| Literature DB >> 35050550 |
Meritxell Perramón1,2, Silvia Carvajal1,2, Vedrana Reichenbach1,2, Guillermo Fernández-Varo1,2, Loreto Boix2,3,4, Laura Macias-Muñoz1,2, Pedro Melgar-Lesmes1,2,5,6, Jordi Bruix2,3,4, Shlomo Melmed7, Santiago Lamas8, Wladimiro Jiménez1,2,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: PTTG1 is almost undetectable in adult livers but is highly expressed in hepatocarcinoma. While little is known about its involvement in liver fibrosis, PTTG1 expression is associated with DLK1. We assessed the role of the PTTG1/DLK1 pathway in fibrosis progression and the potential therapeutic effect of PTTG1 silencing in fibrosis.Entities:
Keywords: extracellular matrix; fibrosis; gene therapy; liver; siRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35050550 PMCID: PMC9303549 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Liver Int ISSN: 1478-3223 Impact factor: 8.754
FIGURE 1Expression of Pttg1 and Dlk1 in experimental liver fibrosis. A, Staging of CCl4‐treated rats based on liver‐collagen content. Sirius red staining of representative liver sections (×100). B, Hepatic Pttg1 and Dlk1 mRNA of control (n = 13) and CCl4‐treated rats with mild/moderate fibrosis (n = 6), severe fibrosis (n = 8) and cirrhosis (n = 11). C, Pttg1 and Dlk1 mRNA in organs from control (n = 5) and cirrhotic rats (n = 5). Results are expressed as mean ± SE. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs control; ## P < 0.01 vs cirrhosis. One‐way ANOVA with Newman‐Keuls post hoc test or Kruskal‐Wallis test with Dunn post hoc test
FIGURE 2Pttg1 and Dlk1 expression. A, Pttg1 and Dlk1 mRNA in hepatocytes (HEP), stellate cells (HSC) and endothelial cells (EC) from control (n = 2) and cirrhotic rat livers (n = 2). Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs control, ††P < 0.01 vs cirrhotic HEP; # P < 0.05, ## P 0.01 vs cirrhotic EC. !P < 0.05 vs control HEP. B, COL1α1, PTTG1 and DLK1 mRNA in liver from cirrhotic (n = 12) and non‐cirrhotic patients (n = 7). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs control. C, Immunnolocalization of PTTG1 and DLK1 in rat control and cirrhotic liver (200×). D, Western blots for rat hepatic DLK1, TGFβ, TNFα and angiotensin II (AII)
FIGURE 3DLK1 serum levels in rats with experimental fibrosis. A, Serum concentrations of DLK1 in control (n = 13), mild/moderate fibrosis (n = 6), severe fibrosis (n = 8) and cirrhotic (n = 11) rats. Each point represents single DLK1 value in serum. Horizontal lines indicate the mean value for each group. ***P < 0.001 vs control; ### P < 0.001 vs cirrhotic. One‐way ANOVA with Newman‐Keuls post hoc test. Correlation of DLK1 serum levels with (B) histological quantification of liver fibrosis (r = 0.74; P < 0.001); C mean arterial pressure (r = −0.69; P < 0.001; and D, portal pressure (r = 0.43; P < 0.01) in control (n = 13) and CCl4‐treated (n = 25) rats. Pearson two‐tailed test
FIGURE 4Hepatic fibrosis in Pttg1 mice. A, Sirius red staining from healthy and fibrotic Pttg1 and Pttg1 mice (100×). B, Fiber content in Pttg1 (n = 4) and Pttg1 ‐/‐ (n = 7) mice. ***P ≤ 0.001 vs Pttg1 , unpaired t‐test. C, Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes in a pair‐wise comparison of Pttg1 (n = 4) and Pttg1 ‐/‐ (n = 4) mice. Significance was set to a P value based on a Student’s t‐test of 0.05 (−log10 [P‐value] ≥1.30), the biological cut‐off was set to a fold regulation of ±1.5 fold (−1 ≥log1.5 [FC of fibrotic Pttg1 KO/fibrotic WT] ≥1). According with these two criteria, the top 12 differentially expressed genes are labeled with their corresponding gene ID. Insignificant (black), statistically but not biologically significant down‐regulated (grey), biologically but not statistically downregulated (blue) and upregulated (pink), and both biologically and statistically significant downregulated (green) up regulated (yellow) genes in fibrotic Pttg1 mice
