| Literature DB >> 35055539 |
Rui Zhou1, Ying-Jing Zheng1, Jing-Yi Yun1, Hong-Mei Wang1.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess the impacts of urban green space on depressive symptoms among Chinese urban residents aged 45 and older. In total, 7397 urban respondents were included in this study. Each respondent participated in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study Wave 3 (2015). Environmental-level variables were retrieved from the National Bureau of Statistics database. Both unadjusted and adjusted methods were used in the multilevel regression analysis. Almost one-third of the sample population suffered from depressive symptoms (31.20%). The multilevel logistic regression model showed that green coverage ratio of city-built districts is negatively associated with the prevalence of depressive symptoms among urban mid-aged (OR = 0.79, p < 0.05) and elderly (OR = 0.75, p < 0.05) residents, and the public recreational green space helps to reduce elderly people's depressive symptoms (OR = 0.77, p < 0.05). This study adds insights about the impact of green space and other environmental factors on depressive symptoms among mid-aged and elderly urban dwellers. It is important to provide enough and accessible overall urban green spaces; additionally, attention should also be paid to specific green space forms such as public recreational green space.Entities:
Keywords: China; depression; green space; mid-aged and elderly
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35055539 PMCID: PMC8775628 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Descriptive statistics of urban green space indicators.
| Category | Per Capita Public Recreational Green Space (m2/person) | Green Coverage Area in Built Up Area of City (hectare/Km2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Min | Max | Mean (SD) | Min | Max | |
| Low Level | 11.45 (±2.12) | 6.98 | 14.90 | 33.35 (±4.48) | 18.14 | 37.67 |
| Medium Level | 17.27 (±1.48) | 15.07 | 19.85 | 40.12 (±1.18) | 38.03 | 42.95 |
| High Level | 25.53 (±5.50) | 21.82 | 38.11 | 45.82 (±2.55) | 43.33 | 52.02 |
| Total | 13.52 (±4.50) | 6.98 | 38.11 | 39.78 (±4.76) | 18.14 | 52.02 |
Study sample characteristics.
| Variables | Category |
| % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 45–60 | 3814 | 51.56 |
| ≥60 | 3583 | 48.44 | |
| Gender | Male | 3603 | 48.71 |
| Female | 3794 | 51.29 | |
| Marital Status | Married and Cohabitated | 6433 | 86.97 |
| Otherwise | 964 | 13.03 | |
| Education level | Primary education or below | 3599 | 48.65 |
| Middle school | 2135 | 28.86 | |
| Senior high school | 1197 | 16.18 | |
| Associate degree or above | 466 | 6.30 | |
| Work | Yes | 5630 | 76.11 |
| No | 1767 | 23.89 | |
| Co-morbidity | No disease | 3528 | 47.70 |
| Only one disease | 1753 | 23.70 | |
| ≥two diseases | 2116 | 28.61 | |
| Physical function damage | Yes | 1577 | 21.32 |
| No | 5820 | 78.68 | |
| Participation of outdoor activity | Yes | 912 | 12.33 |
| No | 6485 | 87.67 | |
| City Type | Municipality Directly under the Central Government | 280 | 3.79 |
| Vice-provincial City | 769 | 10.40 | |
| Prefecture-level City | 5956 | 80.52 | |
| County-level City | 392 | 5.30 | |
| Community city GDP (billion RMB) | <500 | 5521 | 74.64 |
| 500–1000 | 1146 | 15.49 | |
| ≥1000 | 730 | 9.87 | |
| Population density (persons/Km2) | <2500 | 5118 | 69.19 |
| 2500–5000 | 1985 | 26.84 | |
| ≥5000 | 294 | 3.97 |
ORs (95% CI) of depressive symptoms in relation to individual and environmental factors by age group (N = 7396).
