| Literature DB >> 35054194 |
Hossein Aboutalebi1,2, Maya Pavlova3, Mohammad Javad Shafiee2,3,4, Ali Sabri5, Amer Alaref6,7, Alexander Wong2,3,4.
Abstract
The world is still struggling in controlling and containing the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The medical conditions associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections have resulted in a surge in the number of patients at clinics and hospitals, leading to a significantly increased strain on healthcare resources. As such, an important part of managing and handling patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections within the clinical workflow is severity assessment, which is often conducted with the use of chest X-ray (CXR) images. In this work, we introduce COVID-Net CXR-S, a convolutional neural network for predicting the airspace severity of a SARS-CoV-2 positive patient based on a CXR image of the patient's chest. More specifically, we leveraged transfer learning to transfer representational knowledge gained from over 16,000 CXR images from a multinational cohort of over 15,000 SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patient cases into a custom network architecture for severity assessment. Experimental results using the RSNA RICORD dataset showed that the proposed COVID-Net CXR-S has potential to be a powerful tool for computer-aided severity assessment of CXR images of COVID-19 positive patients. Furthermore, radiologist validation on select cases by two board-certified radiologists with over 10 and 19 years of experience, respectively, showed consistency between radiologist interpretation and critical factors leveraged by COVID-Net CXR-S for severity assessment. While not a production-ready solution, the ultimate goal for the open source release of COVID-Net CXR-S is to act as a catalyst for clinical scientists, machine learning researchers, as well as citizen scientists to develop innovative new clinical decision support solutions for helping clinicians around the world manage the continuing pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; computer vision; deep neural networks; severity assessment
Year: 2021 PMID: 35054194 PMCID: PMC8774375 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1COVID-Net CXR-S network design. The COVID-Net backbone design exhibits high architectural diversity and sparse long-range connectivity, with macroarchitecture and microarchitecture designs tailored specifically for the detection of COVID-19 from chest X-ray images. The network design leverages light-weight design patterns in the form of projection-expansion-projection-expansion (PEPE) patterns to provide enhanced representational capabilities while maintaining low architectural and computational complexities.
Detailed description of each layer of COVID-Net CXR-S architecture. PRPE refers to layer with convolution layer of filter size .
| Layer Name | Output Size | Specs (Filter Shape, Filter Number) |
|---|---|---|
| Conv1 |
| |
| PRPE 1.1 |
| |
| PRPE 1.2 |
| |
| PRPE 1.3 |
| |
| PRPE 2.1 |
| |
| PRPE 2.2 |
| |
| PRPE 2.3 |
| |
| PRPE 2.4 |
| |
| PRPE 3.1 |
| |
| PRPE 3.2 |
| |
| PRPE 3.3 |
| |
| PRPE 3.4 |
| |
| PRPE 3.5 |
| |
| PRPE 3.6 |
| |
| PRPE 4.1 |
| |
| PRPE 4.2 |
| |
| PRPE 4.3 |
| |
| Dense | 2 |
Figure 2Example chest X-ray images from the RSNA RICORD dataset: (1) Level 1 airspace severity: opacities in 1–2 lung zones and (2) Level 2 airspace severity: opacities in 3 or more lung zones.
Summary of demographic variables and imaging protocol variables of CXR data in the dataset used in this study. Age and sex statistics are expressed on a patient level, while imaging view statistics are expressed on an image level.
| Age | Mean ± Std |
|
|---|---|---|
| <20 | 2 (0.8%) | |
| 20–29 | 7 (2.7%) | |
| 30–39 | 26 (10.1%) | |
| 40–49 | 37 (14.3%) | |
| 50–59 | 58 (22.5%) | |
| 60–69 | 58 (22.5%) | |
| 70–79 | 42 (16.3%) | |
| 80–89 | 22 (8.5%) | |
| 90+ | 6 (2.3%) | |
|
| ||
| Male | 161 (62.4%) | |
| Female | 97 (37.6%) | |
|
| ||
| AP | 505 (55.6%) | |
| PA | 5 (0.6%) | |
| Unknown | 399 (43.9%) |
Sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of the proposed COVID-Net CXR-S, CheXNet [23], and ResNet-50 [22]. Best numbers are highlighted in bold.
| Metric | Sensitivity (Level 1) | Sensitivity (Level 2) | PPV (Level 1) | PPV (Level 2) | AUC | Accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network | |||||||
|
|
| 63.46% | 82.88% | 84.62% | 83.62 % | 83.33% | |
|
| 91.84% | 78.85% |
| 83.67% | 91.88% | 87.33% | |
|
| 92.3% |
| 87.27% |
|
|
| |
Architectural and computational complexity of the proposed COVID-Net CXR-S, CheXNet [23], and ResNet-50 [22]. Best numbers are highlighted in bold.
| Network | Parameters (M) | FLOPs (G) |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| 26.0 |
|
| 23.6 | 35.5 |
|
| 8.8 |
|
Confusion Matrix of COVID-Net CXR-S.
| Severity Level | Level 1 | Level 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
| 48 | 4 |
|
| 7 | 91 |
Figure 3Examples of Level 2 severity patient cases and the associated critical factors (highlighted in red) as identified by GSInquire [21] during explainability-driven performance validation as what drove the decision-making behavior of COVID-Net CXR-S. (left) Case 1, (middle) Case 2, (right) Case 3. Radiologist validation showed that several of the critical factors identified are consistent with radiologist interpretation.