| Literature DB >> 35053409 |
Ada-Sophia Clees1, Verena Stolp1,2, Björn Häupl1,2,3, Dominik C Fuhrmann4, Frank Wempe1, Marcel Seibert1,2, Sarah Weber1,2, Antje Banning5, Ritva Tikkanen5, Richard Williams6, Bernhard Brüne2,3,4, Hubert Serve1,2,3, Frank Schnütgen1,2,3, Ivana von Metzler1,2,3, Nina Kurrle1,2,3.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy, which is characterized by clonal proliferation of neoplastic plasma cells in the bone marrow. This microenvironment is characterized by low oxygen levels (1-6% O2), known as hypoxia. For MM cells, hypoxia is a physiologic feature that has been described to promote an aggressive phenotype and to confer drug resistance. However, studies on hypoxia are scarce and show little conformity. Here, we analyzed the mRNA expression of previously determined hypoxia markers to define the temporal adaptation of MM cells to chronic hypoxia. Subsequent analyses of the global proteome in MM cells and the stromal cell line HS-5 revealed hypoxia-dependent regulation of proteins, which directly or indirectly upregulate glycolysis. In addition, chronic hypoxia led to MM-specific regulation of nine distinct proteins. One of these proteins is the cysteine protease legumain (LGMN), the depletion of which led to a significant growth disadvantage of MM cell lines that is enhanced under hypoxia. Thus, herein, we report a methodologic strategy to examine MM cells under physiologic hypoxic conditions in vitro and to decipher and study previously masked hypoxia-specific therapeutic targets such as the cysteine protease LGMN.Entities:
Keywords: asparaginyl endopepdidase (AEP); chronic hypoxia; glycolysis; legumain; multiple myeloma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35053409 PMCID: PMC8773999 DOI: 10.3390/cells11020292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Primer sequences for Real-time PCRs.
| Gene | Primer Sequence 5′–3′ |
|---|---|
| GCACGACACCGGGAAGTT (forward) | |
| GGATGCCGCCCGCATCCGAG (forward) | |
| AAGCGCATTTCTGGTCTCAT (forward) | |
| TTGCATGAAGCAGCAAAAAG (forward) | |
| GGAATCCCTATCTTTAGTCCAAT (forward) | |
| ATCCTGAAGATGGAGGCAAG (forward) |
Oligonucleotides for sgRNAs.
| Gene | Primer Sequence 5′–3′ |
|---|---|
| h | CACCGgcgatgcagaagcagtgaa (forward) |
| h | CACCGttgtgatcaacaggcccaa (forward) |
| h | CACCGttcgtcaggaatcccattg (forward) |
| h | CACCGttgcggtgaatgatctggt (forward) |
| h | CACCGtccaaggtgcagaatggtt (forward) |
| h | CACCGctggactcctccagatcat (forward) |
| h | CACCGaaatggctggtataattat (forward) |
| h | CACCGgccccgtctgcctcacaga (forward) |
| h | CACCGtctgagacgagcttggcgg (forward) |
| NTC1 | CACCGttccgggctaacaagtcct (forward) |
Figure 1Definition of chronic hypoxia in MM cells: mRNA expression of acute and chronic hypoxia-related marker genes in RPMI-8226, LP-1, OPM-2 and KMS-12-BM cells grown at 1% O2 for 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 days. (A) relative EGLN1 mRNA levels normalized to TATA-box-binding protein (TBP) and to day 0. (B) relative ADM mRNA levels normalized to TBP and day 0. (C) relative H4C1 mRNA levels normalized to TBP and day 0. (D) relative OSTF1 mRNA levels normalized to TBP and day 0. Graphs indicate mRNA levels ± SD of one representative experiment, total n = 3. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Values of p > 0.05 were considered not significant (n.s.).
Figure 2HIF1α and HIF2α levels during the adaptation to hypoxia: (A) Western blot of HIF1α (upper blot) and HIF2α (lower blot) levels during the adaptation to hypoxic conditions (1% O2) up to 7 days in RPMI-8226 cells. Loading control: β-actin. (B) Densitometric quantifications of protein levels (HIF1α and HIF2α). Signals were normalized to β-actin. (C) Model of adaptation of MM cells to hypoxia in in vitro cell culture. Abbreviations: h = hours; d = day; rel. = relative; kDa = kilodalton.
Figure 3Global proteome profiling of multiple myeloma and stromal cell lines: (A) Heatmap of Z-transformed SILAC ratios (chronic hypoxia/normoxia) of protein groups quantified in each LC/MS analysis. Rows and columns are clustered based on the Euclidean distance and average linkage method. (B) Venn diagram illustrating the numbers and overlap of proteins regulated under hypoxia for the multiple myeloma cell lines under investigation. Regulated proteins were assigned by filtering for SILAC ratios showing 2-fold up- or down-regulation in at least 2 biological replicate analyses per cell line. (C) Volcano plot showing proteins significantly regulated under hypoxic conditions across the multiple myeloma cell lines LP-1, OPM-2, RPMI-8226 and the stromal cell line HS-5. For statistical analysis, one-sample t-test of the log2-transformed SILAC ratios against zero (no change) was conducted and the p-values were adjusted for multiple hypotheses testing (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 5%). (D) Venn diagram showing the numbers and overlap of regulated proteins between the multiple myeloma cell lines (MM) and the bone marrow stromal cell line HS-5, including and excluding MM cell line KMS-12-BM.