| Variables | Category | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-Age Group | Elderly Group | ||
| Gender | Male | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Female | 2.024 (1.758, 2.330) *** | 1.744 (1.511, 2.013) *** | |
| Marital status | Married and Cohabitated | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Separated, Divorced, Widowed, and Never married | 1.496 (1.144, 1.956) ** | 1.144 (0.962, 1.360) | |
| Education level | Primary education or below | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Middle school | 0.790 (0.673, 0.927) * | 0.826 (0.690, 0.989) * | |
| Senior high school | 0.666 (0.550, 0.807) *** | 0.627 (0.489, 0.804) *** | |
| Associate degree or above | 0.422 (0.310, 0.575) *** | 0.631 (0.437, 0.910) * | |
| Work | Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | 0.916 (0.734, 1.143) | 0.671 (0.578, 0.780) *** | |
| Co-morbidity | No disease | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Only one disease | 1.354 (1.142, 1.607) *** | 1.281 (1.060, 1.548) * | |
| ≥two diseases | 1.624 (1.363, 1.935) *** | 1.883 (1.595, 2.223) *** | |
| Physical function damage | Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | 0.354 (0.288, 0.434) *** | 0.478 (0.412, 0.554) *** | |
| Participation of outdoor activity | Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | 0.936 (0.765, 1.146) | 1.045 (0.838, 1.304) | |
| City type | Municipality Directly under the Central Government | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Vice-provincial City | 0.705 (0.460, 1.082) | 1.253 (0.794, 1.976) | |
| Prefecture-level City | 0.952 (0.657, 1.380) | 1.732 (1.161, 2.853) ** | |
| County-level City | 1.342 (0.853, 2.112) | 1.660 (1.001, 2.754) * | |
| Community city GDP (Billion RMB) | <500 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 500-1000 | 0.636 (0.516, 0.784) *** | 0.514 (0.414, 0.638) *** | |
| ≥1000 | 0.916 (0.724, 1.159) | 0.749 (0.588, 0.955) * | |
| Population density (persons/ Km2) | <2500 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 2500-5000 | 1.086 (0.921, 1.086) | 1.006 (0.848, 1.195) | |
| ≥5000 | 0.903 (0.763, 1.068) | 1.089 (0.918, 1.290) | |
* p < 0.05; ** p <0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Results of multilevel logistic models of depressive symptoms by age group.
| Variables | Category | Unadjusted Model | Adjusted Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Mode 3 (a) | Model 3 (b) | |||
| Mid-Aged Group | ||||||
| Per capita public recreational green space (m2/person) | Low Level | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Medium Level | 0.99 (0.76, 1.29) | 1.01(0.78, 1.31) | 1.04 (0.81, 1.34) | 0.99 (0.77, 1.27) | 1.17 (0.84, 1.61) | |
| High Level | 1.08 (0.72, 1.63) | 1.07(0.72, 1.59) | 1.05 (0.72, 1.54) | 1.07 (0.73, 1.55) | 1.39 (0.84, 2.29) | |
| Green coverage area in built up area of city (hectare/Km2) | Low Level | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Medium Level | 0.74 (0.58, 0.95) * | 0.73 (0.57, 0.93) * | 0.73 (0.58, 0.92) ** | 0.79 (0.62, 0.99) * | 0.83 (0.65, 1.06) | |
| High Level | 0.78 (0.57, 1.07) | 0.79 (0.58, 1.08) | 0.79 (0.59, 1.06) | 0.86 (0.64, 1.15) | 1.02 (0.71, 1.46) | |
| AIC | 4687.427 | 4572.72 | 4503.146 | 4500.684 | 4502.782 | |
| Variables | Category | Elderly group | ||||
| Per capita public recreational green space (m2/person) | Low Level | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Medium Level | 0.78 (0.59, 1.01) | 0.76 (0.59, 0.99) * | 0.77 (0.59, 0.99) * | 0.77 (0.61, 0.99) * | 0.82 (0.58, 1.15) | |
| High Level | 1.40 (0.92, 2.15) | 1.33 (0.88, 2.03) | 1.23 (0.81, 1.85) | 1.16 (0.79, 1.71) | 1.25 (0.74, 2.09) | |
| Green coverage area in built up area of city (hectare/Km2) | Low Level | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Medium Level | 0.67 (0.53, 0.86) ** | 0.66 (0.52, 0.84) ** | 0.70 (0.56, 0.89) ** | 0.75 (0.60, 0.94) * | 0.76 (0.60, 0.96) * | |
| High Level | 0.67 (0.49, 0.92) * | 0.67 (0.49, 0.92) * | 0.71 (0.52, 0.97) * | 0.75 (0.57, 0.99) * | 0.77 (0.55, 1.09) | |
| AIC | 4419.798 | 4356.739 | 4266.486 | 4255.97 | 4257.827 | |
Model 1: adjusted for demographic factors (i.e., gender, marital status, education level and work); Model 2: adjusted for model 1 + health-related factors (i.e., comorbidity, physical function, and outdoor activities); Model 3 (a): adjusted for model 2 + environmental control factors (i.e., city type, city GDP, population density); Model 3 (b): adjusted for Model 3 (a) + interaction of per capita public recreational green space and green coverage area in built up area of city, both interaction variable were not significant, p mid-aged = 0.124 > 0.05, p elderly = 0.706 > 0.05; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.