Hepatic mRNA expression of genes involved in pathogenic mechanisms of liver fibrosis showing 1.5‐fold or greater regulation between control Pttg1 (n = 4) and fibrotic Pttg1 (n = 4) mice
| Gene symbol | Fold regulation | Gene symbol | Fold regulation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fibrosis | |||
|
| 1.92 |
| 2.35 |
|
| −2.35 |
| 1.78 |
| Extracellular matrix and cell adhesion molecules | |||
|
| 4.72 |
| 4.44 |
|
| 3.79 |
| 5.59 |
|
| 2.95 |
| 2.42 |
|
| 2.38 |
| 7.52 |
|
| 1.57 |
| 4.50 |
|
| 1.57 |
| 9.35 |
|
| 4.54 |
| 2.84 |
|
| 8.51 |
| 2.06 |
|
| 1.55 |
| 1.86 |
|
| 4.55 |
| 1.96 |
| Inflammatory cytokines and chemokines | |||
|
| 7.58 |
| 2.98 |
|
| −1.75 |
| 2.69 |
|
| 4.35 |
| −1.56 |
|
| 3.44 |
| −1.61 |
|
| 2.38 |
| 1.53 |
|
| 4.43 |
| 4.64 |
|
| 1.82 | ||
| Growth factors | |||
|
| 1.60 |
| 1.73 |
|
| −1.65 |
| 1.72 |
|
| 1.52 |
| 2.43 |
| Signal transduction | |||
|
| 1.51 |
| 2.04 |
|
| 2.85 |
| 2.67 |
|
| 2.69 |
| 2.69 |
|
| 1.83 |
| 1.79 |
|
| 2.17 |
| 2.37 |
|
| 1.91 |
| 3.01 |
|
| 1.69 |
| 2.98 |
| Epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition | |||
|
| 1.63 | ||
Abbreviations: mRNA determined by Acta2, Alpha 2 smooth muscle actin; Agt, angiotensinogen; Akt1, AKT serine/threonine kinase 1; Bcl2, B‐cell lymphoma 2; Cav1, caveolin 1; Ccl3, C–C Motif chemokine ligand 3; Ccl11, C–C motif chemokine ligand 11; Ccr2, C–C motif chemokine receptor 2; Col1a2, collagen type I Alpha 2 Chain; Col3a1, collagen type III Alpha 1 Chain; Ctgf, cellular communication network factor 2; Cxcr4, C–X–C motif chemokine receptor 4; Edn1, Endothelin 1; Egf, epidermal growth factor; Fasl, tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 6 Ligand; Grem1, Gremlin 1; Ifng, interferon gamma; Il1a, Interleukin 1 Alpha; Il1b, Interleukin 1 Beta; Il4, Interleukin 4; Il5, Interleukin 5; Il10, Interleukin 10; Il13ra2, Interleukin 13 Receptor Subunit Alpha 2; Ilk, Integrin Linked Kinase; Inhbe, Inhibin Subunit Beta E; Itga2, Integrin Subunit Alpha 2; Itgb3, Integrin Subunit Beta 3; Itgb5, Integrin Subunit Beta 5; Lox, Lysyl Oxidase; Mmp1a, Matrix Metallopeptidase 1a; Mmp2, matrix metallopeptidase 2; Mmp3, matrix metallopeptidase 3; Mmp8, matrix metallopeptidase 8; Mmp9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; Mmp13, matrix metallopeptidase 13; Mmp14, matrix metallopeptidase 14; Myc, MYC proto‐oncogene, BHLH transcription factor; Pdgfa, platelet‐derived growth factor subunit A; Pdgfb, platelet‐derived growth factor subunit B; Plat, plasminogen activator, tissue type; Plau, plasminogen activator, Urokinase; Serpine1, serpin family E member 1; Smad3, SMAD family member 3; Smad6, SMAD family member 6; Smad7, SMAD family member 7; Stat6, signal transducer and activator of transcription 6; Tgfb1, transforming growth factor‐beta 1; Tgfb2, transforming growth factor‐beta 2; Tgfb3, transforming growth factor‐beta 3; Tgfbr1, transforming growth factor‐beta receptor 1; Tgfbr2, transforming growth factor‐beta receptor 2; Thbs1, thrombospondin 1; Thbs2, thrombospondin 2; Timp1, tissue inhibitor of metallopeptidase 1; Timp2, tissue inhibitor of metallopeptidase 2; Timp3, tissue inhibitor of metallopeptidase 3; Timp4, tissue inhibitor of metallopeptidase 4; Tnf, tumour necrosis factor.
