| Literature DB >> 35055483 |
Ana C Gomes Rosa1, Elaine S de Pádua Melo1, Ademir S A Junior1, Jacqueline M S Gondim1, Alexsandro G de Sousa2, Claudia A L Cardoso3, Lucilene F Viana4, Alexandra M A Carvalho5, David J Machate6, Valter Aragão do Nascimento1.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to investigate metal(loid)s in soils, in the trunk xylem sap and in the leaves of the Dipteryx alata plant located near the highway with high vehicle traffic in agricultural regions and near landfills, and to assess the transfer of metal(loid)s from soil to plant and possible health risk assessment. Trunk xylem sap, leaves and soil samples were collected at three sites near the highway. The analysis of trace elements was carried out using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP OES). In the three soil sampling sites far from the highway edge, 15 elements were quantified. The concentrations of elements in the soil presented in greater proportions in the distance of 5 m in relation to 20 and 35 m. The metal(loid)s content in the study soil was higher than in other countries. The concentrations of Al, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, P, Se and Zn in the xylem sap were much higher than the leaves. The values of transfer factor of P, Mg and Mn from soil to the xylem sap and transfer factor of P from soil to leaf were greater than 1, indicating that the specie have a significant phytoremediation and phytoextraction potential. This plant has a tendency to accumulate As, Cd and Cr in its leaf tissues. The chronic hazard index (HI) values recorded in this study were above 1 for adults and adolescents. It is concluded that the soil, the trunk xylem sap and leaves of this plant are contaminated by heavy metals. Ingestion of the trunk xylem sap of this plant can cause toxicity in humans if ingested in large quantities and in the long term; therefore, its consumption should be avoided.Entities:
Keywords: Dipteryx alata Vog; health effects; highway; landfill; medicinal plants; metal(loid)s; trunk xylem sap; vehicular traffic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35055483 PMCID: PMC8775485 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Schematic drawing of the sampling location—trees 1, 2 and 3 (plant samples and distance from the highway D = 5, 20 and 35 m), the three parallel lines (soil sample) from both sides of the MS-40 highway, and surroundings (river, landfill and agricultural areas).
Figure 2(a) Location of trees 1 and 2 near highway edge. (b) Landfill near the highway and bean plantation (agriculture).
Concentrations of elements in soil (median and interquartile deviation) compared to Conama/Brazil [43], soil in China and USA [44].
| Element | Concentrations of Elements in Soil: | Conama/Brazil | China | USA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 m | 20 m | 35 m | ||||
| Al | 79.56|6.35 a | 54.65|1.87 a | 54.44|1.50 a | * | 6.4 | 4.7 |
| As | 20.85|0.71 a | 15.84|0.75 b | 14.10|0.94 b | 15 | 9.2 | 5.2 |
| Cd | 24.26|1.16 a | 16.06|0.91 b | 12.88|0.88 b | 1.3 | 0.07 | *** |
| Co | 15.12|0.20 a | 13.27|0.22 b | 12.09|0.12 b | 35 | 11 | 6.7 |
| Cr | 28.47|0.46 a | 20.28|0.44 b | 18.11|0.18 b | * | 54 | 37 |
| Cu | 160.33|0.88 a | 73.16|0.48 b | 70.65|0.56 b | 200 | 20 | 17 |
| Fe | 188.00|0.88 a | 183.76|6.03 a | 152.30|0.27 a | * | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| Mg | 230.01|0.50 a | 220.81|0.51 b | 209.40|0.17 b | * | 0.67 | 0.44 |
| Mn | 118.10|0.13 a | 45.17|0.27 b | 42.24|0.24 b | * | 432 | 333 |
| Mo | 45.42|0.28 a | 28.16|0.56 b | 18.64|1.35 b | 30 | 1.2 | 0.59 |
| Ni | 49.86|0.54 a | 40.22|0.29 b | 35.64|0.50 b | 30 | 23 | 13 |
| P | 20.57|0.58 a | 18.60|0.58 b | 15.54|0.70 b | * | ** | 0.02 |
| Se | 14.10|0.87 a | 13.00|0.02 b | 12.14|0.18 b | * | 0.22 | 0.26 |
| Zn | 178.85|1.27 a | 165.40|0.12 b | 150.28|0.07 b | 300 | 67 | 48 |
| Pb | 12.44|0.51 a | 7.08|1.33 b | 5.64|0.45 b | 72 | 24 | 16 |
“a” and “b” mean statistically significant difference; * Values not determined by Conama/Brazil; ** Values not determined by China; *** Values not determined by USA.
