| Literature DB >> 35053661 |
Yun-Young Lee1, Insu Choi2, Seung-Jae Lee3, In-Seok Jeong4, Young-Ok Kim2, Young-Jong Woo2, Hwa-Jin Cho2.
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) successfully restores systemic circulation approximately 50% of the time; however, many successfully restored patients have severe neurologic damage. In adults, the gray matter to white matter attenuation ratio (GWR) in brain computed tomography (CT) correlates with the neurologic outcome. However, in children, the clinical significance of GWR still remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of children who underwent CPR for cardiac arrest according to the survival and to demonstrate the differentiation of grey/white matter by Hounsfield units of brain CT and to characterize the attenuations of grey and white matters.Entities:
Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); gray to white matter ratio (GWR); neurologic outcome; pediatric; survival
Year: 2022 PMID: 35053661 PMCID: PMC8774629 DOI: 10.3390/children9010036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Figure 1The points of measurement in Hounsfield units of brain computed tomography at (A) Basal ganglia level, (B) Centrum semiovale level, (C) High convexity level. (A) Regions of interest (ROI) (10 mm2) are positioned in 5 points of the genu of the corpus callosum (CC) (1), caudate nucleus (CN) (2), putamen (PU) (3), posterior lime of internal capsule (PIC) (4). (B,C) ROI are positioned in 2 points of the medial cortex (MC1 and MC2) and medial white matter (MWM1 and MWM2). Grey and White matter ratio (GWR) in basal ganglia was calculated as follows: (CN + PU)/(CC + PIC). GWR in medial cortex and white matter was calculated as follows: (MC1 + MC2)/(MWM1 + MWM2). Average GWR was defined as the average of these 2 GWR (GWR of basal ganglia + GWR of cerebrum/2).
Figure 2The flowchart of the patients.
Profiles of study population.
| Characteristics | Total | Survivor | Non-Survivor ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 5.5 (0–13) | 5.5 (0.5–13) | 2.5 (1–8.5) | 0.555 |
| Female, | 18 (32.1) | 7 (29.2) | 11 (34.4) | 0.197 |
| Primary cause of arrest | 0.010 | |||
| Cardiac, | 13 (23.2) | 8 (33.3) | 5 (15.6) | |
| Respiratory, | 28 (50.0) | 15 (62.5) | 13 (40.6) | |
| Other, | 15 (26.8) | 1 (4.2) | 14 (43.6) | |
| Shockable arrhythmia, | 14 (25.0) | 8 (33.3) | 6 (18.8) | 0.216 |
| Seizure, | 28 (50.0) | 17 (70.8) | 11 (34.4) | 0.006 |
| Sepsis, | 4 (7.1) | 1 (4.2) | 3 (9.4) | 0.099 |
| Duration of CPR (min) | 15 (5–28.3) | 5 (2.0–10.0) | 18 (13.7–30) | <0.001 |
| CT after ROCS (hr) | 3 (1–12.2) | 5 (1.3–20.7) | 2(1–5.5) | 0.141 |
| Length of ICU stay (day) | 10 (3–30) | 13.5 (9.0–24.5) | 8 (3.0–22.6) | 0.174 |
| Initial NSE (ng/mL) | 43.2 (31.0–56.5) | 37.8 (26.4–51.3) | 43.2 (38.2–109.9) | 0.241 |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 10.7 (4.9–15.7) | 9.4 (4.9–11.9) | 12.3 (4.2–17.2) | 0.138 |
| Antiepileptics, | 33 (58.9) | 20 (83.3) | 13 (40.6) | 0.001 |
| Use of ECMO, | 2 (3.6) | 1 (4.2) | 1 (3.1) | 0.836 |
| EEG done, | 38 (67.8) | 21(87.5) | 17 (53.1) | 0.006 |
| EEG finding | 0.003 | |||
| Normal, | 2 (5.3) | 1 (4.8) | 1 (5.9) | |
| Spikes, | 7 (18.4) | 6 (28.6) | 1 (5.9) | |
| Delta waves, | 21 (55.3) | 14 (66.7) | 7 (41.2) | |
| Near flat or flat, | 8 (21.1) | 0 (0) | 8 (47.1) | |
| Glasgow coma scale | 3 (3–4.5) | 3 (3–7.2) | 3 (3–4) | 0.428 |
| GOS-E Peds score | <0.001 | |||
| GOS-E Peds 1–3 | 6 (10.7%) | 6 (25.0) | 0 (0) | |
| GOS-E Peds 4–6 | 7 (12.5%) | 7 (29.1) | 0 (0) | |
| GOS-E Peds 7–8 | 43(76.7%) | 11 (45.8) | 32 (100) |
Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CT, computed tomography; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; EEG, electroencephalogram; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; GOS-E Peds, Glasgow outcome scale-extended pediatrics; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.