P < 0.05
P < 0.01
P < 0.001 vs control WT mice. Unpaired Student’s t test.
FIGURE 5Effect of Pttg1 siRNA on Pttg1 and Dlk1 expression. A, mRNA expression of Pttg1 in CC‐1 cells transfected with C‐siRNA or Pttg1 siRNA for 24, 48 and 72 h. Results are expressed as mean ± SE. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs C‐siRNA. One‐way ANOVA with Newman‐Keuls post hoc test. B, mRNA xpression of Pttg1 and Dlk1 in liver tissue of control (n = 6) and fibrotic rats treated with C‐siRNA (n = 6) or Pttg1 siRNA (n = 6). *P < 0.05 vs C‐siRNA; # P < 0.05 vs Pttg1 siRNA. Kruskal‐Wallis test with Dunn post hoc test
FIGURE 6Effect of Pttg1 blockade on fibrosis progression. Control (n = 6) and fibrotic rats receiving C‐siRNA (n =6) or Pttg1 siRNA (n = 6). A, Sirius red and α‐SMA stainings (100×). B, Quantitative measurement of relative fibrosis and α‐SMA positive area, portal pressure and Tnfα mRNA. C, Hepatic messenger expression of Col1α2, Col3α1, Tgfβr1 and Pdgfrβ. D, Hepatic Mmp2, Mmp9, Timp1 and Timp2 mRNA expression. Results are given as mean ± SE. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs control; # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 vs C‐siRNA treated rats. One‐way ANOVA with Newman‐Keuls post hoc test or the Kruskal‐Wallis test with Dunn post hoc test
Serum markers of liver function in control rats and fibrotic rats treated with C− or Pttg1 siRNAs
| Control (n = 6) | Fibrosis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C− siRNA (n = 6) |
| ||
| Alanine transaminase (U/L) | 43 ± 6 | 1069 ± 356 | 1226 ± 385 |
| Aspartate transaminase (U/L) | 56 ± 11 | 2342 ± 561 | 924 ± 235 |
| Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) | 356 ± 27 | 1197 ± 224 | 349 ± 49 |
| Gamma‐glutamyl transferase (U/L) | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 5.38 ± 1.68 | 2.40 ± 1.10 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.08 ± 0.32 | 0.22 ± 0.12 |
| Total proteins (g/L) | 49.7 ± 2.2 | 41.0 ± 3.0 | 44.5 ± 1.8 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 27.6 ± 1.8 | 23.9 ± 1.9 | 27.0 ± 2.1 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 55.4 ± 9.9 | 68.29 ± 8.39 | 50.80 ± 6.43 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 4.34 ± 1.03 | 57.5 ± 12.7 | 33.0 ± 7.7 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 207 ± 36 | 73 ± 23 | 91 ± 21 |
One‐way ANOVA with the Newman–Keuls post hoc test or the Kruskal‐Wallis test with the Dunn post hoc test when appropriate. Results are given as mean ± SE.
P < 0.05
P < 0.01
P < 0.001 vs control.