Concentrations of elements in trunk xylem sap and leaves of D. alata.
| Elements | Trunk Xylem Sap | Leaves |
|---|---|---|
| Al | 21.40 ± 0.20 | 3.86 ± 0.39 |
| As | <LOD | 0.06 ± 0.07 |
| Cd | <LOD | 0.42 ± 0.10 |
| Co | <LOD | <LOD |
| Cr | <LOD | 0.34 ± 0.16 |
| Cu | 0.60 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.05 |
| Fe | 6.60 ± 0.30 | 6.50 ± 0.52 |
| Mg | 341.00 ± 2.40 | 31.89 ± 1.19 |
| Mn | 52.20 ± 0.50 | 5.51 ± 0.24 |
| Mo | <LOD | <LOD |
| Ni | <LOD | <LOD |
| P | 266.90 ± 0.40 | 41.07 ± 0.16 |
| Se | 8.30 ± 0.40 | 0.29 ± 0.14 |
| V | <LOD | <LOD |
| Zn | 1.40 ± 0.10 | 0.44 ± 0.03 |
Figure 3Hierarchical clustering of the means of each metal(loid)s of the soil samples at distances of 5, 20 and 35 m.
Figure 4Principal component analysis (PCA) of each metal(loid) of the soil samples at distances of 5, 20 and 35 m.
Transfer factor of chemical elements in soils collected at three distances from the sampling sites from highway edge (D1, D2 and D3) to the trunk xylem sap.
| Element | Transfer Factor of Concentrations of Elements in Soil to Trunk Xylem Sap of the Plant | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distances from the Sampling Sites to Highway Edge | |||
| 5 m | 20 m | 35 m | |
| Al | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.40 |
| Cu | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Fe | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Mg | 1.48 | 1.54 | 1.63 |
| Mn | 0.44 | 1.15 | 1.23 |
| P | 12.97 | 14.35 | 17.17 |
| Se | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.68 |
| Zn | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Transfer factor of chemical elements in soils collected at three distances from the sampling sites from highway edge (D1, D2 and D3) to plant leaves.
| Element | Transfer Factor of Concentrations of Elements in Soil to Leaves of the Plant | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distances from the Sampling Sites to Highway Edge | |||
| 5 m | 20 m | 35 m | |
| Al | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| As | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cd | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Cr | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Cu | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Fe | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Mg | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Mn | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| P | 1.99 | 2.20 | 2.64 |
| Se | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Zn | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Estimated daily intake (EDI) of each element via consumption of trunk xylem sap of the tree compared to Upper level of tolerable intake (UL) [35].
| Elements | Adults (Female/Male) | Adolescents (Female/Male) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated Daily Intake (mg/kg/day) | Upper Level of Tolerable Intake (UL) | Estimated Daily Intake (mg/kg/day) | Upper Level of Tolerable Intake (UL) | |
| Al | 0.07 ± 7.1 × 10−4 | ND | 0.03 ± 2.5 × 10−4 | ND |
| Cu | 2.14 × 10−3 ± 3.5 × 10−5 | 10 | 7.5 × 10−4 ± 1.0 × 10−5 | 5 |
| Fe | 0.02 ± 0.011 | 45 | 8.25 × 10−3 ± 0.04 | 40 |
| Mg | 1.28 ± 8.57 × 10−3 | 350 | 0.43 ± 3.0 × 10−3 | 350 |
| Mn | 0.18 ± 1.78 × 10−3 | 11 | 0.06 ± 6.25 × 10−4 | 6 |
| P | 0.95 ± 1.42 × 10−3 | 4000 | 0.3 ± 5.0 × 10−4 | 4000 |
| Se | 0.03 ± 1.42 × 10−3 | 0.4 | 0.01 ± 5.0 × 10−4 | 0.28 |
| Zn | 5.0 × 10−3 ± 3.5 × 10−4 | 40 | 1.75 × 10−3 ± 1.25 × 10−4 | 23 |
Target hazard quotient (HQ) due to consumption of trunk xylem sap of the tree by adults and children and chronic hazard index (HI).
| Elements | Adults 50 Years (70 kg) | Children |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Al | 1.88 × 10−2 ± 1.80 × 10−4 | 6.59 × 10−3 ± 6.16 × 10−5 |
| Cu | 0.01 ± 2.15 × 10−4 | 4.4 × 10−3 ± 7.3 × 10−5 |
| Fe | 8.27 × 10−3 ± 3.76 × 10−3 | 2.9 × 10−3 ± 1.3 × 10−3 |
| Mg | 0.03 ± 1.92 × 10−4 | 9.55 × 10−3 ± 6.72 × 10−5 |
| Mn | 1.91 ± 0.0182 | 0.68 ± 6.42 × 10−3 |
| P | 11,751.90 ± 17.50 | 4105.47 ± 6.16 |
| Se | 1.43 ± 0.07 | 0.507 ± 0.024 |
| Zn | 4.10 × 10−3 ± 2.93 × 10−4 | 1.43 × 10−3 ± 1.02 × 10−4 |
|
| 11,755.31 ± 17.59 | 4106.60 ± 6.19 |