| Literature DB >> 35054302 |
Nitaya Indrawattana1, Pisinee Aiumurai2, Nawannaporn Sae-Lim2, Watee Seesuay2, Onrapak Reamtong3, Manas Chongsa-Nguan1,4, Wanpen Chaicumpa2, Nitat Sookrung2,5.
Abstract
A point-of-care diagnostic for early and rapid diagnosis of scrub typhus caused by Orientia tsutsugamushi is required for prompt and proper treatment of patients presenting with undifferentiated febrile illnesses. In this study, an immunochromatographic antigen detection test kit (ICT AgTK) that targets the highly conserved O. tsutsugamushi 60 kDa GroEL chaperonin (heat shock protein 60) was developed. E. coli-derived recombinant GroEL expressed from DNA coding for the consensus sequence of 32 GroEL gene sequences extracted from the GenBank database was used to immunize rabbits and mice. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies (pAb) were used for preparing a gold-pAb conjugate, and the rGroEL-specific mouse monoclonal antibody was used as the antigen detection reagent at the ICT test line. In-house validation revealed that the ICT AgTK gave 85, 100 and 95% diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, respectively, compared to the combined clinical features and standard IFA when tested on 40 frozen serum samples. The test kits correctly identified 10 scrub typhus samples out of 15 fresh plasma/buffy coat samples of patients with febrile illnesses. For independent laboratory validation, the ICT AgTK was sent to one provincial hospital. The ICT AgTK utilized by the hospital medical technologist correctly identified six scrub typhus samples out of 20 serum samples of patients with fever, as confirmed by specific IgM/IgG detection by IFA. The ICT AgTK is easy to perform with rapid turn-around time. It has the potential to be used as an important tool for on-site and early scrub typhus diagnosis by allowing testing of freshly collected samples (serum, plasma or buffy coat), especially in resource-limited healthcare settings.Entities:
Keywords: GroEL chaperonin; Orientia tsutsugamushi; antigen detection test kit; hybridoma; immunochromatography (ICT); scrub typhus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35054302 PMCID: PMC8775097 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1Recombinant GroEL preparation. (A) SDS-PAGE-separated proteins in the soluble and insoluble fractions of transformed BL21 (DE) E. coli carrying pET23b+ with inserted DNA coding for rGroEL of O. tsutsugamushi. Lanes 1 and 5, proteins in soluble and insoluble fractions of original BL21 (DE3) E. coli, respectively; lanes 2–4, proteins in the soluble fractions of transformed BL21 (DE3) E. coli, clones 1–3, respectively; lanes 6–8, proteins in the insoluble fractions of transformed BL21 (DE3) E. coli, clones 1–3, respectively. The recombinant protein was predominant in the E. coli insoluble fraction (red box and arrow). (B) Purified recombinant protein (arrow) from the transformed E. coli insoluble fraction solubilized in 1% SDS. Lanes M of (A,B) are protein molecular weight marker. Numbers on the left of both Figures are protein masses in kDa.
Figure 2Mouse and rabbit sera immune to rGroEL and mouse hybridomas secreting monoclonal antibodies against rGroEL. (A) Western blot patterns of the mouse and rabbit polyclonal antibodies that bound to the SDS-PAGE-separated rGroEL of O. tsutsugamushi. Lane M, protein molecular mass marker; lane 1, positive control, i.e., the SDS-PAGE-separated rGroEL probed with anti-His monoclonal antibody; lane 2, SDS-PAGE-separated rGroEL probed with serum of immunized mouse number 1; lane 3, SDS-PAGE-separated rGroEL probed with rabbit immune serum. Numbers on the left are protein masses in kDa. The rGroEL-antibody reactive bands are indicated by arrow. (B) OD 405 nm of indirect ELISA for testing binding of monoclonal antibodies in culture supernatants of 10 hybridomas to purified rGroEL in comparison with the control antigen (lysate of original BL21 (DE3) E. coli host). Mouse serum immune to rGroEL (Antiserum) and culture supernatant of the P3x-63-Ag8.653 mouse myeloma cells P3x medium) were included as positive and negative binding controls.
Figure 3The rGroEL detection limit of the ICT AgTK. Different amounts of rGroEL (62.5–1000 ng) in 10 µL PBS were applied to the ICT AgTK. Negative was PBS alone. The lowest amount of the rGroEL that could be detected by the test kit was 125 ng. The results of the ICT AgTK were read 5 min after applying the samples. A positive result is seen as two red lines (the left line is the test (T) line, and the right line is the control (C) line); only C shows a negative result.