| Literature DB >> 24723928 |
Ana Alvarez-Fernández1, Pablo Díaz-Benito1, Anunciación Abadía1, Ana-Flor López-Millán1, Javier Abadía1.
Abstract
The mechanisms plants use to transport metals from roots to shoots are not completely understood. It has long been proposed that organic molecules participate in metal translocation within the plant. However, until recently the identity of the complexes involved in the long-distance transport of metals could only be inferred by using indirect methods, such as analyzing separately the concentrations of metals and putative ligands and then using in silico chemical speciation software to predict metal species. Molecular biology approaches also have provided a breadth of information about putative metal ligands and metal complexes occurring in plant fluids. The new advances in analytical techniques based on mass spectrometry and the increased use of synchrotron X-ray spectroscopy have allowed for the identification of some metal-ligand species in plant fluids such as the xylem and phloem saps. Also, some proteins present in plant fluids can bind metals and a few studies have explored this possibility. This study reviews the analytical challenges researchers have to face to understand long-distance metal transport in plants as well as the recent advances in the identification of the ligand and metal-ligand complexes in plant fluids.Entities:
Keywords: metal complexes; metals; phloem; transport; xylem
Year: 2014 PMID: 24723928 PMCID: PMC3971170 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Metal concentrations (in μM) in xylem sap, leaf apoplastic fluid and phloem sap in different plant species.
| Ni | nd–1750 | Kerkeb and Krämer, | ||||||
| Ni | 1000 | Alves et al., | ||||||
| Cd | 486 | nd–100 | Ueno et al., | |||||
| 5 | Durrett et al., | |||||||
| Fe | 2 | López-Millán et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 2 | Larbi et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 4 | Orera et al., | ||||||
| Zn | 5–9 | 20–148 | Sagardoy, | |||||
| Cd | 5–11 | 20–26 | <0.1–10 | Sagardoy, | ||||
| Cu | 0.3–1 | Irtelli et al., | ||||||
| Ni | 175 | Kerkeb and Krämer, | ||||||
| Cd | nd–50 | Salt et al., | ||||||
| Cd | nd–61 | Wei et al., | ||||||
| Cd | 10–15 | 23–26 | 0.6–4 | 0.5–0.6 | nd–12 | Nakamura et al., | ||
| Cd | 0.7 | nd–11 | Mendoza-Cózatl et al., | |||||
| 11–80 | 9–70 | Shelp, | ||||||
| Fe | 2 | 8–58 | 2–5 | 5–20 | Alam et al., | |||
| Fe | nd–100 | Kawai et al., | ||||||
| 20 | 4 | 0.6 | 14 | Hocking, | ||||
| Zn | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3–28 | White et al., | |||
| 11 | 4 | 2 | 22 | Hocking, | ||||
| 8 | Yokosho et al., | |||||||
| Fe | 4G,S–6 | Yokosho et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 2 | Kakei et al., | ||||||
| Cu | 36 | 107 | 5–9 | 8–16 | Ando et al., | |||
| Cu | 0.2 | Deng et al., | ||||||
| 30 | 8–9 | nd | Ishimaru et al., | |||||
| Cd | 15 | 8 | 5 | Ishimaru et al., | ||||
| Cd | 40 | 12 | 0.1 | Yoneyama et al., | ||||
| Cd | 3 | Kato et al., | ||||||
| Cd | <0.1–2 | Uraguchi et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 0.5 | Larbi et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 1 | Larbi et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 10 | Orera et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 5 | Rellán-Álvarez et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 5 | Rellán-Álvarez et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 4 | Terzano et al., | ||||||
| Cu | 13 | 15–56 | 1 | 2 | Pich and Scholz, | |||
| Zn | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2–84 | White et al., | |||
| Zn | 32–89 | 12–214 | Barabasz et al., | |||||
| Cd | 2 | 3–12 | nd–95 | Sagardoy, | ||||
| Zn | 15–100 | Lasat et al., | ||||||
| Zn | 54–524 | Lasat et al., | ||||||
| Ni | nd–450 | Mari et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 3 | López-Millán et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 7 | Larbi et al., | ||||||
| Mn | 11–22 | Führs et al., | ||||||
| Mn | 400–2300 | Führs et al., | ||||||
| Mn | 150 | Sasaki et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 2 | López-Millán et al., | ||||||
| Zn | 2 | 1 | Barabasz et al., | |||||
| 4–76 | 78–245 | Shelp, | ||||||
| 83 | 24 | 8 | 66 | Hocking, | ||||
| 168 | 16 | 19 | 243 | Hocking, | ||||
| Cu | 54 | 7 | 20 | 14 | Ando et al., | |||
| Cd | nd–18 | Tanaka et al., | ||||||
| Cd | 50 | 34 | 0.1 | Yoneyama et al., | ||||
| Cd | 1 | Kato et al., | ||||||
| 40–64 | 8–12 | 16–28 | 40–74 | Schmidke and Stephan, | ||||
| 37 | Schmidke et al., | |||||||
Specific cases are marked as follows:
High or low metal supply;
High or low metal supply in combination with a chemical (e.g., histidine, ABA, metal resupply);
Mutant or transgenic genotypes; and
Hyper-accumulator plant species. nd: not detected.
