| Literature DB >> 29997365 |
Gianluca Cicala1,2, Davide Giordano3,4, Claudio Tosto5,6, Giovanni Filippone7,8, Antonino Recca9,10, Ignazio Blanco11,12.
Abstract
Three commercial filaments for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) were selected to study the influence of polymer formulation on the printing quality and mechanical properties of FDM specimens. The three filaments were all based on polylactic acid (PLA) as the matrix, and they are sold as PLA filaments. The printing quality was tested by printing one complex shape with overhang features. The marked shear thinning behavior for two filaments was observed by rheology. The filaments were also studied by scanning electron microscopy and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) to unveil their composition. The filaments with the best printing quality showed the presence of mineral fillers, which explained the melt behavior observed by rheology. The tensile testing confirmed that the filled PLA was the best-performing filament both in terms of printing quality and thermomechanical performance, with a p-value = 0.106 for the tensile modulus, and a p-value = 0.615 for the ultimate tensile strength.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; PLA; additive manufacturing; fused deposition modeling; mechanical properties; rheology; thermal properties
Year: 2018 PMID: 29997365 PMCID: PMC6073186 DOI: 10.3390/ma11071191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Cartoon showing the Yoda sample while printing.
Printing conditions for the preparation of the specimens.
| Specimen | Speed | In Fill | In Fill Type | Raster Angle | Nozzle T | Bed T | Layer Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoda | 35–45 | 10 | Grid | 210 | 50 | 120 | |
| Tensile tests | 35–45 | 100 | 0/90 | 210 | 50 | 120 |
Figure 2Some examples of the overhang printing defects due to uncontrolled flow of the polymer: the white Yoda shows no defect (a,c); the green Yoda showed printing defects in the critical area such as ears and the chin (b,d).
Figure 3(a) Shear (circles) and complex (triangles) viscosity for white (open symbols) and green (full symbols) polylactide (PLA). (b) Elastic (circles) and viscous (triangles) modulus for white (open symbols) and green (full symbols) PLA.
Figure 4Scanning electron microscope of the white PLA filament. Red arrows mark some of the inorganic fillers (magnification 2.5kX).
Figure 5Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of the three PLA commercial samples.
Glass transition temperature (Tg), crystallization temperature (Tc), melting temperature (Tm), temperature at 5% mass loss (T5%), and residue % at 600 °C of the investigated samples.
| Filament | Residue [%] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 58.6 | 86.2 | 170.0 | 334.3 | 10.7 |
|
| 59.9 | 85.6 | 168.6 | 311.7 | 10.8 |
|
| 63.9 | 106.8 | 148.2 | 303.5 | 0 |
Figure 6Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the solid residue at 600 °C from the degradation of the white sample.
Figure 7Differential thermal analysis (DTA) curves of the three PLA commercial samples.
Figure 8Printed tensile specimens: (a) surface quality; (b) tensile fractured surface; (c) SEM analysis of the tensile fractured white specimen.
Ultimate tensile strength and Young modulus for the printed samples.
| Filament | Ultimate Tensile Strength [MPa] | Young Modulus [GPa] |
|---|---|---|
|
| 32.12 ± 3.80 | 3.40 ± 0.14 |
|
| 34.43 ± 3.38 | 3.73 ± 0.14 |
|
| 28.37 ± 1.46 | 2.66 ± 0.11 |
Figure 9Cryofactured surface for the tensile specimens: (a) green; (b) black (magnification 50X).
Figure 10Tensile fractured surface for the black specimens (magnification 3000×).