20 | 80 | 20 | 300 < 75 | CM |
| FDM_MB | 100 | 0 | - | FDM |
| FDM_MB/HC5 | 95 | 5 | 300 < 75 | FDM |
| FDM_MB/HC10 | 90 | 10 | 300 < 75 | FDM |
| FDM_MB/HC15 | 85 | 15 | 300 < 75 | FDM |
Figure 1FDM- and CM-obtained samples.
Figure 2Complex viscosity of pure MB and its HC composites.
Figure 3Optical image (a) and SEM micrograph (b) of HC powder.
Figure 4SEM micrograph of fractured cross-sections of CM_MB/HC5 (a), CM_MB/HC10 (b), CM_MB/HC15 (c) and CM_MB/HC20 (d). Red circles highlight poor filler wettability parts.
Elastic modulus (E), tensile strength (TS) and elongation at break (EB) of sample obtained by compression molding and FDM.
| Sample | E (MPa) | TS (MPa) | EB (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CM_MB | 74.3 ± 0.84 | 18.6 ± 0.5 | 821 ± 1.8 |
| CM_MB/HC5 | 121 ± 11.3 | 23.7 ± 2.33 | 43.6 ± 3.39 |
| CM_MB/HC10 | 131 ± 8 | 24.5 ± 2.16 | 39.8 ± 2.75 |
| CM_MB/HC15 | 145 ± 12 | 27.2 ± 0.88 | 24 ± 0.88 |
| CM_MB/HC20 | 236 ± 8.49 | 33.4 ± 0.29 | 20.3 ± 0.37 |
| FDM_MB | 83.9 ± 1.34 | 27.2 ± 0.16 | 58.2 ± 0.75 |
| FDM_MB/HC5 | 166 ± 8.8 | 41.5 ± 1.39 | 42.3 ± 4.19 |
| FDM_MB/HC10 | 188 ± 1.54 | 45 ± 1.36 | 34.6 ± 0.82 |
| FDM_MB/HC15 | - | - | - |
| FDM_MB/HC20 | - | - | - |
Figure 5SEM micrograph of fractured cross-sections of FDM_MB/HC5 (a); FDM_MB/HC10 (b).