| Literature DB >> 35052410 |
Juying Han1, Brian Ritchey1, Emmanuel Opoku1, Jonathan D Smith1.
Abstract
A mouse strain intercross between Apoe-/- AKR/J and DBA/2J mice identified three replicated atherosclerosis quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Our objective was to fine map mouse atherosclerosis modifier genes within a genomic region known to affect lesion development in apoE-deficient (Apoe-/-) mice. We dissected the Ath28 QTL on the distal end of chromosome 2 by breeding a panel of congenic strains and measuring aortic root lesion area in 16-week-old male and female mice fed regular laboratory diets. The parental congenic strain contained ~9.65 Mb of AKR/J DNA from chromosome 2 on the DBA/2J genetic background, which had lesions 55% and 47% smaller than female and male DBA/2J mice, respectively (p < 0.001). Seven additional congenic lines identified three separate regions associated with the lesion area, named Ath28.1, Ath28.2, and Ath28.3, where the AKR/J alleles were atherosclerosis-protective for two regions and atherosclerosis-promoting for the other region. These results were replicated in both sexes, and in combined analysis after adjusting for sex. The congenic lines did not greatly impact total and HDL cholesterol levels or body weight. Bioinformatic analyses identified all coding and non-coding genes in the Ath28.1 sub-region, as well as strain sequence differences that may be impactful. Even within a <10 Mb region of the mouse genome, evidence supports the presence of at least three atherosclerosis modifier genes that differ between the AKR/J and DBA/2J mouse strains, supporting the polygenic nature of atherosclerosis susceptibility.Entities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; mouse genetics; quantitative trait locus mapping
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35052410 PMCID: PMC8774523 DOI: 10.3390/genes13010070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Ath28 subcongenic strains and aortic root lesions. The map positions of the eight strains that cover this region, areas between mapped markers are shown in gray. The boxed regions show the position of three putative atherosclerosis QTLs with the −1 and +1 scores where the AKR alleles are associated with smaller and larger lesions, respectively.
Figure 2Aortic root lesion areas in female mice (A), male mice (B), and combined sexes after sex adjustment (C). Lesions were compared against the DBA/2J strain, in females the data were normally distributed (mean ± S.D. shown) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Males and combined sex lesions (median ± I.Q.R shown) were analyzed by non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. The sum above the lesion data indicates the lesion change expected based on inclusion of the Ath28.1 (−1, the AKR/J allele decreases lesion area), Ath28.2 (+1, the AKR/J allele increases lesion area), and Ath28.3 regions (−1).
Figure 3Representative aortic root lesions in female mice from the parental DBA/2 strain and the eight congenic lines stained with Oil red O and hematoxylin. 4× objective lens.
Body weights, total plasma, and HDL cholesterol levels in DBA/2 and congenic mice.
| Mouse Line | Body Wt g | Total Cholesterol | HDL Cholesterol | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| DBA/2 | 26.2 ± 2.5 (39) | 1099 (888–1206) (36) | 27 (16–50.2) (27) | |||
| 1-7 | 26.3 ± 2.9 (28) | ns | 1089 (951–1217) (28) | ns | 43.2 (30.2–62) (22) | ns |
| 1-6 | 27.0 ± 1.5 (11) | ns | 1173 (1016–1345) (11) | ns | 54.7 (38–89.1) (8) | * |
| 1-5 | 24.2 ± 3.5 (7) | ns | 1056 (883–1164) (7) | ns | 43.6 (36.5–68) (7) | ns |
| 1-4 | 26.9 ± 2.0 (15) | ns | 1077 (870–1120) (15) | ns | 38.7 (29.5–50.3) (14) | ns |
| 1-3 | 26.6 ± 2.1 (24) | ns | 1031 (891–1151) (24) | ns | 51 (38.4–60.4) (24) | * |
| 3-7 | 27.2 ± 2.0 (12) | ns | 1077 (1000–1131) (12) | ns | 30.5 (26.1–43.1) (10) | ns |
| 4-7 | 24.1 ± 2.2 (22) | ** | 1111 (1003–1244) (18) | ns | 37.2 (26.6–56.6) (16) | ns |
| 5-7 | 24.7 ± 1.7 (14) | ns | 1016 (934–1042) (15) | ns | 44.8 (26.6–63.3) (14) | ns |
|
| ||||||
| DBA/2 | 21.2 ± 2.2 (25) | 1123 (935–1245) (25) | 29.3 (12.6–39.6) (23) | |||
| 1-7 | 22.2 ±1.8 (28) | ns | 1222 (962–1447) (28) | ns | 40.2 (24.2–63.1) (21) | ns |
| 1-6 | 23.8 ±2.3 (5) | ns | 1242 (1187–1270) (5) | ns | 73.3 (55.7–75.3) (5) | * |
| 1-5 | 22.5 ±1.9 (7) | ns | 1151 (813–1170) (7) | ns | 47.5 (39.7–65.8) (7) | ns |
| 1-4 | 20.5 ±2.0 (8) | ns | 890 (797–933) (8) | * | 29.2 (18.8–44.6) (8) | ns |
| 1-3 | 22.4 ±3.0 (16) | ns | 951 (839–1086) (16) | ns | 21.7 (14.7–57.7) (15) | ns |
| 3-7 | 23.3 ±1.8 (15) | ns | 1230 (1064–1501) (15) | ns | 23.5 (17.1–48.3) (15) | ns |
| 4-7 | 21.4 ±1.9 (19) | ns | 1147 (1061–1235) (17) | ns | 37.2 (26.6–56.6) (16) | ns |
| 5-7 | 21.2 ±1.7 (12) | ns | 956 (893–1116) (12) | ns | 33.2 (23–52.8) (12) | ns |
a, ANOVA vs. DBA/2J with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test; b, Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric ANOVA vs. DBA/2J with Dunn’s multiple comparison test; IQR, interquartile range; ns, not significant; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.