Significant hypoxia-regulated proteins in Multiple Myeloma cell lines LP-1, OPM-2 and RPMI-8226.
| Protein Name | Median log2 SILAC Ratio | Peptides | Unique Peptides | Sequence Coverage [%] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LP-1 | OPM-2 | RPMI-8226 | ||||
| JCHAIN | 2.9 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 11 | 11 | 67 |
| LGMN | 2.2 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 18 | 15 | 59 |
| EGLN1 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 14 | 1 | 43 |
| HMOX1 | −1.6 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 9 | 9 | 37 |
| RRM1 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 37 | 37 | 61 |
| KDM5C | 2.0 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 53 | 1 | 46 |
| SARS1 | −1.3 | −1.1 | −1.4 | 32 | 32 | 56 |
| ISOC1 | −1.0 | −1.4 | −1.3 | 14 | 14 | 65 |
| PSPH | −2.0 | −1.6 | −2.7 | 19 | 19 | 73 |
Figure 4Pathway analysis of hypoxia-regulated pathways in MM and HS-5 cells: Proteins considered to be regulated in each cell line were subjected to Ingenuity core analysis and activation Z-scores of pathways scoring in at least 2 cell lines were plotted. MM cell lines RPMI-8226, LP-1 and OPM-2 and with (A) and without (B) the bone marrow stromal cell line HS-5 cells. (C) Illustration of the individual glycolytic enzymes identified in our LC/MS measurement. Upregulation was defined as normalized log2 SILAC ratio chronic hypoxia/normoxia >0.6. Upregulation in MM cells was defined as upregulation in at least one MM cell line. Abbreviations: P = phosphate, GAP = glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, DHAP = dihydroxyacetone-phosphate, PEP = phosphoenolpyruvate.
Figure 5Hexokinase 2 and lactate dehydrogenase A protein expression in chronic hypoxia: Four MM cell lines and the bone marrow stromal cell line HS-5 were cultivated under hypoxic conditions and harvested at day 0, 1 and 7 for protein analysis. Representative Western blots for hexokinase 2 (HK2) (A) and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) (C) are shown. Loading control: β-tubulin. Densitometric quantifications of protein expression are shown in (B) for HK2 and (D) for LDHA. Signals were normalized to β-tubulin expression. Bar graphs represent mean ±SEM of 3 independent experiments. One-way-ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. Abbreviations: d = day; rel. = relative; kDa = kilodalton; HK2 = hexokinase 2; LDHA = lactate dehydrogenase A.
Figure 6MM-specific upregulation of the cysteine protease legumain (LGMN) in chronic hypoxia: Four MM cell lines and the bone marrow stromal cell line HS-5 were cultured under hypoxic conditions (1% O2) and analyzed at day 0, 1 and 7 for protein and mRNA expression. (A) Relative LGMN mRNA levels in MM cell lines, normalized to TATA-box-binding protein (TBP) mRNA levels. * p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001. (B) Representative Western blots for LGMN at 56 kDa (pro-LGMN) and 37 kDa (activated LGMN). β-tubulin served as a loading control. (C) Densitometric quantifications of LGMN expression (pro-LGMN and active LGMN). Signals were normalized to β-tubulin expression. Bar graphs represent the mean ±SEM of three independent experiments. One-way-ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. (D) The extracellular concentration of LGMN in RPMI-8226, OP;-2 and U266 cells was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the supernatant under normoxic and chronic hypoxic conditions. Extracellular concentration of LGMN [ng/mL] in RPMI 8226, OPM 2 and U266 cells. Bar graphs indicate the mean ±SEM of three technical replicates. Unpaired student’s t-test, *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
Figure 7CRISPR/Cas9-based depletion of LGMN in MM cells confers enhanced growth disadvantage under chronic hypoxia: (A) Left: Competition growth assay of RPMI-8226 LGMN KO cells (sgRNA1, 3, 4 and 1 + 4) using NTC as a negative control and c-myc KO as a positive control in hypoxia (1% O2). The percentage of GFP-positive cells measured via flow cytometry is normalized to NTC and day 0. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM of three technical replicates. Right: Representative Western blot of LGMN KO in RPMI-8226 cells used in the competition assay. Loading control: Nucleolin. (B) Left: Cumulative growth assay of RPMI-8226 LGMN KO (sgRNA5, 8) and NTC cells in normoxia (21% O2, blue colors) and hypoxia (1% O2, red colors). Error bars indicate mean ± SEM of three technical replicates. Right: Representative Western blot of LGMN KO in RPMI-8226 cells used in the cumulative growth assay. Loading control: Vinculin. (C) Viability assay in RPMI-8226 cells of 3 independent experiments after treatment with LGMN inhibitor 10t for 48 h under normoxia and hypoxia. Viability in [%] measured by NAD(P)H production. IC50 is represented by black dashed line by blue dotted line in the graph and hypoxia by red dotted line. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM of three biological replicates. (D) Apoptosis assay. Annexin V-PE-positive (apoptotic) RPMI-8226 cells [% of total cells] four and six days post transduction with sgRNA NTC, sgRNA LGMN(5) and sgRNA LGMN(8) in normoxic conditions. Bar graphs represent the mean ± SD of two independent experiments. (E) Rescue experiment using a pro-LGMN WT construct (LGMN Wt SIHW) in RPMI-8226 NTC and LGMN KO (sgRNA5) cells under normoxic conditions. Bar graphs represent the cumulative, relative cell number after 12 days of 3 independent experiments. Two-way-ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001. Values of p > 0.05 were considered not significant (ns). Abbreviations: p.t. = post transduction.