| Literature DB >> 35056651 |
Champa Wijekoon1,2, Thomas Netticadan1,2,3, Yaw L Siow1,2,3, Ali Sabra1,2, Liping Yu1,2, Pema Raj1,2, Suvira Prashar1,2.
Abstract
Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) are rich in bioactive molecules contributing to health benefits. Consumption of grapes is linked to reduced incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Studies on table grape cultivars are limited although much attention in research was focused on the wine industry. Bioactive effects of grapes as anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, cardioprotective, vasorelaxant, phytoestrogenic and neuroprotective have also been reported. For example, resveratrol is a natural food ingredient present in grapes, with high antioxidant potential. Here we conducted an exploratory study to investigate bioactive molecules, antioxidant activity and the association between constitutive stilbene synthase (STS) gene expression and the resveratrol biosynthesis in selected table grape varieties in North America. The phenolic compounds, fatty acid composition and antioxidant activity of four grape varieties were compared. Red Globe variety was rich in unsaturated fatty acids as well as phenolic compounds such as caffeic acid, quercetin and resveratrol. Meanwhile, the constitutive expression of grape stilbene synthase gene was higher in Flame and Autumn Royal where resveratrol content of these cultivars was relatively low compared to the Red Globe variety. This study shows the potential links in grape antioxidant activity and resveratrol production, but more studies are necessary to show the association.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; bioactive molecules; grapes; resveratrol; stilbene synthase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35056651 PMCID: PMC8780478 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27020336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Schematic representation of the methods used in this study. Commercial table grape varieties tested from the Winnipeg market are (A) Flame, (B) Autumn Royal, (C) Sweet Scarlet and (D) Red Globe. Bioactive composition was analyzed using HPLC and GC/MS. Antioxidant activity was determined for all 4 varieties. Constitutive stilbene synthase gene expression on resveratrol production was also studied using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) method.
Phenolic compounds content (µg/g dry weight) identified and quantified in the whole freeze-dried grape varieties using HPLC.
| Compound | Chemical Group | Flame (Seedless) | Autumn Royal (Seedless) | Sweet Scarlet (Seedless) | Red Globe (Pitted) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caftaric acid | Cinnamic acid derivatives | 48.5 ± 8.30 b | 95.8 ± 22.1 a | 19.6 ± 1.67 b | 54.7 ± 8.80 b |
| Chlorogenic acid | 3.88 ± 0.31 a | 3.64 ± 0.53 a | 5.06 ± 0.82 a | 6.24 ± 1.31 a | |
| Caffeic acid | 10.6 ± 3.22 bc | 5.49 ± 1.69 c | 16.7 ± 1.47 ab | 20.2 ± 3.61 a | |
| 1.64 ± 0.13 a | 1.98 ± 0.11 a | 1.74 ± 0.32 a | 1.98 ± 0.08 a | ||
| Ferulic acid | 4.88 ± 0.48 b | 4.83 ± 1.09 b | 11.1 ± 0.61 a | 6.07 ± 0.93 b | |