Comparison of absolute attenuation in Hounsfield units and grey/white matter ratio between survivors and non-survivors.
| Total | Survivors | Non Survivors | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caudate nucleus | 32.0 (27.5–36.0) | 32.5 (27.5–36.5) | 28.5 (25.0–32.5) | 0.014 |
| Putamen | 31.0 (28.0–34.5) | 30.5 (27.5–34.5) | 30.0 (25.0–32.0) | 0.288 |
| Corpus callosum | 26.0 (23.5–31.0) | 27.5 (21.5–31.0) | 25.5 (23.0–28.5) | 0.652 |
| Post limb of internal capsule | 27.0 (24.0–30.0) | 27.5 (22.0–31.0) | 26.0 (24.5–29.0) | 0.535 |
| Medial cortex1 | 31.0 (26.2–34.0) | 32.0 (27.7–34.5) | 27.5 (25.0–31.0) | 0.004 |
| Medial white matter 1 | 25.0 (22.2–28.7) | 28.0 (24.0–30.0) | 23.0 (22.0–26.0) | 0.005 |
| Medial cortex2 | 32.0 (28.0–35.0) | 34.0 (28.7–35.0) | 29.5 (25.0–32.0) | 0.012 |
| Medial white matter 2 | 26.0 (23.0–28.0) | 27.0 (23.0–29.0) | 24.0 (23.0–27.0) | 0.104 |
| GWR in Basal ganglia | 1.19 (1.09–1.27) | 1.17 (1.09–1.21) | 1.12 (0.98–1.22) | 0.187 |
| GWR in cerebrum | 0.78 (0.70–0.85) | 0.74 (0.68–0.82) | 0.83 (0.75–0.91) | 0.026 |
| Average GWR | 1.18 (1.08–1.26) | 1.18 (1.13–1.22) | 1.10 (1.01–1.17) | 0.034 |
Figure 3Comparison of absolute attenuations and GWRs among survivors, non-survivors, and healthy controls. * p < 0.05.
Logistic regression of absolute attenuation in Hounsfield units and grey/white matter ratio.
| Odds Ratio | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Caudate nucleus | 1.11 | 0.85–1.44 | 0.415 |
| Medial cortex 1 | 0.80 | 0.67–0.95 | 0.011 |
| Medial white matter 1 | 0.68 | 0.41–1.13 | 0.138 |
| Medial cortex 2 | 1.04 | 0.72–1.52 | 0.805 |
| GWR in cerebrum | 3.35 | 0.00–35.4 | 0.774 |
| Average GWR | 0.00 | 0.00–0.53 | 0.032 |
Comparison of absolute attenuation in Hounsfield units and grey/white matter ratio between better neurologic outcome and poorer neurologic outcome.
| GOS 1–4 ( | GOS 5–8 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Caudate nucleus | 36.0 (31.0–37.0) | 30.0 (26.0–33.0) | 0.049 |
| Putamen | 33.5 (30.0–37.0) | 30.0 (26.0–32.0) | 0.177 |
| Corpus callosum | 31.0 (29.0–31.0) | 25.5 (23.0–29.0) | 0.114 |
| Post limb of internal capsule | 30.5 (26.0–31.0) | 26.0 (23.0–29.0) | 0.117 |
| Medial cortex1 | 33.5 (32.0–36.0) | 29.0 (25.0–32.0) | 0.013 |
| Medial white matter 1 | 29.0 (28.0–30.0) | 24.0 (22.0–27.0) | 0.009 |
| Medial cortex2 | 35.0 (35.0–36.0) | 30.0 (25.7–33.0) | 0.002 |
| Medial white matter 2 | 28.0 (27.0–29.0) | 24.0 (22.7–27.0) | 0.018 |
| GWR in Basal ganglia | 1.14 (1.10–1.20) | 1.13 (1.02–1.22) | 0.851 |
| GWR in cerebrum | 0.70 (0.68–0.75) | 0.80 (0.74–0.90) | 0.049 |
| Average GWR | 1.20 (1.17–1.22) | 1.13 (1.02–1.19) | 0.063 |
Logistic Regression of Absolute Attenuation in Hounsfield Units and Grey/White Matter Ratio According to Neurologic Outcome.
| Odds Ratio | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cudate nucleus | 0.99 | 0.81–1.22 | 0.976 |
| Medial cortex 1 | 0.83 | 0.68–0.99 | 0.043 |
| Medial white matter 1 | 0.96 | 0.65–1.41 | 0.831 |
| Medial cortex 2 | 0.93 | 0.64–1.34 | 0.699 |
| Medial white matter 2 | 1.14 | 0.74–1.74 | 0.542 |
| GWR in cerebrum | 14.7 | 0.00–34.7 | 0.496 |
Figure 4ROC curves to predict survival. The AUC for average GWR was 0.666 (p = 0.035) and AUC of medial cortex 1 was 0.733 (p = 0.002). ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under curve; GWR, grey matter to white matter attenuation ratio.