Metal ligand concentrations (malate and citrate in mM and the rest in μM) in xylem sap, leaf apoplastic fluid and phloem sap.
| Ni | 40–500 | Kerkeb and Krämer, | ||||||
| Ni | 2 | 0.5 | nd | Alves et al., | ||||
| Fe | 0.2–0.4 | Rombolà et al., | ||||||
| Cd | 0.02 | 0.3 | 12 | Ueno et al., | ||||
| 0.06 | Durrett et al., | |||||||
| 0.2–0.9 | Schuler et al., | |||||||
| Fe | 2–30 | 0.2–5 | nd–4 | López-Millán et al., | ||||
| Fe | 2–14 | 1–3 | Larbi et al., | |||||
| Zn | 0.5C–2 | 0.06–0.3 | Sagardoy et al., | |||||
| Cu | 64–271 | 17–140 | Irtelli et al., | |||||
| Ni | 40 | Kerkeb and Krämer, | ||||||
| Cd | 0.02–0.23 | 0.01 | Wei et al., | |||||
| Cd | 0.7–0.9 | 0.5–0.6 | 66 | Nakamura et al., | ||||
| Fe | 0.01–0.03 | <0.01–0.02 | 30–450 | Alam et al., | ||||
| Fe | 90 | Kawai et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 0.8–5 | 0.3–1.3 | López-Millán et al., | |||||
| Zn | 0.04 | 0.08 | 26 | White et al., | ||||
| 10 | Hocking, | |||||||
| 0.15–0.18 | 0.05 | Yokosho et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 0.3 | 0.1 | Yokosho et al., | |||||
| Fe | 10–18 | 10–48 | Kakei et al., | |||||
| Cu | 0.08 | 28 | 34 | Ando et al., | ||||
| Fe | 0.1–3 | 0.03–0.5 | Larbi et al., | |||||
| Fe | 0.7–2 | 0.05–0.8 | Larbi et al., | |||||
| Cd | 1–2 | 0.5–1.2 | Gogorcena et al., | |||||
| Fe | 0.6–4 | 0.04–0.6 | López-Millán et al., | |||||
| Fe | 0.01–0.17 | Rellán-Álvarez et al., | ||||||
| Cu | nd | Pich and Scholz, | ||||||
| Zn | 0.06 | <0.04 | 6 | White et al., | ||||
| Cd | 0.1–0.3 | 0.01 | Sagardoy, | |||||
| Zn | 0.1–0.3 | nd | 110–140 | Lasat et al., | ||||
| Ni | nd | Persans et al., | ||||||
| Zn | 0.1–0.2 | nd | nd | Lasat et al., | ||||
| Ni | 8–18 | Persans et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 0.7–2 | 0.7–4 | <1–4 | López-Millán et al., | ||||
| Fe | 0.2–4 | Larbi et al., | ||||||
| Fe | 1.6 | 0.8–1.8 | López-Millán et al., | |||||
| 1.6 | 2.1 | Fiehn, | ||||||
| 5.5 | 1.1 | Lattanzio et al., | ||||||
| 370 | Hocking, | |||||||
| Cu | >0.08 | 66 | 152 | Ando et al., | ||||
| Cd | >0.001–>0.002 | 66–83 | 152–176 | nd–63 | Kato et al., | |||
High or low metal supply;
Mutant or transgenic genotypes; and
Hyper-accumulator plant species.
Nd, not detected; NA, nicotianamine; DMA, 2'-deoxymugineic acid; His, histidine; PCs, phytochelatins.
Figure 1Schematic representation showing the metal species found in the xylem and phloem saps of non-grass (upper panels) and grass plant species (lower panels) grown at low and adequate metal supply (left panels) or at high metal supply (right panels). Metals occurred in free ionic forms and in complexes with different ligands such as nicotianamine (NA), 2′-deoxymugineic acid (DMA), carboxylates (e.g., citrate), histidine (His), phytochelatins (PCs) and proteins. Putative metal species proposed to occur in plant fluids as supported by strong evidence from indirect approaches (e.g., molecular biology and others) are shown with faded symbols. *Most of the data with high metal supply have been described in metal hyper-accumulator plant species.