| Total | 69.5 | 111.7 | 54.2 | 89.2 | |
| Protocatechuic acid | Hydroxybenzoic acid | 18.5 ± 0.43 b | 33.9 ± 2.21 a | 36.2 ± 5.89 a | 31.9 ± 5.71 a |
| Total | 18.5 | 33.9 | 36.2 | 31.9 | |
| Catechin | Flavan-3-ols | 13.6 ± 0.87 b | 25.8 ± 3.22 b | 78.9 ± 9.76 a | 18.3 ± 2.74 b |
| Epicatechin | 8.94 ± 0.64 b | 13.9 ± 1.93 b | 41.1 ± 4.34 a | 7.40 ± 0.52 b | |
| Epigallocatechin | 0.89 ± 0.04 b | 2.33 ± 0.66 a | 0.73 ± 0.25 b | 0.20 ± 0.07 b | |
| Epicatechin gallate | 3.29 ± 0.17 bc | 12.5 ± 2.02 a | 0.74 ± 0.09 c | 7.65 ± 2.32 b | |
| Total | 26.7 | 54.5 | 121.5 | 33.6 | |
| Rutin | Flavonols | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Quercetin | 2.45 ± 0.05 b | 3.05 ± 0.18 b | 3.77 ± 0.46 b | 24.9 ± 2.55 a | |
| Iso-quercetin | 4.02 ± 0.94 b | 26.4 ± 3.17 a | 26.8 ± 0.80 a | 6.49 ± 0.48 b | |
| Myricetin | ˂LOD | 22.2 ± 2.07 b | 4.72 ± 0.59 c | 54.2 ± 10.2 a | |
| Kaempferol | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Genistein | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Total | 6.47 | 51.7 | 35.3 | 85.6 | |
| Apiginin | Flavones | ND | 3.27 ± 0.56 b | 2.78 ± 0.22 b | 19.7 ± 3.26 a |
| Total | - | 3.27 | 2.78 | 19.7 | |
| Resveratrol | Stilbenes | 3.30 ± 0.81 b | 7.23 ± 2.42 b | 7.30 ± 2.11 b | 13.9 ± 2.87 a |
| Total | 3.30 | 7.23 | 7.30 | 13.9 | |
| Delphinidin chloride | Anthocyanins | 5.79 ± 0.51 d | 53.1 ± 10.9 c | 96.4 ± 6.16 b | 139.6 ± 7.27 a |
| Cyanidin glucoside | 4.32 ± 1.68 b | ˂LOD | 16.8 ± 4.09 b | 39.3 ± 7.62 a | |
| Pelargonidin chloride | ˂LOD | 9.11 ± 0.46 a | 1.43 ± 0.14 b | 1.06 ± 0.22 b | |
| Petunidin 3- | 0.73 ± 0.08 c | 11.1 ± 1.30 a | 2.51 ± 0.25 c | 5.38 ± 0.68 b | |
| Delphinidin 3- | 4.50 ± 0.34 c | 11.3 ± 0.10 a | 4.47 ± 0.20 c | 5.58 ± 0.64 b | |
| Total | 15.3 | 84.6 | 121.6 | 190.9 |
Innamic acid derivatives quantified at 325 nm; Hydroxybenzoic acids, Flavan-3-ols, Flavonols, and Flavones at 205 nm; Stilbenes at 306 nm; Anthocyanins at 520 nm; ND: Not detected; LOD: below limit of detection. Values associated with different letters in the same row are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 using Tukey HSD test.
Figure 2Chromatograms obtained from HPLC and GC/MS. (A) Chromatogram of phenolic compounds identified in Red globe grape extract at 280 nm. (B) HPLC chromatogram of a mix of phenolic compound standards detected at 280 nm. Rt 7.8 Protocatechuic acid; Rt10.7 Catechin; Rt 11.78 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid; Rt 13.197 Vanillic acid; Rt 13.693 Epicatechin; Rt 14.830 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid; Rt 17.927 Vanillin; Rt 18.850 p-Coumaric acid + syringaldehyde; Rt 20.10 Ferulic acid; Rt 22.8 Benzoic acid; Rt 24.7 Salicylic acid; Rt 26.7 Genistein. (C) GC/MS total ion chromatogram of the fatty acid methyl esters extracted from the grape varieties (Flame, Autumn Royal, Sweet Scarlet, Red Globe pitted, and seeds).
Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) content (µg/g fresh weight) in grape varieties (flame, autumn royal, sweet scarlet, red globe pitted, and red globe seeds) using GCMS.
| Fatty Acid Methyl Ester/Volatile Compound | Flame (Seedless) | Autumn Royal (Seedless) | Sweet Scarlet (SEEDLESS) | Red globe (Pitted) | Red Globe Seeds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methyl myristate C14:0 | 3.09 ± 0.49 d | 6.88 ± 1.64 bc | 8.43 ± 1.04 ab | 4.16 ± 0.08 cd | 10.1 ± 0.68 a |
| Methyl pentadecanoate C15:0 | 1.07 ± 0.26 b | 1.79 ± 0.15 b | 1.79 ± 0.20 ab | 1.07 ± 0.10 b | 2.66 ± 0.53 a |
| Methyl palmitate C16:0 | 188 ± 25.0 c | 321 ± 28.5 b | 337 ± 38.0 b | 307 ± 3.12 b | 720 ± 41.8 a |
| Methyl palmitoleate C16:1 | 3.25 ± 0.43 b | 0.84 ± 0.16 c | 2.56 ± 0.53 b | 3.31 ± 0.08 b | 11.1 ± 0.93 a |
| Methyl stearate C18:0 | 17.3 ± 1.83 c | 46.6 ± 1.75 bc | 74.9 ± 9.30 b | 39.5 ± 0.94 bc | 257 ± 30.0 a |
| Methyl elaidate C18:1 trans | 44.1 ± 1.74 c | 47.1 ± 8.89 c | 44.8 ± 6.65 c | 361 ± 19.8 b | 868 ± 114 a |
| Methyl oleate C18:1 cis | 4.17 ± 0.68 c | 8.68 ± 1.43 bc | 14.2 ± 1.12 b | 13.1 ± 0.60 b | 28.4 ± 3.9 a |
| Methyl linoleate C18:2 | 323 ± 22.0 b | 580 ± 53.1 b | 859 ± 33.4 b | 584 ± 28.3 b | 4493 ± 674 a |
| Methyl arachidate C20:0 | 11.4 ± 0.54 d | 20.4 ± 0.70 b | 45.7 ± 0.49 a | 20.8 ± 0.52 b | 13.5 ± 0.26 c |
| Methyl α linolenate C18:3 | 139 ± 24.2 c | 305 ± 13.2 a | 248 ± 24.8 b | 273 ± 19.4 ab | 65.3 ± 2.68 d |
| Methyl behenate C22:0 | 17.7 ± 0.78 c | 28.6 ± 3.04 b | 33.3 ± 5.81 b | 48.1 ± 3.11 a | 14.0 ± 0.41 c |
| Methyl tricosanoate C23:0 | 2.43 ± 0.45 c | 20.5 ± 2.00 b | 3.24 ± 0.85 c | 26.2 ± 3.51 a | 1.17 ± 0.27 c |
| Methyl lignocerate C24:0 | 10.0 ± 1.99 bc | 10.5 ± 1.33 bc | 17.4 ± 2.37 b | 65.4 ± 5.26 a | 6.78 ± 0.54 c |
| Hexacosanoic acid C26:0 | 26.4 ± 4.72 a | 15.4 ± 2.50 b | 23.6 ± 3.30 ab | 32.6 ± 2.71 a | 16.2 ± 2.80 b |
| Hepta 2,4 dienoic acid | 24.3 ± 3.59 bc | 12.8 ± 2.17 d | 34.1 ± 2.17 a | 31.3 ± 0.04 ab | 18.4 ± 3.42 cd |
| Stearaldehyde, dimethyl acetal | 22.6 ± 1.46 c | 39.8 ± 6.27 b | 19.8 ± 3.93 c | 70.6 ± 8.08 a | ND |
| Saturated | 277.4 | 471.7 | 545.4 | 544.8 | 1041.4 |
| Unsaturated | 513.5 | 941.6 | 1168.6 | 1234.4 | 5465.8 |
| Ratio USFA/SFA | 1.85 | 2.00 | 2.14 | 2.27 | 5.25 |
| other | 46.9 | 52.6 | 53.9 | 101.9 | 18.4 |
Values associated with different letters in the same row are significantly different at p ≤ 0.5 using Tukey HSD test.
Figure 3The antioxidant activity of the four grape varieties, Flame, Autumn Royal, Sweet Scarlet (seedless), Red Globe (pitted) and seeds. All the tested grape varieties including their seeds showed high antioxidant activity assay without significant changes from each other. The results are expressed as SE ± (n = 3).
Figure 4Stilbene synthase (STS) gene expression analysis in tested four varieties of table grapes. (A). Amplified products of STS (137 bp) and beta-tubulin (86 bp) by PCR analysis. (B). Relative expression of STS gene in different varieties of table grapes found in Winnipeg market. (The results are expressed as SE ± (n = 3). When compared to Sweet Scarlet significant interactions are shown with # p < 0.005, * p < 0.0005).